Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 212, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 880-888

  Deeken, Corey R ^a   Melman, Lora ^a   Jenkins, Eric D ^a   Greco, Suellen C ^a   Frisella, Margaret M ^a   Matthews, Brent D ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ABDOMINAL WALL MUSCULATURE; ANGIOGENESIS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADATION; BIOLOGIC MESH; BIOMECHANICS; CELL INFILTRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; ENCAPSULATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; FIBROBLAST; HERNIOPLASTY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INFLAMMATORY CELL; MATERIALS TESTING; MINIPIG; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE REPAIR;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; BIOPROSTHESIS; COLLAGEN; HERNIA, VENTRAL; SURGICAL MESH; SWINE; SWINE, MINIATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 79955624351     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 1985;72:70-71. (Pubitemid 15158872)
2. Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM Jr, Reines HD, et al. Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh. Am J Surg 1996;171:80-84.
3. Hoer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. [Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years]. Chirurg 2002;73:474-480.
4. Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT, et al. Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg 2000;24:95-100.
5. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 2000;343:392-398. (Pubitemid 30626121)
6. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 2004;240:578-583.
7. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G. Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years' experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 2003;238:391-399.
8. Milburn ML, Holton LH, Chung TL, et al. Acellular dermal matrix compared with synthetic implant material for repair of ventral hernia in the setting of peri-operative Staphylococcus aureus implant contamination: a rabbit model. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2008;9:433-442.
9. Badylak SF. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Transplant Immunology 2004;12:367-377. (Pubitemid 38639730)
10. Badylak SF. The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material. Biomaterials 2007;28:3587-3593. (Pubitemid 46855878)
11. Xu H, Wan H, Sandor M, et al. Host response to human acellular dermal matrix transplantation in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A 2008;14:2009-2019.
12. Sandor M, Xu H, Connor J, et al. Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologic materials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A 2008;14:2021-2031.
13. Burns NK, Jaffari MV, Rios CN, et al. Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:167-176.
14. van der Laan JS, Lopez GP, van Wachem PB, et al. TFE-plasma polymerized dermal sheep collagen for the repair of abdominal wall defects. Int J Artif Organs 1991;14:661-666.
15. James NL, Poole-Warren LA, Schindhelm K, et al. Comparative evaluation of treated bovine pericardium as a xenograft for hernia repair. Biomaterials 1991;12:801-809.
16. van Wachem PB, van Luyn MJ, Olde Damink LH, et al. Tissue regenerating capacity of carbodiimide-crosslinked dermal sheep collagen during repair of the abdominal wall. Int J Artif Organs 1994;17:230-239.
17. Zheng F, Lin Y, Verbeken E, et al. Host response after reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with porcine dermal collagen in a rat model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1961-1970. (Pubitemid 39601500)
18. US Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. The Animal Studies Committee manual guidelines for the care and use of research animals. Available at: http://asc wustl edu/manual/index html 2010. Accessed August 1, 2010.
19. Valentin JE, Badylak JS, McCabe GP, Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:2673-2686. (Pubitemid 44901955)
20. Jenkins ED, Melman L, Deeken CR, et al. Evaluation of fenestrated and non-fenestrated biologic grafts in a porcine model of mature ventral incisional hernia repair. Hernia 2010;14:599-610.