Biological characterization of woven fabric using two- and three-dimensional cell cultures

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 100 A, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 882-893

  Moczulska, M ^a   Bitar, M ^b,c   Swieszkowski W ^a   Bruinink, A ^b  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b SWISS FEDERAL LABORATORIES FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^c NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

3D; fibroblast; osteoblast; polyamide 6.6; polyethylene terephthalat; reaggregate; scaffold; textile

Indexed keywords

3-D CELL CULTURE; 3D; 3D CULTURE; BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION; CELL BEHAVIORS; CELL POPULATIONS; CULTURE SYSTEMS; CYTOCOMPATIBILITY; FIBER DIAMETERS; IMPLANT MATERIALS; IN-VITRO; IN-VITRO BIOACTIVITY; IN-VIVO; POLYAMIDE 6.6; REAGGREGATE; SINGLE CELLS; TEST MATERIALS; THREE DIMENSIONAL CELL CULTURE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D); TISSUE IMPLANTS; WOVEN FABRICS;

BIOACTIVITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; FIBROBLASTS; OSTEOBLASTS; POLYETHYLENES; RATING; SCAFFOLDS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TEXTILES; THERMOPLASTICS; TISSUE; WEAVING;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

POLYAMIDE; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL POPULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE;

CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; OSTEOBLASTS;

EID: 84857363321     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34023     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Hwang CM, Park Y, Park JY, Lee K, Sun K, Khademhosseini A, Lee SH,. Controlled cellular orientation on PLGA microfibers with defined diameters. Biomed Microdev 2009; 11: 739-746.
2. Boyan BD, Lohmann CH, Romero J, Schwartz Z,. Bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Clin Plast Surg 1999; 26: 629-645.
3. Hutmacher DW,. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 2529-2543.
4. Holtorf HL, Datta N, Jansen JA, Mikos AG,. Scaffold mesh size affects the osteoblastic differentiation of seeded marrow stromal cells cultured in a flow perfusion bioreactor. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 74: 171-180.
5. Sun T, Norton D, Ryan AJ, MacNeil S, Haycock JW,. Investigation of fibroblast and keratinocyte cell-scaffold interactions using a novel 3D cell culture system. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 321-328.
6. Ichinohe N, Takamoto T, Tabata Y,. Proliferation, osteogenic differentiation, and distribution of rat bone marrow stromal cells in nonwoven fabrics by different culture methods. Tissue Eng A 2008; 14: 107-116.
7. Wan H, Williams RL, Doherty PJ, Williams DF,. A study of cell behaviour on the surfaces of multifilament materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997; 8: 45-51.
8. François S, Chakfé N, Durand B, Laroche G,. Effect of polyester prosthesis micro-texture on endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2008; 22: 93-103.
9. Yang Y, Bolikal D, Becker ML, Kohn J, Zeiger DN, Simon CG,. Combinatorial polymer scaffold libraries for screening cell-biomaterial interactions in 3D. Adv Mater 2008; 20: 2037-2043.
10. Hillmann G, Gebert A, Geurtsen W,. Matrix expression and proliferation of primary gingival fibroblasts in a three dimensional cell culture model. J Cell Sci 1999; 112: 2823-2832.
11. Ouyang A, Ng R, Yang ST,. Long-term culturing of undifferentiated embryonic stem cells in conditioned media and three-dimensional fibrous matrices without extracellular matrix coating. Stem Cells 2007; 25: 447-454.
12. Fischbach C, Kong HJ, Hsiong SX, Evangelista MB, Yuen W, Mooney DJ,. Cancer cell angiogenic capability is regulated by 3D culture and integrin engagement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 399-404.
13. Davila JC, Lautsch EV, Palmer TE,. Some physical factors affecting the acceptance of synthetic materials as tissue implants. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1968; 146: 138-147.
14. Sanders JE, Lamont SE, Karchin A, Golledge SL, Ratner BD,. Fibro-porous meshes made from polyurethane micro-fibers: Effects of surface charge on tissue response. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 813-818.
15. Sun T, Norton D, McKean RJ, Haycock JW, Ryan AJ, MacNeil S,. Development of a 3D cell culture system for investigating cell interactions with electrospun fibers. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007; 97: 1318-1328.
16. Feldman DS, Hultman SM, Colaizzo RS, von Recum AF,. Electron microscope investigation of soft tissue ingrowth into Dacron® velour with dogs. Biomaterials 1983; 4: 105-111.
17. Sanders JE, Lamont SE, Mitchell SB, Malcolm SG,. Small fiber diameter fibro-porous meshes: Tissue response sensitivity to fiber spacing. J Biomed Mater Res 2005; 72A: 335-342.
18. Sanders JE, Bale SD, Neuman T,. Tissue response to microfibers of different polymers: Polyester, polyethylene, polylactic acid, and polyurethane. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 62: 222-227.
19. Woodfield TB, Malda J, Wijn J, Peters F, Riesle J, Blitterswijk CA,. Design of porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering using a three-dimensional fiber-deposition technique. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4149-4161.
20. Cay A, Atav R, Duran K., Effects of warp-weft density variation and fabric porosity of the cotton fabrics on their colour in reactive dyeing. Fibers Text Eastern Eur 2007; 15: 91-94.
21. Bruinink A, Siragusano D, Ettel G, Brandsberg T, Brandsberg F, Petitmermet M, Müller B, Mayer J, Wintermantel E,. The stiffness of bone marrow cell-knit composites is increased during mechanical load. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 3169-3178.
22. Bruinink A,. Serum-free monolayer cultures of embryonic chick brain and retina: Immunoassays of developmental markers, mathematical data analysis and establishment of optimal culture conditions. In:, Zbinden G, editor. The Brain in Bits and Pieces. Zollikon: MTC Verlag; 1992. p 23-30.
23. Bruinink A, Wintermantel E,. Grooves affect primary bone marrow but not osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cell cultures. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 2465-2473.
24. Williams DF,. Definitions in Biomaterials. Chester, England: Elsevier; 1987.
25. Benigni R, Bossa C, Guilliani A, Tcheremenskaia O,. Exploring in vitro/in vivo correlation: Lessons learned from analyzing phase I results of the US EPA's ToxCast project. J Environ Sci Health C 2010; 28: 272-286.
26. Habibovic P, Woodfield T, de GK, Blitterswijk CV,. Predictive value of in vitro and in vivo assays in bone and cartilage repair-What do they really tell us about the clinical performance? Adv Exp Med Biol 2007; 585: 327-360.
27. Baron MJ, Tsai C-J, Donahue SW,. Mechanical stimulation mediates gene expression in MC3T3 osteoblastic cells differently in 2D and 3D environments. J Biomech Eng 2010; 132: e041005.
28. Goldstein AS,. Effect of seeding osteoprogenitor cells as dense clsuters on cell growth and differentiation. Tissue Eng 2001; 7: 817-827.
29. Schuler M, Hamilton DW, Kunzler TP, Sprecher CM, de Wild M, Brunette DM, Textor M, Tosatti SG,. Comparison of the response of cultured osteoblasts and osteoblasts outgrown from rat calvarial bone chips to nonfouling KRSR and FHRRIKA-peptide modified rough titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 91: 517-527.
30. Sutherland RM,. Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: The multicell spheroid model. Science 1988; 8: 177-184.
31. Khaitan D, Dwarakanath BS,. Multicellular spheroids as an in vitro model in experimental oncology: Applications in translational medicine. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2006; 1: 663-675.
32. Wei J, Yoshinari M,. Adhesion of mouse fibroblasts on hexamethyldisiloxane surfaces with wide range of wettability. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 81: 66-75.
33. Wei J, Igarashi T, Okumori N, Igarashi T, Maetani T, Liu B, Yoahinari M,. Influence of surface wettability on competitive protein adsorpton and initial attachement of osteoblast. Biomed Mater 2009; 4: 045002.
34. Drachev AI, Gil'man AB, Pak VM, Kuznetsov AA,. Low-frequency glow discharge treatment of amorphous poly(ethylene terephthalate) films. High Energy Chem 2006; 40: 417-420.
35. Schneider GB, English A, Abraham M, Zaharias R, Stanford C, Keller J,. The effect of hydrogel chrage density on cell attachment. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 3023-3028.
36. Lee JH, Jung HW, Kang IK, Lee HB,. Cell behaviour on polymer surfaces with different functional groups. Biomaterials 1994; 15: 705-711.
37. Hamdan M, Blanco L, Kharaisat A, Tresguerres IF,. Influence of titanium surface charge on fibroblast adhesion. Clin Implant Dent Release Res 2006; 8: 32-38.
38. Guth K, Campion C, Buckland T, Hing KA,. Surface physiochemistry affects protein adsorption to stoichiometric and silicate-substituted microporous hydroxyapatites. Adv Biomater 2010; 12: B113-B121.
39. Karamuk E, Mayer J, Raeber G,. Tissue engineered composite of a woven fabric scaffold with tendon cells, response on mechanical simulation in vitro. Biocomp Mater Sci Eng 2004; 64: 885-891.
40. Weyhe D, Schmitz I, Belyaev O, Grabs R, Muller KM, Uhl W, Zumtobel V,. Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: Less weight does not mean less biological response. World J Surg 2006; 30: 1586-1591.
41. Dunn GA, Heath JP,. A new hypothesis of contact guidance in tissue cells. Exp Cell Res 1976; 101: 1-14.
42. Sun T, Smallwood R, Macneil S,. Development of a mini 3D cell culture system using well defined nickel grids for the investigation of cell scaffold interactions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009; 20: 1483-1493.
43. Kaiser JP, Reinmann A, Bruinink A,. The effect of topographic characteristics on cell migration velocity. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 5230-5241.
44. Hadjipanayi E, Mudera V, Brown RA,. Guiding cell migration in 3D: A collagen matrix graded directional stiffness. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2009; 66: 121-128.
45. Walboomers F, Paquay CGJ, Jansen JA,. A new titanium fiber mesh-cuffed peritoneal dialysis cather: Evaluation and comparison with a dacron-cuffed tenckhoff cather in goats. Peritoneal Dial Int 2001; 21: 254-262.
46. Augsten M, Hägglöf C, Olsson E, Stolz C, Tsagozis P, Levchenko T, Frederick MJ, Borg A, Micke P, Egevad L, Ostman A,. CXCL14 is an autocrine growth factor for fibroblasts and acts as a multi-modal stimulator of prostate tumor growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 3414-3419.