The impact of structured discussion on students' attitudes and dispositions toward argumentation

Learning by Effective Utilization of Technologies: Facilitating Intercultural Understanding, Proceeding of the 14th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Hong, Khai Seng ^a   Brudvik, Ole C ^a   Chee, Yam San ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Critical thinking; CSCA; Student attitudes

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; CRITICAL THINKING; CSCA; DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL RESULTS; HIGHER ORDER; METACOGNITIVES; MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; STUDENT ATTITUDES; STUDENT ESSAYS; WEB-BASED DISCUSSION;

SCAFFOLDS; SURVEYS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84857483393     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
2. Kirschner, P. A., Buckingham Shum, S. J., & Carr, C. (eds.) (2003). Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer.
3. Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C., & Johnson, J. (2004). Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings (6th edn.). Pearson Longman.
4. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84 (3), 287-313.
5. Tay, M. H., Hooi, C. M., & Chee, Y. S. (2002). Discourse-based learning using a multimedia discussion forum. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Computers in Education, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 93-94. IEEE Computer Society.
6. Guzdial, M. & Turns, J. (2000). Computer-supported collaborative learning in engineering: The challenge of scaling-up assessment. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (eds.), Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education, pp. 227-257. Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3 (3), 265-283.
8. Suthers, D. (1998). Representations for scaffolding collaborative inquiry on ill-structured problems. Paper presented at the 1998 AERA Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
9. Cho, K. L. & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. ETR&D, 50 (3), 5-22.
10. Jonassen, D. & Remidez, H. Jr. (2005). Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conferences. Int. J. Knowledge and Learning, 1 (1/2), 113-129.
11. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Stegmann, K. (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: Scripts for argumentative knowledge construction in distributed groups. In Proceedings of CSCL 2005.
12. Tan, S. C. (2000). Supporting collaborative problem solving through computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
13. Toulmin, S. (1958/2003). The Uses of Argument (updated edn.). Cambridge University Press.
14. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R. and Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
15. Zellermayer, M., Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Givon, H. (1991). Enhancing writing-related metacognitions through a computerized writing partner. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 373-391.
16. Howard, G. S. (1980). Response shift bias - a problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post self-reports. Evaluation Review. 4(1), 93-106.
17. Rockwell, S. K. & Kohn, H. (1989). Post-then pre evaluation. Journal of Extension. 27(2), 19-21.
18. Rohs, F.R. & Langone, CA. (1997). Increased Accuracy in Measuring Leadership Impacts. Journal of Leadership Studies. 4(1), 150-159.