Seismic risk assessments and GIS technology: Applications to infrastructures in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region (NE Italy)

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1677-1690

  Codermatz, Raffaella ^a   Nicolich, Rinaldo ^a   Slejko, Dario ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI OCEANOGRAFIA E DI GEOFISICA SPERIMENTALE OGS   (Italy)

Author keywords

Geographic information systems (GIS); HAZUS methodology; Highway network; Industrial plants; Seismic hazard; Seismic risk

Indexed keywords

BRIDGES; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TUNNELS;

REGIONAL HIGHWAYS;

SEISMOLOGY;

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; GIS; GROUND MOTION; INFRASTRUCTURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

FRIULI-VENEZIA GIULIA; ITALY;

EID: 0042418748     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.294     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Slejko D, Carulli GB, Nicolich R, Rebez A, Zanferrari A, Cavallin A, Doglioni C, Carraro F, Castaldini D, Iliceto V, Semenza E, Zanolla C. Seismotectonics of the eastern Southern-Alps, a review. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 1989; 31:109-136.
2. Slejko D, Neri G, Orozova I, Renner G, Wyss M. Stress field in Friuli (NE Italy) from fault plane solutions of activity following the 1976 main shock. Bulletin of the Seismological Sociely of America 1999; 89:1037-1052.
3. Ambraseys NN. Evaluation of seismic risk. In: Ritsema AR, Gurpinar A (eds), Seismicity and seismic risk in the offshore North Sea area. Reidel: Dordrecht, 1983; pp. 317-345.
4. Slejko D. Rischio sismico = pericolosità sismica * vulnerabilità * valore. Geologia Tecnica 1988; 3/2:32-37.
5. Yang WS, Slejko D, Viezzoli D, Gasparo F. Seismic risk in Friuli-Venezia Giulia: an approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1989: 8:96-105.
6. Peruzza L, Rebez A, Slejko D. Seismic hazard mapping for administrative purposes. Natural Hazards 2001; 23:431-442.
7. Cornell CA. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1968; 58: 1583-1606.
8. Bender B, Perkins DM. Seisrisk III: a computer program for seismic hazard estimation. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1772, Denver, 1987.
9. Meletti C, Patacca E, Scandone P. Construction of a seismotectonic model: the case of Italy. Pure and Applied Geophysics 2000; 157:11-35.
10. Camassi R, Stucchi M. NT4.1, un catalogo parametrico di terremoti di area italiana al di sopra della soglia del danno. C.N.R. GNDT, Milano, 1996.
11. Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ. Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25:371-400.
12. Grandori G, Perotti F, Tagliani A. On the attenuation of macroseismic intensity with epicentral distance. In: Cakmak AS (ed.), Ground Motion and Engineering Seismology Developments in Geotechnical Engineering. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1987; vol. 44:581-594.
13. Eurocode8. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. Part 5: Foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. Doc. ENV 1998-5, CEN European Committee for Standardization, Bruxelles, 1994.
14. Slejko D, Peruzza L, Rebez A. Seismic hazard maps of Italy. Annali di Geofisica 1998; 41:183-214.
15. Peruzza L. Macroseismic attenuation relationships of Italian earthquakes for seismic hazard assessment purposes. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 2000; 41:31-48.
16. Gruenthal G. European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Cahiers du Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie, vol. 15. Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie, Luxembourg, 1998.
17. FEMA. HAZUS 99. Estimated annualized earthquake losses for the U.S.A. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., 1999.
18. Risk Management Solutions Inc. Development of a standardized earthquake loss estimation methodology. Risk Management Solutions Inc., Menlo Park, 1996.