Sugaring o'er the devil: Moral superiority and group identification help individuals downplay the implications of ingroup rule-breaking

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 141-149

  Iyer, Aarti ^a   Jetten, Jolanda ^a   Haslam, S Alexander ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857233987     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.864     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101-110. doi: 10.1080/0305724022014322.
3. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford: Blackwell.
4. British Broadcasting Corporation (2005a). Paras charged with Iraqi murder. Retrieved from .
5. British Broadcasting Corporation (2005b). Two soldiers found guilty of Iraq abuse. Retrieved from .
6. Brooks, R. (1999). When sorry isn't enough: The controversy over apologies and reparations for human injustice. New York: New York University Press.
7. Castano, E., Paladino, M., Coull, A., & Yzerbyt, V. (2002). Protecting the ingroup stereotype: Ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 365-385.
8. Cockburn, J. (2006, May 8). Obama: As he rises, he falls. The Nation.
9. Derks, B., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2007). Social creativity strikes back: Improving motivated performance of low status group members by valuing ingroup dimensions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 470-493.
10. Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
11. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
12. Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., Barreto, M., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1397-1410.
13. Fan, Y. (2005). Ethical branding and corporate reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10, 341-350.
14. Hopman, P., & van Leeuwen, E. (2009). Who do we inform? The role of status and target in intergroup whistle-blowing. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 605-618.
15. Hornsey, M. J. (2005). Why being right is not enough: Predicting defensiveness in the face of group criticism. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 301-334.
16. Hornsey, M. J. & Jetten, J. (2003). Not being what you claim to be: Impostors as sources of group threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 639-657.
17. Jetten, J., & Hornsey, M. J. (2011). The many faces of rebels. In J. Jetten & M. J. Hornsey (Eds.), Rebels in groups: Dissent, deviance, difference, and defiance (pp.1-13). New York: Blackwell.
18. Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2005). Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9-11. Self and Identity, 4, 331-348.
19. Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (versus competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-279.
20. Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., ... Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multi-component) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165.
21. van Leeuwen, E., van den Bosch, M., Castano, E., & Hopman, P. (2010). Dealing with deviants: The effectiveness of rejection, denial, and apologies in protecting the public image of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 282-299.
22. Leidner, B., Castano, E., Zaiser, E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1115-1129.
23. nd Ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
24. Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Toboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988.
25. Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V., & Leyens, J.-P. (1988). Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
26. Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Biernat, M. (2010). Motivated shifting of justice standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 768-779.
27. Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33-43.
28. Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1-20.
29. Pope Benedict X. V. I. (2010, 19 March). Pastoral letter of the Holy Father Benedict XVI to the Catholics of Ireland. Retrieved from .
30. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
31. van Prooijen, J.-W. (2006). Retributive reactions to suspected offenders: The importance of social categorizations and guilt probability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 715-726.
32. Roccas, S., Klar, Y., & Leviatan, I. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the ingroup's moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698-711.
33. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25 (pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
34. Sherman, D. K., Kinias, Z., Major, B., Kim, H. S., & Prenovost, M. (2007). The group as a resource: Reducing biased attributions for group success and failure via group affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1100-1112.
35. rd ed.). Northridge, CA: HarperCollins.
36. Tajfel, H., & Turner J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
37. Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2007). Moral hypocrisy: Social groups and the flexibility of virtue. Psychological Science, 18, 689-690.
38. Walker, L. J., & Hennig, K. H. (2004). Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: Just, brave, and caring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 629-647.