Partner preferences as a function of gender, age, political orientation and level of education

Sex Roles

Volumn 40, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 45-60

  Doosje, Bertjan ^b   Rojahn, Krystyna ^b   Fischer, Agneta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033483449     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1018826300179     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role theory and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51, 909-917.
2. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
3. Buss, D. M. (1994). Mate preferences in 37 cultures. In W. J. Lonner & R. S. Malpass (Eds.), Psycholog and Culture. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. F. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
5. Buss, D. M., Abbott, M, Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., Bruchon-Schweitzer, M., Ch'u, H., Czapinski, J., De Raad, B., Ekehammer, B., El Lohamy, N., Fioravanti, M., Georgeas, J., Gjerde, P., Guttman, R., Hazan, F., Iwawaki, S., Janakiramaiah, N., Khosroshani, F., Kreitler, S., Lachenicht, L., Lee, M., Liik, K., Little, B., Mika, S., Moadel-Shahid, M., Moane, G., Montero, M., Mundy-Casle, A. C., Niit, T., Nsenduluka, E., Pienkowski, R., Pirttila-Backman, A.-M., Ponce De Leon, J., Rousseau, J., Runco, M. A., Safir, M. P., Samuels, C., Sanitioso, R., Serpell, R., Smid, N., Spencer, C., Tadinac, M., Todorova, E. N., Troland, K., Van Den Brande, L., Van Heck, G., Van Langenhove, L., Yang, K.-S. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 21, 5-47.
6. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of the species by means of natural selection, or, preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: Murray.
7. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.
8. Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Feingold, A. (1992a). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125-139.
10. Feingold, A. (1992b). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304-341.
11. Howard, J. A., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1987). Social or evolutionary theories? Some observations on preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 194-200.
12. Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37, 554-558.
13. Huston, T. L., & Ashmore, R. D. (1986). Women and men in personal relationships. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The psychology of male-female relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
14. Kenrick, D. T., & Trost, M. R. (1993). The evolutionary perspective. In A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender. New York: Guilford Press.
15. Lottes, I. L., & Kuriloff, P. J. (1992). The effects of gender, race, religion, and political orientation on the sex role attitudes of college freshmen. Adolescence, 27, 675-688.
16. McGinnis, R. (1958). Campus values in mate selection: A repeat study. Social Forces, 36, 368-373.
17. Sidanius, J. (1993). The interface between racism and sexism. Journal of Psychology, 127, 311-322.
18. Spence, J., Deaux, K., & Helmreich, R. L. (1985). Sex roles in contemporary American society. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2). New York: Random House.
19. Wakil, P. (1973). Campus mate selection preferences: A cross-national comparison. Social Forces, 51, 471-476.