Differentiation of biologic scaffold materials through physicomechanical, thermal, and enzymatic degradation techniques

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 255, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 595-604

  Deeken, Corey R ^a   Eliason, Braden J ^a   Pichert, Matthew D ^a   Grant, Sheila A ^b   Frisella, Margaret M ^a   Matthews, Brent D ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLAGENASE; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CROSS LINKING; DERMIS; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; ENZYMATIC DEGRADATION; HERNIOPLASTY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MELTING POINT; NONHUMAN; PERICARDIUM; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SMALL INTESTINE; SURGEON; SUTURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; ENZYMES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; TEMPERATURE; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84857647969     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182445341     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ramshaw BJ, Bachman SL. Surgical materials for ventral hernia repair. Gen Surg News. 2007;2:1-14.
2. Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:250-255.
3. Hiles M, Record Ritchie RD, Altizer AM. Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair? A systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov. 2009;16:26-37.
4. Zienowicz RJ, Karacaoglu E. Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:373-381.
5. Badylak SF. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Transpl Immunol. 2004;12:367-377.
6. Hodde J. Naturally occurring scaffolds for soft tissue repair and regeneration. Tissue Eng. 2002;8:295-308.
7. Franklin ME, Jr, Trevino JM, Portillo G, et al. The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1941-1946.
8. Ueno T, Pickett LC, de la Fuente SG, et al. Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:109-112.
9. Milburn ML, Holton LH, Chung TL, et al. Acellular dermal matrix compared with synthetic implant material for repair of ventral hernia in the setting of peri-operative Staphylococcus aureus implant contamination: a rabbit model. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008;9:433-442.
10. Jenkins ED, Yip M, Melman L, et al. Informed consent: cultural and religious issues associated with the use of allogeneic and xenogeneic mesh products. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:402-410.
11. Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3675-3683.
12. Damink LHHO, Dijkstra PJ, van Luyn MJA, et al. Cross-linking of dermal sheep collagen using a water-soluble carbodiimide. Biomaterials. 1996;17:765-773.
13. Billiar K, Murray J, Laude D, et al. Effects of carbodiimide crosslinking conditions on the physical properties of laminated intestinal submucosa. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;56:101-108.
14. Olde Damink LH, Dijkstra PJ, van Luyn MJ, et al. In vitro degradation of dermal sheep collagen cross-linked using a water-soluble carbodiimide. Biomaterials. 1996;17:679-684.
15. Abraham GA, Murray J, Billiar K, et al. Evaluation of the porcine intestinal collagen layer as a biomaterial. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;51:442-452.
16. Khor E. Methods for the treatment of collagenous tissues for bioprostheses. Biomaterials. 1997;18:95-105.
17. Hardin-Young J, Carr RM, Downing GJ, et al. Modification of native collagen reduces antigenicity but preserves cell compatibility. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996;49:675-682.
18. Courtman DW, Errett BF, Wilson GJ. The role of crosslinking in modification of the immune response elicited against xenogenic vascular acellular matrices. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;55:576-586.
19. Charulatha V, Rajaram A. Influence of different crosslinking treatments on the physical properties of collagen membranes. Biomaterials. 2003;24:759-767.
20. Deeken CR, Abdo MS, Frisella MM, et al. Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2010;25:1451-1552.
21. Deeken CR, Abdo M, Frisella M, Matthews BD. Physicomechanical evaluation of polypropylene, polyester, and polytetrafluoroethylene meshes for inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:68-79.
22. Duan X, Sheardown H. Crosslinking of collagen with dendrimers. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;75:510-518.
23. Deeken CR, Melman L, Jenkins ED, et al. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:880-888.
24. Jenkins ED, Melman L, Deeken CR, et al. Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of fenestrated and nonfenestrated biologic mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:327-339.
25. Liang HC, Chang Y, Hsu CK, et al. Effects of crosslinking degree of an acellular biological tissue on its tissue regeneration pattern. Biomaterials. 2004;25:3541-3552.