Handsome wants as handsome does: Physical attractiveness and gender differences in revealed sexual preferences

Biodemography and Social Biology

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 221-257

  McClintock, Elizabeth Aura ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COURTSHIP; DECISION MAKING; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALITY; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; BEAUTY; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COURTSHIP; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857286633     PISSN: 19485565     EISSN: 19485573     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19485565.2011.615172     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Alexander, M. G., and T. D. Fisher. 2003. Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. J Sex Res 40(1):27-35. (Pubitemid 36514643)
2. Baumeister, R. F., and J. M. Twenge. 2002. Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Rev Genderal Psychol 6(2):166-203.
3. Bay-Chen, L. Y., and A. N. Zucker. 2007. Feminism between the sheets: Sexual attitudes among feminists, nonfeminists, and egalitarians. Psychol Women Quart 31:157-163.
4. Bearman, P., J. Jones, and J. R. Udry. 2008. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research Design. Caroline Population Center 2004. Available from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design (accessed July 3 2008)
5. Berscheid, E., and K. Dion. 1971. Physical Attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. J Exp Soc Psy 7:173-189.
6. Blumberg, E. S. 2003. The lives and voices of highly sexual women. J Sex Res 40(2):146-157. (Pubitemid 36818709)
7. Bogaert, A. F., and W. A. Fisher. 1995. Predictors of university men's number of sexual partners. J Sex Res 32(2):119-130.
8. Brown, T. A., and T. F. Cash. 2001. Perceptions of physical attractiveness among college students: Selected determinants and methodological matters. J Soc Psy 126(3):305-316.
9. Buhi, E. R., P. Goodson, and T. B. Neilands. 2008. Out of Sight, Not Out of Mind: Strategies for Handling Missing Data. Am J Health Behav 32(1):83-92.
10. Burdett, K., and M. G. Coles. 1999. Long-Term partnership formation: Marriage and employment. Eco J 109(456):307-334.
11. Burdett, K., and M. G. Coles. 2001. Transplants and implants: The economics of self-improvement. Int Eco Rev 42(3):597-616.
12. Buss, D. M. 1998. Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. J Sex Res 35(1):19-31. (Pubitemid 28243978)
13. Buss, D. M., and M. Barnes. 1986. Preferences in human mate selection. J Personality Soc Psy 50(3):559-570.
14. Buss, D. M., T. K. Shackelford, L. A. Kirkpatrick, and R. J. Larsen. 2001. A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. J Marriage Fam 63(2):491-503.
15. Byers, E. SANDRA, and K. Lewis. 1988. Dating couples' disagreements over the desired level of sexual intimacy. J Sex Res 24:15-29.
16. Carr, D., and M. A. Friedman. 2005. Is obesity stigmatizing? Body weight, perceived discrimination, and psychological well-being in the United States. J Health Soc Behav 46(3):244-259. (Pubitemid 41503877)
17. Cawley, J., K. Joyner, and J. Sobal. 2006. Size matters: The influence of adolescent's weight and height on dating and sex. Rationality Soc 18(1):67-94. (Pubitemid 43812647)
18. Chantala, K. 2006. Guidelines for Analyzing Add Health Data. Carolina Population Center 2006 (accessed July 3, 2008). http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/ addhealth/files/wt-guidelines.pdf.
19. Chantala, K., and J. Tabor. 1999. National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Strategies to perform a design-based analysis using the Add Health data. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
20. Choo, E., and A. Siow. 2006. Estimating a marriage matching model with spillover effects. Demography 43(3):463-490. (Pubitemid 44467655)
21. Christensen, H. T., and G. R. Carpenter. 1962. Value-behavior discrepancies regarding premarital coitus in three Western cultures. Am Sociol Rev 27(1):66-74.
22. Cohen, L. L., and R. L. Shotland. 1996. Timing of first sexual intercourse in a relationship: Expectations, experiences, and perceptions of others. J Sex Res 33(4):291-299. (Pubitemid 26424990)
23. Cohn, L. D., and N. E. Adler. 1992. Female and Male perceptions of ideal body shapes: Distorted views among caucasian college students. Psy Women Quart 16:69-79.
24. Coles, M. G., and M. Francesconi. 2007. On the emergence of toyboys: Equilibrium matching with ageing and uncertain careers. Institute for the Study of Labor Working Paper Series Discussion Paper No. 2612.
25. Coombs, R. H., and W. F. Kenkel. 1966. Sex differences in dating aspirations and satisfaction with computer-selected partners. J Marriage Fam 28(1):62-66.
26. Crawford, M., and D. Popp. 2003. Sexual double standards: a review and methodological critique of two decades of research. J Sex Res 40(1):13-26. (Pubitemid 36514642)
27. Cross, G. 2008. Men to boys: The making of modern immaturity. New York: Columbia University Press.
28. Cunningham, M. R., A. R. Roberts, A. P. Barbee, P. B. Druen, and C.-H. Wu. 1995. "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. J Personality Soc Psy 68(2):261-279.
29. Daly, M. 1999. Darwinism and the roots of machismo. Scientific Am Presents 10(2):8-14.
30. Daly, M., and M.Wilson. (Eds.). 2005. Human behavior as animal behavior. In Behavior of animals: Mechanisms, function, and evolution, eds J. J. Bolhuis and L. A. Giraldeau. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
31. Department of Health and Human Services. 2008. Calculate your body mass index. National Institutes of Health. http://www.nhlbisupport.com/bmi/(accessed July 3, 2008).
32. DeSteno, D. A., and P. Salovey. 1996. Evolutionary origins of sex differences in jealousy? Questioning the "fitness" of the model. Psychol Sci 7(6):367-372.
33. Dietz, T., T. R. Burns, and F. H. Buttel. 1990. Evolutionary theory in sociology: An examination of current thinking. Sociol Forum 5(2):155-171.
34. Dion, K. K., and E. Berscheid. 1972. What is beautiful is good. J Personality Soc Psy 24(3):285-290.
35. Doosje, B., K. Rojahn, and A. Fischer. 1999. Partner preferences as a function of gender, age, political orientation and level of education. Sex Roles 40(1/2):45-60.
36. Eagly, A. H. 1997. Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. Am Psychologist 52(12):1380-1383.
37. Eastwick, P. W., and E. J. Finkel. 2008. Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? J Perssonality Soc Psy 94(2):245-264.
38. Elder, G. H. 1969. Appearance and education in marriage mobility. Am Sociol Rev 34(4):519-533.
39. Enders, C. K. 2001. The Performance of the Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimator in Multiple Regression Models with Missing Data. Ed Psychol Measurement 61(5):713-740.
40. Eyre, S. L., V. Hoffman, and S. G. Millstein. 1998. The gamesmanship of sex: A model based on African American adolescent accounts. Med Anthr Quart 12(4):467-489. (Pubitemid 128688824)
41. Fallon, A. E., and P. Rozin. 1985. Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. Jf Abnorm Psy 94(1):102-105. (Pubitemid 16147367)
42. Fisman, R., S. S. Iyengar, E. Kamenica, and I. Simonson. 2006. Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment. Quart J Eco 121(2):673-697. (Pubitemid 43668217)
43. Flegal, K. M., J. A. Sheperd, A. C. Looker, B. I. Graubard, L. G. Borrud, C. L. Ogden, T. B. Harris, J. E. Everhard, and N. Schenker. 2009. Comparisons of percentage body fat, body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-stature ratio in adults. Am J Clin Nut 89(2):500-508.
44. Fletcher, G. J. O., J. M. Tither, C. O'Loughlin, M. Friesen, and N. Overall. 2004. Warm and homely or cold and beautiful? Sex differences in trading off traits in mate selection. Personality Soc Psy Bull 30:659-672. (Pubitemid 38614650)
45. Furnham, A. 2009. Sex differences in mate selection preferences. Personality Ind Diff 47(4):262-267.
46. Gangestad, S.W., and J. A. Simpson. 2000. The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behav Brain Sci 23:573-644.
47. Gangestad, S. W., and R. Thornhill. 1997. The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating assymmetry. Evolution Hum Behav 18:69-88. (Pubitemid 127165576)
48. Gillen, M. M., E. S. Lefkowitz, and C. L. Shearer. 2006. Does Body image play a role in risky sexual behavior and attitudes? J Youth Ado 35(2):243-255. (Pubitemid 43839048)
49. Gillmore, M. R., M. E. Archibald, D. M. Morrison, A. Wilsdon, E. A. Wells, M. H. Hoppe, D. Nahom, and E. Murowchich. 2002. Teen sexual behavior: Applicability of the theory of reasoned action. J Marriage Fam 64(4):885-897.
50. Grodstein, F., M. B. Goldman, and D. W. Cramer. 1994. Body Mass Index and Ovulatory Infertility. Epidemiol 5(2):247-250. (Pubitemid 24073400)
51. Haavio-Mannila, E., J. P. Roos, and O. Kontula. 1996. Repression, revolution and ambivalence: The sexual life of three generations. Acta Sociologica 39(4):409-430. (Pubitemid 127017148)
52. Halpern, C. T., J. R. Udry, M. E. Campbell, and C. Suchindran. 1999. Effects of body fat on weight concerns, dating, and sexual activity: A longitudinal analysis of black and white adolescent girls. Dev Psy 35(3):721-736.
53. Hansen, S. L. 1977. Dating choices of high school students. Fam Coor 26(2):133-138.
54. Hayes, D., and C. E. Ross. 1986. Body and mind: The effect of exercise, overweight, and physical health on psychological well-being. J Health Soc Behav 27(4):387-400. (Pubitemid 17022207)
55. Howard, J. A., P. Blumstein, and P. Schwartz. 1987. Social or evolutionary theories? Some observations on preferences in human mate selection. J Personality Soc Psy 53(1):194-200.
56. Hrdy, S. Blaffer. 1981. The woman that never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Hrdy, S. Blaffer. 1999. Mother nature: Maternal instincts and how they shape the human species. New York: Ballantine Books.
58. Kaneshiro, B., J. T. Jensen, N. E. Carlson, S. M. Harvey, M. D. Nichols, and A. B. Edelman. 2008. Body mass index and sexual behavior. Obstetrics Gyn 112:586-592.
59. Kenrick, D. T., G. E. Groth, M. R. Trost, and E. K. Sadalla. 1993. Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. J Personality Soc Psy 64(6):951-969.
60. Kenrick, D. T., E. K. Sadalla, G. E. Groth, and M. R. Trost. 1990. Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. J Personality 58(1):97-116.
61. Kimmel, M. 2008. Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
62. Korn, S. J., and R. M. Lerner. 1972. The development of body-build stereotypes in males. Child Dev 43(3):908-920.
63. Kruger, D. J. 2006. Male facial masculinity influences attributions of personality and reproductive strategy. Personal Rel 13:451-463. (Pubitemid 44973283)
64. Kruger, D. J., Maryanne Fisher, and Ian Jobling. 2003. Proper and dark heroes as dads and cads. Hum Nat 14(3):305-317.
65. Langlois, J. H., L. Kalakanis, A. J. Rubenstein, A. Larson, M. Hallam, and M. Smoot. 2000. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 126(3):390-423.
66. Leit, R. A., H. G. Pope Jr., and J. J. Gray. 2001. Cultural expectations of muscularity in men: The evolution of Playgirl centerfolds. Int J Eating Dis 29:90-93.
67. Li, N. P., J. M. Bailey, D. T. Kenrick, and J. A. W. Linsenmeier. 2002. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. J Personality Soc Psy 82(6):947-955.
68. Li, N. P., and D. T. Kenrick. 2006. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. J Personality Soc Psy 90(3):468-489. (Pubitemid 43881471)
69. Luo, S., and G. Zhang. 2009. What leads to romantic attraction: Similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study. J Personality 77(4):933-963.
70. Margolin, L., L. White. 1987. The continuing role of physical attractiveness in marriage. J Marriage Fam 49(1):21-27.
71. Mathes, E. W., C. Arms, A. Bryant, J. Fields, and A. Witowski. 2005. Do men believe that physically attractive women are more healthy and capable of having children? Psychol Rep 96(3):1002-1008. (Pubitemid 41328683)
72. McNulty, J. K., L. A. Neff, and B. R. Karney. 2008. Beyond initial attraction: Physical attractiveness in newlywed marriage. J Fam Psy 22(1):135-143.
73. Meier, A. M. 2003. Adolescents' transition to first intercourse, religiosity, and attitudes about sex. Soc Forces 81(3):1031-1052. (Pubitemid 36507662)
74. Moore, F. R., and C. Cassidy. 2007. Female status predicts female mate preferences across nonindustrial societies. Cross-Cultural Res 41(1):66-74.
75. Mulford, M., J. Orbell, C. Shatto, and J. Stockard. 1998. Physical attractiveness, opportunity, and success in everyday exchange. Am J Soc 103(6):1565-1592.
76. Murstein, B. I. 1972. Physical attractiveness and marital choice. J Personality Soc Psy 22(1):8-12.
77. Muthen, B. O., D. Kaplan, and M. Hollis. 1987. On Structural Equation Modeling with Data that are Not Missing Completely at Random. Psychometrika 52:431-462.
78. Nevid, J. S. 1984. Sex differences in factors of romantic attraction. Sex Roles 11(5/6):401-411.
79. Ode, J. J., J. M. Pivarnik, M. J. Reeves, and J. L. Knous. 2007. Body mass index as a predictor of percent fat in college athletes and nonathletes. Med Sci Sports Exer 39(3):403-409. (Pubitemid 46667938)
80. O'Sullivan, L. F. 1995. Less is more: The effects of sexual experience on judgments of men's and women's personality characteristics and relationship desirability. Sex Roles 33(3/4):159-181.
81. Rich-Edwards, J. W., D. Spiegelman, M. Garland, E. Hertzmark, D. J. Hunter, G. A. Colditz, W. C. Willett, H. Wand, and J. E. Manson. 2002. Physical Activity, Body Mass Index, and Ovulatory Infertility. Epidemiol 13(2):184-190. (Pubitemid 34160493)
82. Regan, P. C. 1998. What if you can't get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24(12):1294-1303.
83. Regan, P. C., and A. Joshi. 2003. ideal partner preferences among adolescents. Soc Behav Personality 31(1):13-20. (Pubitemid 36224631)
84. Reiss, I. L. 1967. The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehard, and Winston.
85. Reiss, I. L. 1986. Journey into sexuality: An exploratory voyage. New York: Prentice Hall.
86. Schmitt, D. P. 2005a. Fundamentals of human mating strategies. In The handbook of evolutionary psychology, ed. D. M. Buss. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
87. Schmitt, D. P. 2005b. Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behav Brain Sci 28:247-31.
88. Scott Long, J., J. Freese, StataCorp LP. 2006. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
89. South, J. S. 1991. Sociodemographic differentials in mate selection preferences. J Marriage Fam 53(4):928-940.
90. Sprecher, S. 1989a. The importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning potential, and expressiveness in initial attraction. Sex Roles 21(9/10):591-607.
91. Sprecher, S. 1989b. Premarital sexual standards for different categories of individuals. J Sex Res 26(2):232-248. (Pubitemid 19121623)
92. Sprecher, S. 1998. Social exchange theories and sexuality. J Sex Res 35(1):32-43. (Pubitemid 28243979)
93. Sprecher, S., A. Barbee, and P. Schwartz. 1995. "Was it good for you, too?": Gender differences in first sexual intercourse experiences. J Sex Res 32(1):3-15. (Pubitemid 26085631)
94. Sprecher, S., K. McKinney, and T. L. Orbuch. 1987. Has the sexual double standard disappeared? An experimental test. Soc Psy Quart 50(1):24-31.
95. Sprecher, S., Q. Sullivan, and E. Hatfield. 1994. Mate Selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample. J Personality Soc Psy 66(6):1074-1080.
96. Stevens, G., D. Owens, and E. C. Schaefer. 1990. Education and attractiveness in marriage choices. Soc Psy Quart 53(1):62-70.
97. Sugiyama, L. S. 2005. Physical attractiveness in adaptationist perspective. In The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, ed. D. M. Buss. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
98. Sweeney, M. M., and M. Cancian. 2004. The changing importance of white women's economic prospects for assortative mating. J Marriage Fam 66(4):1015-1028. (Pubitemid 39567770)
99. Symons, D. 2005. Adaptationism and human mating psychology. In The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, ed. D. M. Buss. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
100. Taylor, P. A., and N. D. Glenn. 1976. The utility of education and attractiveness for females' status attainment through marriage. Am Socl Rev 41(3):484-498.
101. Townsend, J. Marshall, and G. D. Levy. 1990. Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Arch Sex Behav 19(2):149-164. (Pubitemid 20155869)
102. Udry, J. R. 1977. The Importance of being beautiful: A reexamination and racial comparison. Am J Soc 83(1):154-160.
103. Udry, J. R. 1981. Marital alternatives and marital disruption. J Marriage Fam 43(4):889-897.
104. Umberson, D., and M. Hughes. 1987. The impact of physical attractiveness on achievement and psychological well-being. Soc Psy Quart 50(3):227-236.
105. Van de Rijt, A., and M. M. Macy. 2006. Power and dependence in intimate exchange. Social Forces 84(3):1455-1470. (Pubitemid 43587735)
106. Wardle, J., J. Waller, and M. J. Jarvis. 2002. Sex differences in the association of socioeconomic status with obesity. Am J Public Health 92(8):1299-1304. (Pubitemid 34815795)
107. Wedekind, C., and S. Furi. 1997. Body odor preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proceed: Biol Sci 264(1387):1471-1479. (Pubitemid 27480703)
108. Wiederman, M. W. 1993. Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements. Ethology Sociobiol(14):331-352.
109. Wiederman, M.W., and S. R. Hurst. 1998. Body size, physical attractiveness, and body image among young adult women: Relationships to sexual experience and sexual esteem. J Sex Res 35(3):272-281. (Pubitemid 28429160)
110. Wiseman, C. V., J. J. Gray, J. E. Mosimann, and A. H. Ahrens. 1992. Cultural expectations of thinness in women: An update. Int J Eating Dis 11(1):85-89.