Acellular dermal matrix compared with synthetic implant material for repair of ventral hernia in the setting of peri-operative Staphylococcus aureus implant contamination: A rabbit model

Surgical Infections

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 433-442

  Milburn, Meghan L ^a   Holton III, Luther H ^a   Chung, Thomas L ^a   Li, Edward N ^a   Bochicchio, Grant V ^a   Goldberg, Nelson H ^a   Silverman, Ronald P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLITEF;

ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; CELL GROWTH; COLONY FORMING UNIT; HERNIA; IMPLANT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPSIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS INFECTION; WOUND COMPLICATION;

ANIMALS; COLLAGEN; DERMIS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HERNIA, VENTRAL; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RABBITS; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 50849107320     PISSN: 10962964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2007.044     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 2000;343:392-398.
2. Bauer JJ, Salky BA, Gelernt IM, et al. Repair of large abdominal wall defects with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Ann Surg 1987;206:765-769.
3. Menon NG, Rodriguez ED, Byrnes CK, et al. Revascularization of human acellular dermis in full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction in the rabbit model. Ann Plast Surg 2003;50:523-527.
4. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from October 1986-April 1996; issued May 1996. Am J Infect Control 1996;24:380-388.
5. Dunne JR, Malone DL, Tracy JK, et al. Abdominal wall hernias: Risk factors for infection and resource utilization. J Surg Res 2003;111:78-84.
6. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1990-May 1999; issued June 1999. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:520-528.
7. Disa JJ, Klein MH, Goldberg, NH. Advantages of autologous fascia versus synthetic patch abdominal reconstruction in experimental animal defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97:801-806.
8. Disa JJ, Goldberg NH, Carlton JM, et al. Restoring abdominal wall integrity in contaminated tissue-deficient wounds using autologous fascia grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:979-986.
9. Wainwright DJ, Madden M, Luterman L, et al. Clinical evaluation of an acellular dermal matrix in full-thickness burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1996;17:124-136.
10. Silverstein LH, Callan DP. An acellular dermal matrix allograft substitute for palatal donor tissue. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dentistry 1996;3:14-21.
11. Jones FR, Schwartz BM, Silverstein P. Use of a non-immunogenic acellular dermal allograft for soft-tissue augmentation: A preliminary report. Aesthet Surg Q 1996;16:196-201.
12. Costantino PD, Wolpoe ME, Govindaraj S, et al. Human dural replacement with acellular dermis: Clinical results and a review of the literature. Head Neck 2000;22:765-771.
13. Silverman RP, Li EN, Holton LH 3rd, et al. Ventral hernia repair using allogenic acellular dermal matrix in a swine model. Hernia 2004;8:336-342.
14. Eppley BL. Experimental assessment of the revascularization of acellular human dermis for soft-tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:757-762.
15. Holton LH 3rd, Kim D, Silverman RP, et al. Human acellular dermal matrix for repair of abdominal wall defects: Review of clinical experience and experimental data. J Long-Term Effects Med Implants 2005;15:547-558.
16. Kim H, Bruen K, Vargo D. Acellular dermal matrix in the management of high-risk abdominal wall defects. Am J Surg 2006;192:705-709.
17. Diaz JJ Jr, Guy J, Berkes MB, et al. Acellular dermal allograft for ventral hernia repair in the compromised surgical field. Am Surg 2006;72:1181-1187.