Influence of titanium surface charge on fibroblast adhesion

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 32-38

  Hamdan, Mohammad ^a   Blanco, Luis ^b   Khraisat, Ameen ^c,d   Tresguerres, Isabel F ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN   (Jordan)

^d Alameryah Suburb   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Cell attachment; Fibroblast adhesion; Implant surface; Titanium surface charge

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744930142     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/j.6480.2005.00028.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baxter LC, Frauchigar V, Textor M, Gwynn I, Richards RG. Fibroblast and osteoblast adhesion and morphology on calcium phosphate surfaces. Eur Cell Mater 2002; 30:1-17.
2. Yamamoto K, Yamamoto M, Ooka H. Changes in negative surface charge of human diploid fibroblasts, TIG-1, during in vitro aging. Mech Ageing Dev 1988; 42:183-195.
3. Somosy Z, Kubasova T, Ecsedi GS, Koteles GJ. Radiation-induced changes of negative charge on the cell surface of primary human fibroblasts. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 1986; 49:969-978.
4. Becker WM, Kleinsmith LJ, Hardin J. The world of the cell. 5th ed. San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings, 2003.
5. Kapur R, Lilien J, Black J. Field-dependent fibroblast orientation on charged surfaces is independent of polarity and adsorbed serum proteins. Biomaterials 1993; 14:854-860.
6. Curtis AS. The mechanism of adhesion of cells to glass. A study by interference reflection microscopy. J Cell Biol 1964; 20:199-215.
7. Burridge K, Path K. Focal contacts: transmembrane links between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Bioessays 1989; 10:104-108.
8. Heath JP, Dunn GA. Cell to substratum contacts of chick fibroblasts and their relation to the microfilament system. A correlated interference-reflexion and high-voltage electron-microscope study. J Cell Sci 1978; 29:197-212.
9. Burridge K, Fath K, Kelly T, Nuckolls G, Turner C. Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1988; 4:487-525.
10. Okumura A, Goto M, Goto T, et al. Substrate affects the initial attachment and subsequent behavior of human osteoblastic cells (Saos-2). Biomaterials 2001; 22:2263-2271.
11. Geiger B, Tokuyasu KT, Dutton AH, Singer SJ. Vinculin, an intracellular protein localized at specialized sites where microfilament bundles terminate at cell membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1980; 77:4127-4131.
12. Comut AA, Weber HP, Shortkroff S, Cui FZ, Spector M. Connective tissue orientation around dental implants in a canine model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:433-440.
13. Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2003.
14. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban B. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol 1961; 32:261.
15. Stern IB. Current concepts of the dentogingival junction: the epithelial and connective tissue attachments to the tooth. J Periodontol 1981; 52:465-476.
16. Antonio N. TenCate's oral histology: development, structure and function. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2003.
17. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991; 2:81-90.
18. Buser D, Weber HP, Donath K, Fiorellini JP, Paquette DW, Williams RC. Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs. J Periodontol 1992; 63:225-235.
19. Listgarten MA, Buser D, Steinemann SG, Donath K, Lang NP, Weber HP. Light and transmission electron microscopy of the intact interfaces between non-submerged titanium-coated epoxy resin implants and bone or gingival [published erratum appears in J Dent Res 1992; 71:1267]. J Dent Res 1992; 71:364-371.
20. Chavrier C, Couble ML, Hartmann DJ. Qualitative study of collagenous and noncollagenous glycoproteins of the human healthy keratinized mucosa surrounding implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5:117-124.
21. Ruggeri A, Franchi M, Trisi P, Piattelli A. Histologic and ultrastructural findings of gingival circular ligament surrounding osseointegrated non-submerged loaded titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:636-643.
22. Warshawsky H. The teeth. In: Weiss L, ed. Cell and tissue biology. 6th ed. Baltimore, MD: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1988:608-610.
23. 3 surfaces. Mater Sci Eng A 1998; 243:221-230.
24. Sutherland DS, Forshaw PD, Allen GC, Brown IT, Williams KR. Surface analysis of titanium implants. Biomaterials 1993; 14:893-899.
25. Cacciafesta P, Humphris AD, Jandt KD, Miles MJ. Human plasma fibrinogen adsorption on ultraflat titanium oxide surfaces studied with atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 2000; 16:8167-8175.
26. Richards RG. The effect of surface roughness on fibroblast adhesion in vitro. Injury 1996; 27(Suppl 3):SC38-SC43.
27. Sagvolden G, Giaever I, Pettersen EO, Feder J. Cell adhesion force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:471-476.
28. Qiu Q, Sayer M, Kawaja M, Shen X, Davies JE. Attachment, morphology, and protein expression of rat marrow stromal cells cultured on charged substrate surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 42:117-127.
29. Dufrene YF, Marchal TG, Rouxhet PG. Influence of substratum surface properties on the organization of adsorbed collagen films: in situ characterization by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 1999; 15:2871-2878.
30. Kapur R, Rudolph AS. Cellular and cytoskeleton morphology and strength of adhesion of cells on self-assembled monolayers of organosilanes. Exp Cell Res 1998; 244:275-285.
31. Hallab XJ, Bundy KJ, O'Connor K, Moses RL, Jacobs JJ. Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion. Tissue Eng 2001; 7:55-71.
32. Webb K, Hlady V, Tresco PA. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 41:422-430.
33. De Rosa M, Carteni' M, Petillo O, et al. Cationic polyelectrolyte hydrogel fosters fibroblast spreading, proliferation, and extracellular matrix production: implications for tissue engineering. J Cell Physiol 2004; 198:133-143.
34. Wegener J, Keese CR, Giaever I. Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) as a noninvasive means to monitor the kinetics of cell spreading to artificial surfaces. Exp Cell Res 2000; 259:158-166.
35. Massia SP, Hubbell JA. Immobilized amines and basic amino acids as mimetic heparin-binding domains for cell surface proteoglycan-mediated adhesion. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:10133-10141.