Anatomical statistical models and their role in feature extraction

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 77, Issue SPEC. ISS. 2, 2004, Pages

  Cootes, T F ^a   Taylor, C J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BODY REGIONS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BRAIN; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 14044271545     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/20343922     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. McInerney T, Terzopoulos D. Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey. Medical Image Analysis 1996;1: 91-108.
2. Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. A survey of medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis 1998;2:1-36.
3. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D. Active contour models. Int J Computer Vision 1987;1:321-31.
4. Park J, Mataxas D, Young A, Axel L. Deformable models with parameter functions for cardiac motion analysis from tagged MRI data. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1996;15:278-89.
5. Pentland AP, Sclaroff S. Closed-form solutions for physically based modelling and recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1991;13:715-29.
6. Scott GL. The alternative snake - and other animals. In: 3rd Alvey Vison Conference, Cambridge, England, 1987:341-7.
7. Staib LH, Duncan JS. Boundary finding with parametrically deformable models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1992;14:1061-75.
8. Yuille AL, Cohen DS, Hallinan P. Feature extraction from faces using deformable templates. Int J Computer Vision 1992;8:99-112.
9. Lipson P, Yuille AL, O'Keeffe D, Cavanaugh J, Taaffe J, Rosenthal D. Deformable templates for feature extraction from medical images. In: Faugeras O, editor. 1st European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, 1990:413-7.
10. Bajcsy R, Kovacic S. Multiresolution elastic matching. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 1989;46:1-21.
11. Christensen GE, Rabbitt RD, Miller MI, Joshi SC, Grenander U, Coogan TA, et al. Topological properties of smooth anatomic maps. In: 14th Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, France, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995:101-12.
12. Christensen GE, Joshi SC, Miller M. Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy. IEEE Trans Medical Image 1997;16: 864-77.
13. Kirby M, Sirovich L. Application of the Karhumen-Loeve procedure for the characterization of human faces. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1990;12:103-8.
14. Wang Y, Staib LH. Elastic model based non-rigid registration incorporating statistical shape information. In: MICCAI, 1998:1162-73.
15. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper D, Graham J. Active shape models - their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 1995;61:38-59.
16. Stegmann MB, Fisker R, Ersbøll BK. Extending and applying active appearance models for automated, high precision segmentation in different image modalities. In: Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, 2001:90-7.
17. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ. Combining point distribution models with shape models based on finite element analysis. Image Vision Computing 1995;13:403-9.
18. Cootes TF, Edwards GJ, Taylor CJ. Active appearance models. In: Burkhardt H Neumann B, editors. 5th European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer, Berlin, 1998;2: 484-98.
19. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ. Constrained active appearance models. In: 8th International Conference on Computer Vision, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001;1:748-54.
20. Caunce A, Taylor CJ. 3D point distribution models of the cortical sulci. In: Clark AF, editor. 8th British Machine Vison Conference University of Essex, UK, BMVA Press. 1997: 550-9.
21. Caunce A, Taylor CJ. Using local geometry to build 3D sulcal models. In: 16th Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, 1999:196-209.
22. Fisker R. Making deformable template models operational. PhD thesis, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, 2000.
23. Stegmann MB. Active appearance models: theory, extensions and cases. Master's thesis, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, 2000.
24. Roberts M, Cootes T, Adams J. Linking sequences of active appearance sub-models via constraints: an application in automated vertebral morphometry. In: 14th British Machine Vision Conference, 2003;1:349-58.
25. Brett A, Taylor C. Construction of 3D shape models of femoral articular cartilage using harmonic maps. In: MICCAI, 2000:1205-14.
26. Brett AD, Taylor CJ. A method of automatic landmark generation for automated 3D pdm construction. In: Lewis P, Nixon M, editors. 9th British Machine Vison Conference, Southampton, UK: BMVA Press. 1998;2:914-23.
27. Fleute M, Lavallee S. Building a complete surface model from sparse data using statistical shape models: application to computer assisted knee surgery. In: MICCAI, 1998: 878-87.
28. Brett AD, Taylor CJ. A framework for automated landmark generation for automated 3D statistical model construction. In: 16th Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Visegrad, Hungary, 1999;376-81.
29. Davies R, Twining C, Cootes T, Taylor C. A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modelling. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2002;21:525-37.
30. Rueckert D, Frangi A, Schnabel J. Automatic construction of 3D statistical deformation models using non-rigid registration. In: MICCAI, 2001:77-84.
31. Frangi A, Rueckert D, Schnabel J, Niessen W. Automatic construction of multiple-object three-dimensional statistical shape models: application to cardiac modeling. IEEE-TMI 2002;21:1151-66.
32. Davies RH, Twining CJ, Allen PD, Cootes TF, Taylor CJ. Shape discrimination in the hippocampus using an mdl model. In: 18th Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Springer-Verlag, 2003:38-50.
33. Smyth PP, Taylor CJ, Adams JE. Automatic measurement of vertebral shape using active shape models. In: 7th British Machine Vison Conference Edinburgh, Scotland, BMVA Press. 1996:705-14.
34. Kotcheff A, Redhead A, Taylor C, Hukins D. Shape model analysis of THR radiographs. In: 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society Press 1996;4:391-5.
35. Hill A, Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Lindley K. Medical image interpretation: A generic approach using deformable templates. J Med Informatics 1994;19:47-59.
36. van Ginneken B, Frangi AF, Stall JJ, ter Haar Romeny B. Active shape model segmentation with optimal features. IEEE-TMI 2002;21:924-33.
37. Haslam J, Taylor CJ, Cootes TF. A probabalistic fitness measure for deformable template models. In: Hancock E, editor. 5th British Machine Vison Conference York, England, BMVA Press, Sheffield. 1994:33-42.
38. Mitchell S, Lelieveldt B, van der Geest R, Schaap J, Reiber J, Sonka M. Segmentation of cardiac MR images: an active appearance model approach. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, Feb. 2000.
39. Mitchell S, Boudewijn P, Lelievedt PF, van der Geest R, Bosch H, Reiber J, Sonka M. Time continuous segmentation of cardiac MR image sequences using active appearance motion models. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, Feb. 2001.
40. Thodberg H, Rosholm A. Application of the active shape model in a commercial medical device for bone densitometry. In: Cootes T, Taylor C, editors. 12th British Machine Vison Conference, 2001:43-52.
41. Stegmann MB, Larsson HBW. Fast registration of cardiac perfusion MRI. In: Proc. International Society of Magnetic Resonance In Medicine - ISMRM 2003, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2003:702.