Tools from evolutionary biology shed new light on the diversification of languages

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 167-173

  Levinson, Stephen C ^a,b   Gray, Russell D ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SCIENCE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HUMAN COGNITION; HUMAN LANGUAGE; IDEALIZED MODELS; REALISTIC MODEL; SOCIAL PROCESS;

LINGUISTICS;

BIOLOGY;

BIOLOGY; COGNITION; CULTURAL FACTOR; EVOLUTION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PSYCHOLOGY; RACE DIFFERENCE; REVIEW; SOCIAL STRUCTURE;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84857504487     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.007     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Lewontin, R.C. (1983) Darwin's revolution. New York Review Books 30, 21-27.
2. Felsenstein J. Inferring phylogenies 2004, Sinauer.
3. The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing 2009, Cambridge University press. P. Lemey (Ed.).
4. McMahon A., McMahon R. Language classification by numbers. 2006, Oxford University Press.
5. Darwin C. The descent of man 1871, John Murray.
6. Levinson S. Yélî Dnye and the theory of basic color terms. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 2000, 10:3-55.
7. Friedrich P. Semantic structure and social structure: an instance from Russian. Explorations in cultural anthropology 1964, McGraw-Hill. W. Goodenough (Ed.).
8. Karlsson F. Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. J. Linguist. 2007, 43:365-392.
9. Lycett S.J. 'Most beautiful and most wonderful': Those endless stone tool forms. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 9:143-171.
10. Stout D. Stone tool making and the evolution of human culture and cognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 366:1050-1059.
11. Baker M.C. Atoms of language: The mind's hiden rules of grammar 2001, Basic Books.
12. Di Sciullo A., Boeckx C. The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty 2011, Oxford University Press.
13. Greenberg J. Universals of Language 1963, Cambridge University Press.
14. Dryer M.S. The evidence for word order correlations. Language Typology 2011, 15:335-380.
15. Chomsky, N. (1998) Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15.
16. Naroll R. Two solutions to Galton's Problem. Philos. Sci. 1961, 28:15-29.
17. Barker D., et al. Constrained models of evolution lead to improved prediction of functional linkage from correlated gain and loss of genes. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:14-20.
18. Friston K. The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory?. Natl. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11:127-138.
19. Tenenbaum J.B., et al. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:309-318.
20. Battaglia P.W., et al. Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 2003, 20:1391-1397.
21. Bannard C., et al. Modelling children's early grammatical knowledge. PNAS 2009, 106:17284-17289.
22. Chater N., Manning C. Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:287-291.
23. Dunn M., et al. Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word -order universals. Nature 2011, 473:79-82.
24. Christiansen M., Chater N. Language as shaped by the brain. Behav. Brain Sci. 2008, 31:489-558.
25. Cysouw M. Understanding transition probabilities. Linguist. Typol. 2011, 15:415-432.
26. Croft W., et al. Greenbergian universals, diachrony, and statistical analyses. Linguist. Typol. 2011, 15:433-454.
27. Atkinson Q.D. Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science 2011, 332:346.
28. Blust R. The Austronesian languages 2009, Australian National University.
29. Jaeger T.F., et al. Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology. Linguist. Typol. 2011, 15:281-320.
30. Maddieson I., et al. Geographical distribution of phonological complexity. Linguist. Typol. 2011, 15:267-280.
31. Wichmann S., et al. Phonological diversity, word length, and population sizes across languages: The ASJP evidence. Linguist. Typol. 2011, 15:177-198.
32. Cysouw, M. et al. (in press). Still no evidence for an ancient language expansion from Africa. Science.
33. Nettle D. Linguistic Diversity 1999, Oxford University Press.
34. Evans N., Levinson S. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive Science. Behav. Brain Sci. 2009, 32:429-492.
35. Levinson S., Evans N. Time for a sea-change in linguistics. Response to comments on 'The myth of language universals'. Lingua 2010, 120:2733-2758.
36. Friedrich P. The linguistic reflex of social change: From Tsarist to Soviet Russian kinship. Sociol. Inquiry 1966, 36:159-185.
37. Zipf G.K. The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology 1936, Routledge.
38. Trudgill P. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity 2011, Oxford University Press.
39. Bateson G. Culture contact and Schismogenesis. Man 1935, 35:178-183.
40. Gumperz J.J., Wilson R. Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo Aryan/Dravidian border in India. Pidginization and creolization 1971, 151-167. Cambridge University Press. D. Hymes (Ed.).
41. Atkinson Q.D., et al. Languages evolve in punctuational bursts. Science 2008, 319:588.
42. Henrich J. Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses: The Tasmanian case. American Antiquity 2004, 69:197-214.
43. Lupyan G., Dale R. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e8559.
44. Hay J., Bauer L. Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language 2007, 83:388-400.
45. Dediu D. Are languages really independent from genes? If not, what would a genetic bias affecting language diversity look like?. Hum. Biol. 2011, 83:279-296.
46. Dediu D. A Bayesian phylogenetic approach to estimating the stability of linguistic features and the genetic biasing of tone. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 278:474-479.
47. Dediu D., Ladd R. Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin. PNAS 2007, 104:10944-10949.
48. Kirby S., et al. Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:10681-10686.
49. Smith K. Learning bias, cultural evolution of language and the biological evolution of the language faculty. Hum. Biol. 2011, 83:261-278.
50. Shultz S., Dunbar R.I.M. Encephalization is not a universal macroevolutionary phenomenon in mammals but is associated with sociality. PNAS 2010, 107:21582-21586.
51. Roots of human sociality - culture, cognition and interaction 2006, Berg. N.J. Enfield, S. Levinson (Eds.).
52. Levinson S. On the human 'interactional engine'. Roots of human sociality. Culture, cognition and human interaction 2006, 39-69. Berg. N.J. Enfield, S. Levinson (Eds.).
53. Call J., Tomasello M. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:187-192.
54. Haun D.B.M., et al. Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition. PNAS 2006, 103:17568-17573.
55. Ohms V.R., et al. Zebra finches exhibit speaker-independent phonetic perception of human speech. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 277:1003-1009.
56. Chater N., Christiansen M. Language acquisition meets language evolution. Cogn. Sci. 2010, 34:1131-1157.
57. Levinson, S. (in press) The original sin of cognitive science. Top. Cogn. Sci.
58. Catani M., et al. Symmetries in human brain pathways predict verbal recall. PNAS 2007, 104:17163-17168.
59. Townsend D.J., et al. Familial handedness and access to words, meaning and syntax during sentence comprehension. Brain Lang. 2001, 78:308-331.
60. Papassotiropoulos A., Stephan D.A., et al. Common Kibra Alleles Are Associated with Human Memory Performance. Science 2006, 314:475-478.
61. Valaki C.E., et al. Cortical organization for receptive language functions in Chinese, English and Spanish: A cross-linguistic MEG study. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:967-979.
62. Haun D.B.M., et al. Plasticity of human spatial cognition: Spatial language and cognition covary across cultures. Cognition 2011, 119:70-80.
63. Allen J., et al. Morphology of the Insula in Relation to Hearing Status and Sign Language Experience. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:11900-11905.
64. Petersson K.M., et al. Literacy: A cultural influence on functional left-right differences in the inferior parietal cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 26:791-799.
65. Carreiras M., et al. An anatomical signature for literacy. Nature 2009, 461:983-986.
66. Henrich J., et al. The weirdest people in the world?. Behav. Brain Sci. 2010, 33(2-3):61-83.
67. Gray R.D, Atkinson Q.D. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 2003, 426:435-439.
68. Pagel M., et al. Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature 2007, 449:717-720.
69. Pagel M. Human language as a culturally transmitted replicator. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:405-415.
70. Dunn M., et al. Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science 2005, 309:2072-2075.
71. Collins J., et al. Quantifying hybridization in realistic time. J. Comput. Biol. 2011, 18:1305-1318.
72. Nelson-Sathi S., et al. Networks uncover hidden lexical borrowing in Indo-European language evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 278:1794-1803.
73. Greenhill S.J., et al. Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies?. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 276:2299-2306.
74. Bowern C., et al. Does lateral transmission obscure inheritance in hunter-gatherer languages?. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e25195.
75. Bouchard-Côté A., et al. Improved reconstruction of protolanguage word forms. NAACL09 2009, 65-73.
76. Lydia S., et al. A pipeline for computational historical linguistics. Lang. Dyn. Change 2011, 1:89-127.