Adaptive divergence in moor frog (rana arvalis) populations along an acidification gradient: Inferences from q st-f st correlations

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 867-881

  Hangartner, Sandra ^a   Laurila, Anssi ^b   Räsänen, Katja ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Acid stress; Adaptive divergence; Amphibians; Environmental gradient; Environmental stress; Q ST F ST comparisons

Indexed keywords

ACIDIFICATION; ADAPTIVE RADIATION; CORRELATION; DIVERGENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FROG; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NATURAL SELECTION; ORGANIC ACID; PH; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; POND; POPULATION STRUCTURE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPATIAL VARIATION; TOLERANCE;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; RANIDAE; SWEDEN;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; RANIDAE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SWEDEN;

SWEDEN;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; RANA ARVALIS;

EID: 84857686010     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01472.x     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Alho, J., G. Herczeg, A. Laugen, K. Räsänen, A. Laurila, and J. Merilä 2011. Allen's rule revisited: quantitative genetics of extremity length in the common frog along a latitudinal gradient. J. Evol. Biol. 24:59-70.
2. Aljanabi, S. M., and I. Martinez 1997. Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4692-4693.
3. Antoniazza, S., R. Burri, L. Fumagalli, J. Goudet, and A. Roulin 2010. Local adaptation maintains clinal variation in melanin-based coloration of European barn owls (Tyto Alba). Evolution 64:1944-1954.
4. Antonovics, J., and A. D. Bradshaw 1970. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. VIII. Clinal patterns at a mine boundary. Heredity 25:349-362.
5. Balloux, F., H. Brunner, N. Lugon Moulin, J. Hausser, and J. Goudet 2000. Microsatellites can be misleading: an empirical and simulation study. Evolution 54:1414-1422.
6. Berlin, S., J. Merilä, and H. Ellegren 2000. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the common frog, Rana temporaria. Mol. Ecol. 9:1938-1939.
7. Brookfield, J. F. Y. 1996. A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Mol. Ecol. 5:453-455.
8. Browne, R. K., J. Seratt, C. Vance, and A. Kouba 2006. Hormonal priming, induction of ovulation and in-vitro fertilization of the endangered Wyoming toad (Bufo baxteri). Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 4: 1-11.
9. Castellano, S., and E. Balletto 2002. Is the partial Mantel test inadequate? Evolution 56:1871-1873.
10. Conover, D. O., T. A. Duffy, and L. A. Hice 2009. The covariance between genetic and environmental influences across ecological gradients. Reassessing the evolutionary significance of countergradient and cogradient variation. The Year in Evolutionary Biology 2009. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 1168:100-129.
11. Conover, D. O., and E. T. Schultz 1995. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:248-252.
12. Dahl, E. 2011. Physiological and environmental processes influencing growth strategies in amphibian larvae. Ph.D. thesis. Uppsala University, Uppsala
13. Excoffier, L., G. Laval, and S. Schneider 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. Online 1: 47-50.
14. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetic theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford
15. Garner, T. W. J., and G. Tomio 2001. Microsatellites for use in studies of the Italian agile frog, Rana latastei (Boulenger). Conserv. Genet. 2:77-80.
16. Ghalambor, C. K., J. K. McKay, S. P. Carroll, and D. N. Reznick 2007. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct. Ecol. 21:394-407.
17. Gilchrist, A. S., and L. Partridge 1999. A comparison of the genetic basis of wing size divergence in three parallel body size clines of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 153:1775-1787.
18. Glandt, D. 2006. Der Moorfrosch. Einheit und Vielfalt einer Braunfroschart. Beiheft der Zeitschrift für Feldherpetologie 10. Laurenti Verlag, Bielefeld.
19. Gomez-Mestre, I., and M. Tejedo 2004. Contrasting patterns of quantitative and neutral genetic variation in locally adapted populations of the natterjack toad, Bufo calamita. Evolution 58:2343-2352.
20. Goodman, S. 1997. RST Calc: a collection of computer programs for calculating estimates of genetic differentiation from microsatellite data and determining their significance. Mol. Ecol. 6:881-885.
21. Gosner, K. L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Copeia 1960:183-190.
22. Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86:485-486.
23. Gould, S. J., and R. F. Johnston 1972. Geographic variation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3:485-486.
24. Hangartner, S. 2010.Adaptive divergence of the moor frog (Rana arvalis) along an acidification gradient. Ph.D. Thesis. ETH Zurich, Switzerland
25. Hoffmann, A. A., and J. Merilä 1999. Heritable variation and evolution under favourable and unfavourable conditions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:96-101.
26. Hoffmann, A. A., and P. A. Parsons 1991.Evolutionary genetics and environmental stress. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K
27. Huey, R. B., G. W. Gilchrist, M. L. Carlson, D. Berrigan, and L. Serra 2000. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 287:308-309.
28. Hutchison, D. W., and A. R. Templeton 1999. Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution 53:1898-1914.
29. Jimenez-Ambriz, G., C. Petit, I. Bourrie, S. Dubois, I. Olivieri, and O. Ronce 2007. Life history variation in the heavy metal tolerant plant Thlaspi caerulescens growing in a network of contaminated and noncontaminated sites in southern France: role of gene flow, selection and phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol. 173:199-215.
30. Jones, L. P., R. Frankham, and J. S. F. Barker 1968. Effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. 2. Long-term response to selection. Genet. Res. 12:249-266.
31. Kawecki, T. J., and D. Ebert 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7:1225-1241.
32. Lande, R. 1992. Neutral theory of quantitative genetic variance in an island model with local extinction and colonization. Evolution 46:381-389.
33. Laugen, A. T., A. Laurila, and J. Merilä 2002. Maternal and genetic contributions to geographical variation in Rana temporaria larval life-history traits. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76:61-70.
34. Lee, H. J., and E. G. Boulding 2010. Latitudinal clines in body size, but not in thermal tolerance or heat-shock cognate 70 (HSC70), in the highly-dispersing intertidal gastropod Littorina keenae (Gastropoda: Littorinidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 100:494-505.
35. Leinonen, T., R. B. O'Hara, J. M. Cano, and J. Merilä 2008. Comparative studies of quantitative trait and neutral marker divergence: a meta-analysis. J. Evol. Biol. 21:1-17.
36. Lenormand, T. 2002. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:183-189.
37. Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, R. D. Stroup, R. D. Wolfinger, and O. Schabenberger 2006.SAS for mixed models. 2nd ed. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA
38. ST contrast to detect natural selection on quantitative traits. Genetics 176:725-727.
39. Lynch, M. 1996. A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues. Pp. 471-501 in J. C. Avise and J. L. Hamrick, eds. Conservation genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York
40. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh 1998.Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland.
41. Manly, B. F. J. 1997.Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London
42. Mantel, N. 1967. Detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:209-220.
43. Mendez, M., A. Subramaniam, T. Collins, G. Minton, R. Baldwin, P. Berggren, A. Särnblad, O. Amir, V. Peddemors, and L. Karczmarski 2011. Molecular ecology meets remote sensing: environmental drivers to population structure of humpback dolphins in the Western Indian Ocean. Heredity 107:349-361.
44. Merilä, J., and P. Crnokrak 2001. Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J. Evol. Biol. 14:892-903.
45. Merilä, J., F. Söderman, R. O'Hara, K. Räsänen, and A. Laurila 2004. Local adaptation and genetics of acid-stress tolerance in the moor frog, Rana arvalis. Conserv. Genet. 5:513-527.
46. Miner, B. E., and B. Kerr 2011. Adaptation to local ultraviolet radiation conditions among neighbouring Daphnia populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 278:1306-1313.
47. Moritz, C. 1995. Uses of molecular phylogenies for conservation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 349:113-118.
48. Mousseau, T. A., and C. W. Fox 1998. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:403-407.
49. O'Hara, R. B. 2005. Comparing the effects of genetic drift and fluctuating selection on genotype frequency changes in the scarlet tiger moth. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 272:211-217.
50. ST estimates: problems and some solutions. Genetics 171:1331-1339.
51. Ohta, T., and M. Kimura 1973. A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet. Res. 22:201-204.
52. Palo, J. U., R. B. O'Hara, A. T. Laugen, A. Laurila, C. R. Primmer, and J. Merilä 2003. Latitudinal divergence of common frog (Rana temporaria) life history traits by natural selection: evidence from a comparison of molecular and quantitative genetic data. Mol. Ecol. 12:1963-1978.
53. Pemberton, J. M., J. Slate, D. R. Bancroft, and J. A. Barrett 1995. Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci-a caution for parentage and population studies. Mol. Ecol. 4:249-252.
54. Perry, G. M. L., C. Audet, and L. Bernatchez 2005. Maternal genetic effects on adaptive divergence between anadromous and resident brook charr during early life history. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1348-1361.
55. Persson, M., K. Räsänen, A. Laurila, and J. Merilä 2007. Maternally determined adaptation to acidity in Rana arvalis: are laboratory and field estimates of embryonic stress tolerance congruent? Can. J. Zool. 85:832-838.
56. Pidancier, N., P. Gauthier, C. Miquel, and F. Pompanon 2002. Polymorphic microsatellite DNA loci identified in the common frog (Rana temporaria, Amphibia, Ranidae). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2:304-305.
57. Porcher, E., T. Giraud, I. Goldringer, and C. Lavigne 2004. Experimental demonstration of a causal relationship between heterogeneity of selection and genetic differentiation in quantitative traits. Evolution 58:1434-1445.
58. ST comparisons for natural populations meaningful? Mol. Ecol. 17:4782-4785.
59. Räsänen, K., and A. P. Hendry 2008. Disentangling interactions between adaptive divergence and gene flow when ecology drives diversification. Ecol. Lett. 11:624-636.
60. Räsänen, K., and L. E. B. Kruuk 2007. Maternal effects and evolution at ecological time-scales. Funct. Ecol. 21:408-421.
61. Räsänen, K., A. Laurila, and J. Merilä 2003a. Geographic variation in acid stress tolerance of the moor frog, Rana arvalis. I. Local adaptation. Evolution 57:352-362.
62. Räsänen, K., A. Laurila, and J. Merilä 2003b. Geographic variation in acid stress tolerance of the moor frog, Rana arvalis. II. Adaptive maternal effects. Evolution 57:363-371.
63. Räsänen, K., A. Laurila, and J. Merilä 2005. Maternal investment in egg size: environment- and population-specific effects on offspring performance. Oecologia 142:546-553.
64. Räsänen, K., F. Söderman, A. Laurila, and J. Merilä 2008. Geographic variation in maternal investment: acidity affects egg size and fecundity in Rana arvalis. Ecology 89:2553-2562.
65. Raymond, M., and F. Rousset 1995. An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1280-1283.
66. Reed, D. H., and R. Frankham 2001. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution 55:1095-1103.
67. Renberg, I., T. Korsman, and H. J. B. Birks 1993. Prehistoric increases in the pH of acid-sensitive Swedish lakes caused by land-use changes. Nature 362:824-827.
68. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
69. Richter-Boix, A., C. Teplitsky, B. Rogell, and A. Laurila 2010. Local selection modifies phenotypic divergence among Rana temporaria populations in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 19:716-731.
70. Roff, D. 1997.Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York
71. Sacks, B. N., D. L. Bannasch, B. B. Chomel, and H. B. Ernest 2008. Coyotes demonstrate how habitat specialization by individuals of a generalist species can diversify populations in a heterogeneous ecoregion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:1384-1394.
72. Saether, S. A., P. Fiske, J. A. Kalas, A. Kuresoo, L. Luigujoe, S. B. Piertney, T. Sahlman, and J. Hoglund, 2007. Inferring local adaptation from Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons: neutral genetic and quantitative trait variation in European populations of great snipe. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:1563-1576.
73. Slatkin, M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:393-430.
74. Slatkin, M. 1993. Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264-279.
75. Slatkin, M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457-462.
76. Sommer, S., and P. B. Pearman 2003. Quantitative genetic analysis of larval life history traits in two alpine populations of Rana temporaria. Genetica 118:1-10.
77. Spitze, K. 1993. Population-structure in Daphnia obtusa-quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics 135:367-374.
78. Storz, J. F. 2002. Contrasting patterns of divergence in quantitative traits and neutral DNA markers: analysis of clinal variation. Mol. Ecol. 11:2537-2551.
79. Urban, M. C. 2007. The growth-predation risk trade-off under a growing gape-limited predation threat. Ecology 88:2587-2597.
80. Valdes, A. M., M. Slatkin, and N. Freimer 1993. Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. Genetics 133:737-749.
81. Van Oosterhout, C., W. F. Hutchinson, D. P. M. Wills, and P. Shipley 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4:535-538.
82. Via, S., and R. Lande 1985. Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39:505-522.
83. Vos, C. C., A. G. Antonisse-De Jong, P. W. Goedhart, and M. J. M. Smulders 2001. Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis). Heredity 86:598-608.
84. Weir, B. S., and C. C. Cockerham 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
85. ST. Mol. Ecol. 17:1885-1896.
86. ST. Mol. Ecol. 20:1083-1091.
87. ST. Genetics 183:1055-1063.
88. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97-159.
89. Zeisset, I., G. Rowe, and T. J. C. Beebee 2000. Polymerase chain reaction primers for microsatellite loci in the north European water frogs Rana ridibunda and R. lessonae. Mol. Ecol. 9:1173-1174.