Selection of natural and synthetic accelerograms for seismic vulnerability studies on reinforced concrete frames

Journal of Structural Engineering

Volumn 137, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 367-378

  Masi, Angelo ^a   Vona, Marco ^a   Mucciarelli, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Damage scenarios; Earthquake ground motion selection; Nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures; Reinforced concrete; Seismic input; Selection of accelerograms; Vulnerability studies

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE SCENARIOS; NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES; SEISMIC INPUT; SELECTION OF ACCELEROGRAMS; VULNERABILITY STUDIES;

CONCRETE BUILDINGS; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; EARTHQUAKES; GRAPHIC METHODS; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL MEMBERS;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 79953236235     PISSN: 07339445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000209     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ambraseys, N., (2004). Internet-site for European strong-motion data. Boll. Geofis. Teor. Appl. 0006-6729, 45 (3), 113-129.
2. Baber, T. T., and Noori, M. N. (1985). Random vibration of degrading pinching systems. J. Eng. Mech., 111 (8), 1010-1026. 0733-9399 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:8(1010)
3. Barnaba, C., Priolo, E., Vuan, A., and Romanelli, N. (2007). Site effect of the strong-motion site at Tolmezzo-Ambiesta dam in northeastern Italy. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 0037-1106, 97, 339-346. 10.1785/0120060077
4. Bouc, R. (1967). Forced vibration of mechanical systems with hysteresis. Proc., 4th Conf. on Nonlinear Oscillations, Prague, Czech Republic.
5. Bracci, J. M. G., Reinhorn, A. M., and Mander, J. B. (1995). Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed for gravity loads: Performance of structural system. ACI Struct. J., 2 (5), 597-609.
6. Braga, F., Dolce, M., and Liberatore, D. (1982). Southern Italy November 23, 1980 earthquake: A statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M.S.K.-76 scale. CNR-PFG Rep. N. 503, Rome.
7. Chopra, A. K. (2001). Dynamics of structures: Theory and application to earthquake engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
8. Comit Europen de Normalisation (CEN). (2003). Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Eurocode 8, Final Draft, Brussels, Belgium
9. Comit Europen de Normalisation (CEN). (2005). Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Eurocode 8, EN 1998-3, Brussels, Belgium
10. Dolce, M., Marino, M., Masi, A., and Vona, M. (2003). Earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of potenza town (southern Italy) including site effects. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 1573-1456, 1 (1), 115-140. 10.1023/A: 1024809511362
11. Elenas, A. (1997). Interdipendency between seismic acceleration parameters and the behaviour of strucutures. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 16, 317-322. 0261-7277 10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00005-5 (Pubitemid 27419733)
12. Elenas, A. (2000). Correlation between seismic acceleration parameters and overall structural damage indices of buildings. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 20, 93-100. 0261-7277 10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00041-5
13. ESC Working Group Macroseismic Scales. (1998). European macroseismic scale of 1998, GeoForschun-gsZentrum, Potsdam, Germany.
14. FEMA-NIBS. (1999). Earthquake loss estimation methodology, HAZUS99 technical manual, Vol. 1-3, Washington, DC.
15. Gallipoli, M. R., (2010). Empirical estimates of dynamic parameters on a large set of European buildings. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 1573-1456, 8 (3), 593-607.
16. Gallipoli, M. R., Mucciarelli, M., and Vona, M. (2009). Empirical estimate of fundamental frequencies and damping for Italian buildings. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 38 (8), 973-988.
17. Ghobarah, A., Aziz, T., and Abou-Elfath, H. (1999). Softening effects on the seismic response of non ductile concrete frames. J. Earthquake Eng., 3 (1), 59-81. 1363-2469 10.1142/S1363246999000041
18. Iervolino, J., and Cornell, C. A. (2005). Record selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Earthquake Spectra, 21 (3), 685-713. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.1990199 (Pubitemid 41226644)
19. Kalkan, E., and Kunnath, S. K. (2007). Effective cyclic energy as a measure of seismic demand. J. Earthquake Eng. 1363-2469, 11 (5), 725-751. (Pubitemid 47266807)
20. Kalkan, E., and Kunnath, S. K. (2008). Relevance of absolute and relative energy content in seismic evaluation of structures. Adv. Struct. Eng., 11 (1), 17-34. (Pubitemid 351554030)
21. Kunnath, K. S., Hoffmann, G., Reinhorn, A. M., and Mander, J. B. (1995 b). Gravity load designed RC buildings-Part II: Evaluation of detailing enhancements. ACI Struct. J., 92 (4), 470-478.
22. Kwon, O., and Elnashai, A. (2006). The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure. Eng. Struct., 28, 289-303. 0141-0296 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.010 (Pubitemid 41722848)
23. Luco, N., and Cornell, C. A. (2007). Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra, 23, 357-392. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.2723158 (Pubitemid 46958312)
24. Mainstone, R. J. (1974). Supplementary note on the stiffness and strength of infilled frames. Current Paper CP13/74, Building Research Establishment, London.
25. Masi, A. (2003). Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity load designed R/C frames. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 1573-1456, 1 (3), 371-395. 10.1023/B:BEEE.0000021426.31223.60
26. Masi, A., and Vona, M. (2008). Estimation of the period of vibration of existing RC building types based on experimental data and numerical results. Increasing seismic safety by combining engineering technology and seismological data, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 207-226.
27. Masi, A., and Vona, M. (2009). Experimental and numerical evaluation of the fundamental period of undamaged and damaged RC buildings. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 1573-1456, 8 (3), 643-656.
28. Mucciarelli, M., Pacor, F., Vanini, M., and Bettinali, F. (1997). Definition of seismic input for base isolation applications: methodologies assessment, statistical analysis and tools developed. Proc., Post-SMIRT Conf. Seismic Isolation, SMIRT, Taormina, Italy.
29. Naeim, F., ed. (2001). The seismic design handbook, 1st Ed., Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA.
30. Nanos, N., and Elenas, A. (2006). Seismic duration effects on the vulnerability of buildings. Proc., First European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, ESC/EAEE.
31. Park, Y. J., Ang, A. H. S., and Wen, Y. K. (1987a). Damage limiting aseismic design of buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 3 (1), 1-26. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.1585416 (Pubitemid 17601413)
32. Park, Y. J., Reinhorn, A. M., and Kunnath, S. K. (1987 b). IDARC: Inelastic damage analysis of frame shear-wall structures. Tech. Rep. No. NCEER 87-0008, Univ. of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
33. Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M., and Kowalsky, M. J. (2007). Displacement-based seismic design of structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
34. Sabetta, F., and Pugliese, A. (1996). Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 0037-1106, 86 (2), 337-352.
35. Sivaselvan, M. V., and Reinhorn, A. M. (1999). Hysteretic models for cyclic behavior of deteriorating inelastic structures. Tech. Rep. No. NCEER 99-0018, Univ. of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
36. Spence, R., and, Le Brun, B., eds. (2006). Earthquake scenarios for European cities-The RISK-UE project. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 1573-1456, 4 (4), 319-463. 10.1007/s10518-006-9019-9 (Pubitemid 44837434)
37. Valles, R. E., Reinhorn, A. M., Kunnath, S. K., Li, C., and Madan, A. (1996). Idarc 2d Version 4.0: A program for the inelastic damage analysis of buildings. Tech. Rep. No. NCEER 96-0010, Univ. of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
38. Vanmarcke, E. H., and Gasparini, D. A. (1976). SIMQKE: A program for artificial motion generation. Rep. No. R76-4, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 99.