Expression profiles of cohesins, shugoshins and spindle assembly checkpoint genes in rhesus macaque oocytes predict their susceptibility for aneuploidy during embryonic development

Cell Cycle

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 740-748

  Dupont, Catherine ^a   Harvey, Alexandra J ^a,d   Armant, D Randall ^a,b   Zelinski, Mary B ^c   Brenner, Carol A ^a,e  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^e EDWARD VIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Chromosomal abnormalities; Cohesin; Oocytes; Shugoshins; Spindle assembly checkpoint

Indexed keywords

BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; BUB1B PROTEIN; BUB3 PROTEIN; COHESIN; MAD2L1 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; RAD21 PROTEIN; REC8 PROTEIN; SGOL1 PROTEIN; SGOL2 PROTEIN; SMC1 PROTEIN; SMC1A PROTEIN; SMC1B PROTEIN; SMC3 PROTEIN; STROMAL ANTIGEN 1; STROMAL ANTIGEN 2; STROMAL ANTIGEN 3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMATID; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MACACA; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; PREDICTION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

MACACA MULATTA; PRIMATES;

EID: 84857462017     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.11.4.19207     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Benadiva CA, Kligman I, Munné S. Aneuploidy 16 in human embryos increases significantly with maternal age. Fertil Steril 1996; 66:248-55; PMID:8690111.
2. Dupont C, Bavister BD, Armant DR, Brenner CA. Rhesus macaque embryos derived from MI oocytes maturing after retrieval display high rates of chromosomal anomalies. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:929-35; PMID:19106174; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den429.
3. Dupont C, Froenicke L, Lyons LA, Bavister BD, Brenner CA. Chromosomal instability in rhesus macaque preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril 2009; 91:1230-7; PMID:18440514; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.075.
4. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Munné S, Ferraretti AP. Incidence of chromosomal abnormalities from a morphologically normal cohort of embryos in poor-prognosis patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998; 15:297-301; PMID:9604763; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022596528036.
5. Márquez C, Sandalinas M, Bahçe M, Alikani M, Munné S. Chromosome abnormalities in 1,255 cleavage- stage human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2000; 1:17-26; PMID:12804207; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1472- 6483(10)61988-8.
6. Munné S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J, Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril 1995; 64:382-91; PMID:7615118.
7. Pellicer A, Rubio C, Vidal F, Mínguez Y, Giménez C, Egozcue J, et al. In vitro fertilization plus preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with recurrent miscarriage: an analysis of chromosome abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril 1999; 71:1033-9; PMID:10360906; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00143-0.
8. Rubio C, Simón C, Vidal F, Rodrigo L, Pehlivan T, Remohí J, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:182-8; PMID:12525464; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg015.
9. Voullaire L, Collins V, Callaghan T, McBain J, Williamson R, Wilton L. High incidence of complex chromosome abnormality in cleavage embryos from patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2007; 87:1053-8; PMID:17418829; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.043.
10. Watson AJ. Oocyte cytoplasmic maturation: a key mediator of oocyte and embryo developmental competence. J Anim Sci 2007; 85:1-3; PMID:17322120; http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-432.
11. Nasmyth K, Haering CH. The structure and function of SMC and kleisin complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 2005; 74:595-648; PMID:15952899; http://dx.doi. org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133219.
12. Onn I, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Guacci V, Unal E, Koshland DE. Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2008; 24:105-29; PMID:18616427; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio. 24.110707.175350.
13. Hauf S, Roitinger E, Koch B, Dittrich CM, Mechtler K, Peters JM. Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol 2005; 3:69; PMID:15737063; http://dx.doi. org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030069.
14. Sumara I, Vorlaufer E, Gieffers C, Peters BH, Peters JM. Characterization of vertebrate cohesin complexes and their regulation in prophase. J Cell Biol 2000; 151:749-62; PMID:11076961; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.151.4.749.
15. Uhlmann F, Wernic D, Poupart MA, Koonin EV, Nasmyth K. Cleavage of cohesin by the CD clan protease separin triggers anaphase in yeast. Cell 2000; 103:375-86; PMID:11081625; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00130-6.
16. Watanabe Y. Modifying sister chromatid cohesion for meiosis. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:4017-23; PMID:15316077; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01352.
17. Watanabe Y. Sister chromatid cohesion along arms and at centromeres. Trends Genet 2005; 21:405-12; PMID:15946764; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig. 2005.05.009.
18. Watanabe Y. Shugoshin: guardian spirit at the centromere. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005; 17:590-5; PMID:16229998; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2005.10.003.
19. Hoyt MA, Totis L, Roberts BTS. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 1991; 66:507-17; PMID:1651171; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3.
20. Li R, Murray AW. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 1991; 66:519-31; PMID:1651172; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5.
21. Peters JM. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:644-56; PMID:16896351; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nrm1988.
22. Peters JM. The anaphase-promoting complex: proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol Cell 2002; 9:931-43; PMID:12049731; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097- 2765(02)00540-3.
23. Steuerwald N, Cohen J, Herrera RJ, Sandalinas M, Brenner CA. Association between spindle assembly checkpoint expression and maternal age in human oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 2001; 7:49-55; PMID:11134360; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ molehr/7.1.49.
24. Steuerwald NM, Bermúdez MG, Wells D, MunnéS, Cohen J. Maternal age-related differential global expression profiles observed in human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14:700-8; PMID:17579982; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60671-2.
25. Wells D, Bermúdez MG, Steuerwald N, Malter HE, Thornhill AR, Cohen J. Association of abnormal morphology and altered gene expression in human preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril 2005; 84:343-55; PMID:16084875; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. fertnstert.2005.01.143.
26. Wells D, Bermudez MG, Steuerwald N, Thornhill AR, Walker DL, Malter H, et al. Expression of genes regulating chromosome segregation, the cell cycle and apoptosis during human preimplantation development. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:1339-48; PMID:15705620; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh778.
27. Nichols SM, Gierbolini L, Gonzalez-Martinez JA, Bavister BD. Effects of in vitro maturation and age on oocyte quality in the rhesus macaque Macaca mulatta. Fertil Steril 2010; 93:1591-600; PMID:19249021; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.141.
28. Mailhes JB. Faulty spindle checkpoint and cohesion protein activities predispose oocytes to premature chromosome separation and aneuploidy. Environ Mol Mutagen 2008; 49:642-58; PMID:18626998; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/em.20412.
29. McGuinness BE, Anger M, Kouznetsova A, Gil-Bernabé AM, Helmhart W, Kudo NR, et al. Regulation of APC/C activity in oocytes by a Bub1-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 2009; 19:369-80; PMID:19249208; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2009.01.064.
30. Duncan FE, Chiang T, Schultz RM, Lampson MA. Evidence that a defective spindle assembly checkpoint is not the primary cause of maternal age-associated aneuploidy in mouse eggs. Biol Reprod 2009; 81:768-76; PMID:19553597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod. 109.077909.
31. Pan H, Ma P, Zhu W, Schultz RM. Age-associated increase in aneuploidy and changes in gene expression in mouse eggs. Dev Biol 2008; 316:397-407; PMID:18342300; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.01.048.
32. Sun SC, Lee SE, Xu YN, Kim NH. Perturbation of Spc25 expression affects meiotic spindle organization, chromosome alignment and spindle assembly checkpoint in mouse oocytes. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:4552- 9; PMID:21084868; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.22.13815.
33. Wei L, Liang XW, Zhang QH, Li M, Yuan J, Li S, et al. BubR1 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein regulating meiotic cell cycle progression of mouse oocyte. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:1112-21; PMID:20237433; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc. 9.6.10957.
34. Zhang QH, Wei L, Tong JS, Qi ST, Li S, Ou XH, et al. Localization and function of mSpindly during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:2230-6; PMID:20505367; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.11.11895.
35. Zhu JL, Lin SL, Li M, Ouyang YC, Hou Y, Schatten H, et al. Septin2 is modified by SUMOylation and required for chromosome congression in mouse oocytes. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:1607-16; PMID:20372094; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/ cc.9.8.11463.
36. Bean CJ, Hassold TJ, Judis L, Hunt PA. Fertilization in vitro increases non-disjunction during early cleavage divisions in a mouse model system. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:2362-7; PMID:12202426; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.9. 2362.
37. Ghiselli G. SMC3 knockdown triggers genomic instability and p53-dependent apoptosis in human and zebrafish cells. Mol Cancer 2006; 5:52; PMID:17081288; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-5-52.
38. Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 1997; 91:35-45; PMID:9335333; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80007-6.
39. Sonoda E, Matsusaka T, Morrison C, Vagnarelli P, Hoshi O, Ushiki T, et al. Scc1/Rad21/Mcd1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion and kinetochore function in vertebrate cells. Dev Cell 2001; 1:759-70; PMID:11740938; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1534- 5807(01)00088-0.
40. Vass S, Cotterill S, Valdeolmillos AM, Barbero JL, Lin E, Warren WD, et al. Depletion of Drad21/Scc1 in Drosophila cells leads to instability of the cohesin complex and disruption of mitotic progression. Curr Biol 2003; 13:208-18; PMID:12573216; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00047-2.
41. Gómez R, Valdeolmillos A, Parra MT, Viera A, Carreiro C, Roncal F, et al. Mammalian SGO2 appears at the inner centromere domain and redistributes depending on tension across centromeres during meiosis II and mitosis. EMBO Rep 2007; 8:173-80; PMID:17205076; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ sj.embor.7400877.
42. Lee J, Kitajima TS, Tanno Y, Yoshida K, Morita T, Miyano T, et al. Unified mode of centromeric protection by shugoshin in mammalian oocytes and somatic cells. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:42-52; PMID:18084284; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb1667.
43. Llano E, Gómez R, Gutiérrez-Caballero C, Herrán Y, Sánchez-Martín M, Vázquez-Quiñones L, et al. Shugoshin-2 is essential for the completion of meiosis but not for mitotic cell division in mice. Genes Dev 2008; 22:2400-13; PMID:18765791; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.475308.
44. Suja JA. Fighting of Casein kinase 1 and PP2A/ Shugoshin for cohesins during meiosis I. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:2929-30; PMID:20740713; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.15.12696.
45. Vogt E, Kirsch-Volders M, Parry J, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Spindle formation, chromosome segregation and the spindle checkpoint in mammalian oocytes and susceptibility to meiotic error. Mutat Res 2008; 651:14-29; PMID:18096427.
46. Kitajima TS, Hauf S, Ohsugi M, Yamamoto T, Watanabe Y. Human Bub1 defines the persistent cohesion site along the mitotic chromosome by affecting Shugoshin localization. Curr Biol 2005; 15:353-9; PMID:15723797; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.044.
47. Sharp-Baker H, Chen RH. Spindle checkpoint protein Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3 and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity. J Cell Biol 2001; 153:1239-50; PMID:11402067; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/ jcb.153.6.1239.
48. Tang Z, Sun Y, Harley SE, Zou H, Yu H. Human Bub1 protects centromeric sister-chromatid cohesion through Shugoshin during mitosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:18012-7; PMID:15604152; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408600102.
49. Gjoerup OV, Wu J, Chandler-Militello D, Williams GL, Zhao J, Schaffhausen B, et al. Surveillance mechanism linking Bub1 loss to the p53 pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:8334-9; PMID:17488820; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.0703164104.
50. McGuinness BE, Hirota T, Kudo NR, Peters JM, Nasmyth K. Shugoshin prevents dissociation of cohesin from centromeres during mitosis in vertebrate cells. PLoS Biol 2005; 3:86; PMID:15737064; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.0030086.
51. Salic A, Waters JC, Mitchison TJ. Vertebrate shugoshin links sister centromere cohesion and kinetochore microtubule stability in mitosis. Cell 2004; 118:567-78; PMID:15339662; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.016.
52. Guglielmino MR, Santonocito M, Vento M, Ragusa M, Barbagallo D, Borzì P, et al. TAp73 is downregulated in oocytes from women of advanced reproductive age. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:3253-6; PMID:21946516; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.19.17585.
53. Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Crippa A, Lappi M, Feliciani E, Gianaroli L. First meiosis errors in immature oocytes generated by stimulated cycles. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:629-35; PMID:16793041; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2006.02.083.
54. Strassburger D, Goldstein A, Friedler S, Raziel A, Kasterstein E, Mashevich M, et al. The cytogenetic constitution of embryos derived from immature (metaphase I) oocytes obtained after ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:971-8; PMID:19505687; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2009.04.035.
55. Cekleniak NA, Combelles CM, Ganz DA, Fung J, Albertini DF, Racowsky C. A novel system for in vitro maturation of human oocytes. Fertil Steril 2001; 75:1185-93; PMID:11384647; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01789-7.
56. Jones GM, Cram DS, Song B, Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Lacham-Kaplan O, et al. Gene expression profiling of human oocytes following in vivo or in vitro maturation. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:1138-44; PMID:18346995; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1093/humrep/den085.
57. Chaffin CL, Stouffer RL. Role of gonadotrophins and progesterone in the regulation of morphological remodelling and atresia in the monkey peri-ovulatory follicle. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:2489-95; PMID:11098016; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1093/humrep/15.12.2489.
58. Zelinski-Wooten MB, Hutchison JS, Hess DL, Wolf DP, Stouffer RL. Follicle stimulating hormone alone supports follicle growth and oocyte development in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonisttreated monkeys. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:1658-66; PMID:8582957.
59. Bavister BD, Boatman DE, Collins K, Dierschke DJ, Eisele SG. Birth of rhesus monkey infant after in vitro fertilization and nonsurgical embryo transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81:2218-22; PMID:6326113; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.7.2218.
60. Bavister BD, Boatman DE, Leibfried L, Loose M, Vernon MW. Fertilization and cleavage of rhesus monkey oocytes in vitro. Biol Reprod 1983; 28:983-99; PMID:6683110; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod28.4.983.
61. Wolf DP, Vandevoort CA, Meyer-Haas GR, Zelinski- Wooten MB, Hess DL, Baughman WL, et al. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in the rhesus monkey. Biol Reprod 1989; 41:335-46; PMID:2508776; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1095/ biolreprod41.2.335.
62. Bavister BD, Yanagimachi. The effects of sperm extracts and energy sources on the motility and acrosome reaction of hamster spermatozoa in vitro. Biol Reprod 1977; 16:228-37; PMID:831847; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/ biolreprod16.2.228.