Effects of on-line collaborative argumentation processes on justifications

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 207-214

  Lu, Jingyan ^a   Chiu, Ming Ming ^b   Law, Nancy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE ARGUMENTATIONS; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; ORDERED LOGIT; SYSTEM OF EQUATIONS; VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIONS;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84857360007     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M. J., & Suthers, D. (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognition. In J. Andriessen, M. J. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.)A, rguing to learn: confronting cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environment (pp. 1-25). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Barrett, E., & Lally, V. (1999). Gender differences in an online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15(1), 48-60.
3. Brem, S. K., & Rips, L. J. (2000). Explanation and evidence in informal argumentC. ognitive Science, 24(4), 573-604.
4. Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2003). Rudeness and status effects during group problem solving: Do they bias evaluations and reduce the likelihood of correctsolutions? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 506-523.
5. Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321.
6. Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
7. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the aplpication of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.
8. Glassner, A., Weinstoc, M., & Neuman, Y. (2005). Pupils' evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 105-118.
9. Hakkarainen, K. (1998). Epistemology of scientific inquiry and compute-rsupported collaborative learning. Unpublished Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
10. Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6(2), 199-220.
11. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge buildingC. ognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48 - 94.
12. Holtgraves, T. (1997). YES, BUT ⋯ Positive politeness in conversation argumentsJ. ournal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 222-239.
13. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: University Press.
14. Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12(1), 1-8.
15. Kuhn, D., & Pearsall, S. (2000). Developmental origins of scientific thinking Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 113-127.
16. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (Eds.). (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Lipponen, L. (2000). Towards knowledge building: From facts to explanations in primary students' computer mediated discourse Learning Environments Research, 3, 179-199.
18. Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2001). Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science, 29(2), 127-153.
19. Meyers, R. A., Brashers, D. E., Winston, L., & Grob, L. (1997). Sex differences and group argument: A theoretical framework and empirical investigation. Communication Studies, 48(1), 19-41.
20. Perkins, D. N., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In J. Voss, D. Perkins & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Phillips, S. (1972). Paaicipant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom. In C. B. Cazden, V. P. John & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 370-394). New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes In M. J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Saab, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van Hout Wolters, B. H. (2005). Communication in collaborative discovery learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75, 603-621.
24. Scardamalis, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABX-CLIO Inc.
25. Schwarz, B. B., & Glassner, A. (2003). The blind and the paralytic: supporting argumentation in everyday and scientific issues. In Jerry Andriessen, Michael Baker & D. D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognition in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 227-260). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Tapper, J. (1996). Exchange patterns in the oral discourse of international students in nuiversity classrooms. Discourse Processes, 22(1), 25-55.
27. Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The use of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Representational tools in compute-srupported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 485 - 521.
30. van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboratioonf conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311-330.
31. Van Eemeren, F., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2002) Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
32. Veerman, A. (2003). Constructive discussions through electronic dialogue. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 117-143). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academi cPublishers.
33. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71.
34. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (in press). Designing for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences.