Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of fenestrated and nonfenestrated biologic mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 212, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 327-339

  Jenkins, Eric D ^a   Melman, Lora ^a   Deeken, Corey R ^a   Greco, Suellen C ^b   Frisella, Margaret M ^a   Matthews, Brent D ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL DEFECT; ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FENESTRATION; HERNIOPLASTY; HISTOLOGY; MINIPIG; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ADHESION; TISSUE GROWTH;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HERNIA, VENTRAL; SURGICAL MESH; SWINE; SWINE, MINIATURE; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 79952286236     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hiles M, Record Ritchie RD, Altizer AM. Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair?: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov 2009;16:26-37.
2. Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials 2006;27:3675-3683.
3. Trabuco EC, Klingele CJ, Gebhart JB. Xenograft use in reconstructive pelvic surgery: a review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18:555-563. (Pubitemid 46554202)
4. Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, et al. Morphologic study of small intestinal submucosa as a body wall repair device. J Surg Res 2002;103:190-202. (Pubitemid 34948501)
5. Gandhi S, Kubba LM, Abramov Y, et al. Histopathologic changes of porcine dermis xenografts for transvaginal suburethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1643-1648.
6. Taylor DF. Porosity in silver-tin amalgams. J Biomed Mater Res 1972;6:289-304.
7. Wilkins ES. Tissue reaction to intraperitoneally implanted catheter materials. J Biomed Eng 1991;13:173-175.
8. Wake MC, Patrick CW Jr, Mikos AG. Pore morphology effects on the fibrovascular tissue growth in porous polymer substrates. Cell Transplant 1994;3:339-343. (Pubitemid 24216213)
9. Bezuidenhout D, Davies N, Zilla P. Effect of well defined dodecahedral porosity on inflammation and angiogenesis. ASAIO J 2002;48:465-471.
10. Matthews BD, Pratt BL, Pollinger HS, et al. Assessment of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal polypropylene mesh and polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. J Surg Res 2003;114:126-132. (Pubitemid 37237676)
11. Otterburn D, Losken A. The use of porcine acellular dermal material for TRAM flap donor-site closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:74e-76e.
12. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 2004;240:578-583.
13. Jenkins ED, Melman L, Deeken CR, et al. Evaluation of fenestrated and non-fenestrated biologic grafts in a porcine model of mature ventral incisional hernia repair. Hernia 2010;14:599-610.
14. Garrard CL, Clements RH, Nanney L, et al. Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1999;13:10-13. (Pubitemid 29156676)
15. Valentin JE, Badylak JS, McCabe GP, Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:2673-2686. (Pubitemid 44901955)
16. Abolhoda A, Yu S, Oyarzun JR, et al. Calcification of bovine pericardium: glutaraldehyde versus No-React biomodification. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:169-174. (Pubitemid 26239860)
17. Courtman DW, Errett BF, Wilson GJ. The role of crosslinking in modification of the immune response elicited against xenogenic vascular acellular matrices. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;55:576-586. (Pubitemid 32336288)
18. Candage R, Jones K, Luchette FA, et al. Use of human acellular dermal matrix for hernia repair: friend or foe? Surgery 2008;144:703-709.