Predicting OA progression to total hip replacement: Can we do better than risk factors alone using active shape modelling as an imaging biomarker?

Rheumatology

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 562-570

  Barr, Rebecca J ^a   Gregory, Jennifer S ^a   Reid, David M ^a   Aspden, Richard M ^a   Yoshida, Kanako ^a   Hosie, Gillian ^b   Silman, Alan J ^c   Alesci, Salvatore ^d   Macfarlane, Gary J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b Primary Care Rheumatology Society   (United Kingdom)

^c Arthritis Research UK   (United Kingdom)

^d MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Active shape modelling; Biomarker; Osteoarthritis; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ACTIVE SHAPE MODELLING; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONSULTATION; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PAIN; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULUM; AGED; ARTHRALGIA; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; COHORT STUDIES; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84857508381     PISSN: 14620324     EISSN: 14620332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker382     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494-502.
2. Meakin JR, Gregory JS, Smith FW et al. Characterizing the shape of the lumbar spine using an active shape model: reliability and precision of the method. Spine 2008;33: 807-13.
3. Croft P, Cooper C, Wickham C, Coggon D. Defining osteoarthritis of the hip for epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:514-22.
4. Altman RD. Classification of disease: osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1991;20(6 Suppl. 2):40-7.
5. Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D et al. Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1211-7.
6. Patton MS, Duthie RA, Sutherland AG. Proximal femoral geometry and hip fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 2006;72: 51-4.
7. Pulkkinen P, Partanen J, Jalovaara P, Jamsa T. Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:274-80.
8. Gregory JS, Aspden RM. Femoral geometry as a risk factor for osteoporotic hip fracture in men and women. Med Eng Phys 2008;30:1275-86.
9. Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Warden KE et al. Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach. Invest Radiol 1990;25:6-18.
10. Orwoll ES, Marshall LM, Nielson CM et al. Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:475-83.
11. Keaveny TM, Bouxsein ML. Theoretical implications of the biomechanical fracture threshold. J Bone Miner Res 2008; 23:1541-7.
12. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ. Anatomical statistical models and their role in feature extraction. Br J Radiol 2004; 77(Spec 2):S133-9.
13. Roberts M, Cootes T, Pacheco E, Adams J. Quantitative vertebral fracture detection on DXA images using shape and appearance models. Acad Radiol 2007;14:1166-78.
14. Meakin JR, Gregory JS, Aspden RM et al. The intrinsic shape of the human lumbar spine in the supine, standing and sitting postures: characterization using an active shape model. J Anat 2009;215:206-11.
15. Roberts MG, Cootes TF, Adams JE. Vertebral shape: automatic measurement with dynamically sequenced active appearance models. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf 2005;8(Pt 2):733-40.
16. Gregory JS, Testi D, Stewart A et al. A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:5-11.
17. Gregory JS, Waarsing JH, Day J et al. Early identification of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip using an active shape model to quantify changes in bone morphometric features: can hip shape tell us anything about the progression of osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 2007;56: 3634-43.
18. Efford N. Knowledge-based segmentation and feature analysis of hand and wrist radiographs. Proc SPIE 1993; 1905:596-608.
19. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper DH, Graham J. Active shape models- their training and application. Comp Vis Image Understand 1995;61:38-59.
20. Birrell F, Croft P, Cooper C et al. Health impact of pain in the hip region with and without radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis: a study of new attenders to primary care. The PCR Hip Study Group. Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59: 857-63.
21. Birrell F, Croft P, Cooper C et al. Radiographic change is common in new presenters in primary care with hip pain. The PCR Hip Study Group. Rheumatology 2000;39: 772-5.
22. Birrell F, Croft P, Cooper C et al. Predicting radiographic hip osteoarthritis from range of movement. Rheumatology 2001;40:506-12.
23. Birrell F, Silman A, Croft P et al. Syndrome of symptomatic adult acetabular dysplasia (SAAD syndrome). Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:356-8.
24. Croft P. The atlas of standard radiographs of arthritis. Rheumatology 2005;44(Suppl. 4):iv46-72.
25. Altman RD, Gold GE. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007;15(Suppl. A):A1-56.
26. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ. Combining point distribution models with shape models based on finite element analysis. Image Vis Comput 1995;13:403-9.
27. Gregory JS, Stewart A, Undrill PE et al. Identification of hip fracture patients from radiographs using Fourier analysis of the trabecular structure: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Imaging 2004;4:4.
28. Cattell RB. The scree test for a number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1966;1:245-76.
29. Doherty M, Courtney P, Doherty S et al. Nonspherical femoral head shape (pistol grip deformity), neck shaft angle, and risk of hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:3172-82.
30. Lynch JA, Parimi N, Chaganti RK et al. The association of proximal femoral shape and incident radiographic hip OA in elderly women. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:1313-8.
31. Javaid MK, Lane NE, Mackey DC et al. Changes in proximal femoral mineral geometry precede the onset of radiographic hip osteoarthritis: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:2028-36.
32. Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabulae and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. Acta Orthop Scand 1939;58:1-132.
33. Stulberg SD, Cordell LD, Harris WH et al. Unrecognised childhood hip disease: a major cause of idiopathic osteoarthritis of the hip. In: Amstutz HC, ed. In: The Hip: Proceedings of the Third Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society 1975:212-8.
34. Stulberg SD, Harris WH. Acetabular dysplasia and development of osteoarthritis of the hip. In: Harris WH, ed. In: The Hip: Proceedings of the the Second Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society 1974:82-93.
35. Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Palm H et al. A new radiological index for assessing asphericity of the femoral head in cam impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:1309-16.
36. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S. Hip dysplasia: a significant risk factor for the development of hip osteoarthritis. A cross-sectional survey. Rheumatology 2005;44:211-8.
37. Gordon CL, Wu C, Peterfy CG et al. Automated measurement of radiographic hip joint-space width. Med Phys 2001;28:267-77.
38. Lequesne M, Morvan G. Description of the potential of an arthrometer for standard and reduced radiographs suitable to measurement of angles and segments of hip, knee, foot and joint space widths. Joint Bone Spine 2002; 69:282-92.
39. Moore RJ, Fazzalari NL, Manthey BA, Vernon-Roberts B. The relationship between head-neck-shaft angle, calcar width, articular cartilage thickness and bone volume in arthrosis of the hip. Br J Rheumatol 1994;33: 432-6.
40. Conrozier T, Lequesne M, Favret H et al. Measurement of the radiological hip joint space width. An evaluation of various methods of measurement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9:281-6.
41. Resnick D. Patterns of migration of the femoral head in osteoarthritis of the hip. Roentgenographic-pathologic correlation and comparison with rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1975;124: 62-74.
42. Parsons S, Alesci S, Feuerstein G, Wang J. Biomarkers in the development of novel disease-modifying therapies for osteoarthritis. Biomarker Med 2008;2:587-602.