Moral hypocrisy: Social groups and the flexibility of virtue

Psychological Science

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 689-690

  Valdesolo, Piercarlo ^a   Desteno, David ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MORALITY; PEER GROUP; PHYSIOLOGY; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ALTRUISM; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MORALS; PEER GROUP; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 34547567813     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01961.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27 46.
2. Bandura, A. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364 374.
3. Batson, C.D., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J.L., Kampf, H.C. Wilson, A.D. (1997). In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1335 1348.
4. Darley, J.M. (1992). Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 199 218.
5. DeSteno, D.A., Dasgupta, N., Bartlett, M.Y. Cajdric, A. (2004). Prejudice from thin air: The effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 15, 319 324.
6. Haidt, J. Graham, J. (in press). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research.
7. Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York : Cambridge University Press.
8. Valdesolo, P. DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 476 477.