The basic body plan of arthropods: Insights from evolutionary morphology and developmental biology

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 353-367

  Zrzavy J ^a   Stys P ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Crustacea; Hexapoda; Homology; Myriapoda; Segmentation; Tagmosis

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTIONARY MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY;

ARTHROPODA; CRUSTACEA; HEXAPODA; MANDIBULATA; MYRIAPODA;

EID: 0030616354     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s000360050029     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Akam, M. 1995. Hox genes and the evolution of diverse body plans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 349: 313-319.
2. Akam, M., M. Averof, J. Castelli-Gair, R. Dawes, F. Falciani and D. Ferrier. 1994. The evolving role of Hox genes in arthropods. Development 1994 Suppl.: 209-215.
3. Anderson, D. T. 1973. Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
4. Averof, M. and M. Akam. 1993. HOM/Hox genes of Artemia: implications for the origin of insect and crustacean body plans. Curr. Biol. 3: 73-78.
5. Averof, M. and M. Akam. 1995a. Hox genes and the diversification of insect and crustacean body plans. Nature 376: 420-423.
6. Averof, M. and M. Akam. 1995b. Insect-crustacean relationships: insights from comparative developmental and molecular studies. Phil Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 347: 293-303.
7. Boore, J. L., T. M. Collins, D. Stanton, L. L. Daehler and W. M. Brown. 1995. Deducing the pattern of arthropod phylogeny from mitochondrial DNA rearrangements. Nature 376: 163-165.
8. Brown, S. J., R. B. Hilgenfeld and R. E. Denell. 1994a. The beetle Tribolium castaneum has a fushi tarazu homolog expressed in stripes during segmentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 12922-12926.
9. Brown, S. J., N. H. Patel and R. E. Denell. 1994b. Embryonic expression of the single Tribolium engrailed homolog. Dev. Genet. 15: 7-18.
10. Castelli-Gair, J. and M. Akam. 1995. How the Hox gene Ultrabithorax specifies 2 different segments - the significance of spatial and temporal regulation within metamers. Development 121: 2973-2982.
11. Cohen, S. M. and G. Jürgens. 1991. Drosophila headlines. Trend Genet. 7: 267-272.
12. Dawes, R., I. Dawson, F. Falciani, G. Tear and M. Akam. 1994. Dax, a locust Hox gene related to fushi-tarazu but showing no pair-rule expression. Development 120: 1561-1572.
13. Dohle, W. 1964. Die Embryonalentwicklung von Glomeris marginata (Villers) im Vergleich zur Entwicklung anderer Diplopoden. Zool. Jb. Anat. 81: 241-310.
14. Dohle, W. and G. Scholtz. 1988. Clonal analysis of the crustacean segment: the discordance between genealogical and segmental borders. Development 104 Suppl.: 147-160.
15. Emerson, M. J. and F. R. Schram. 1990. The origin of crustacean biramous appendages and the evolution of Arthropoda. Science 250: 667-669.
16. Finkelstein, R. and N. Perrimon. 1991. The molecular genetics of head development in Drosophila melangoaster. Development 112: 899-912.
17. Foe, V. E. 1989. Mitotic domains reveal early commitment of cells in Drosophila embryos. Development 107: 1-22.
18. Friedrich, M. and D. Tautz. 1995. Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 376: 165-167.
19. Hertzel, G. 1984. Die Segmentation des Keimstreifens von Lithobius forficatus (L.) (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). Zool. Jb. Anat. 112: 369-386.
20. Huelsenback, J. P., J. J. Bull and C. W. Cunningham. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trend Ecol. Evol. 11: 152-158.
21. Jürgens, G. and V. Hartenstein. 1993. The terminal regions of the body pattern, pp. 687-746. In M. Bate and A. Martinez-Arias (Eds.), The Development of Drosophila melanogaster. CSHL Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
22. Kraus, O. and M. Kraus. 1994. Phylogenetic system of the Tracheata (Mandibulata): on 'Myriapoda'-Insecta interrelationships, phylogenetic age and primary ecological niches. Verh. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg (NF) 34: 5-31.
23. Kuhn, D. T., G. Turenchalk, J. A. Mack, G. Packert and T. B. Kornberg. 1995. Analysis of the genes involved in organizing the tail segments of the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Mech. Dev. 53: 3-13.
24. Kukalová-Peck, J. 1991. Fossil history and evolution of hexapod structures, pp. 141-179. In I. D. Naumann and CSIRO (Eds.), The Insects of Australia, Vol. 1. Melbourne Univ. Press, Carlton.
25. Larink, O. 1983. Embryonic and postembryonic development of Machilidae and Lepismatidae (Insecta: Archaeognatha et Zygentoma). Entomol. Gen. 8: 119-133.
26. Manak, J. R. and M. C. Scott. 1994. A class act: conservation of homeodomain protein function. Development 1994 Suppl.: 61-77.
27. Manton, S. M. 1928. On the embryology of a mysid crustacean, Hemimysis lamornae. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 216: 363-463.
28. Manton, S. M. 1977. The Arthropoda: Habits, Functional Morphology, and Evolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
29. Minelli, A. and F. R. Schram. 1994. Owen revisited: a reappraisal of morphology in evolutionary biology. Bijdr. Dierkd. 64: 65-74.
30. Mohler, J., J. W. Mahaffey, E. Deutsch and K. Vani. 1995. Control of Drosophila head segment identity by the bZIP homeotic gene cnc. Development 121: 237-247.
31. Panganiban G., A. Sebring, L. Nagy and S. Carroll. 1995. The development of crustacean limbs and the evolution of arthropods. Science 270: 1363-1366.
32. Patel, N. H. 1994. The evolution of arthropod segmentation: insights from comparisons of gene expression patterns. Development 1994 Suppl.: 201-207.
33. Patel, N. H., B. G. Condron and K. Zinn. 1994. Pair-rule expression patterns of even-skipped are found in both short- and long-germ beetles. Nature 367: 429-434.
34. Rempel, J. G. 1975. The evolution of the insect head: the endless dispute. Quaest. Entomol. 11: 7-25.
35. Sander, K. 1976. Specification of the basic body pattern in insect embryogenesis. Adv. Insect Physiol. 12: 125-238.
36. Scholtz, G. 1992. Cell lineage studies in the crayfish Cherax destructor (Crustacea, Decapoda): germ band formation, segmentation, and early neurogenesis. Roux Arch. Dev. Biol. 202: 36-48.
37. Scholtz, G. 1995a. Expression of the engrailed gene reveals nine putative segment anlagen in the embryonic pleon of the fresh water crayfish Cherax destructor (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Decapoda). Biol. Bull. 188: 157-165.
38. Scholtz, G. 1995b. Head segmentation in Crustacea: an immunocytochemical study. Zool. Anal. Complex Syst. 98: 104-114.
39. Scholtz, G., N. H. Patel and W. Dohle. 1994. Serially homologous engrailed stripes are generated via different cell lineages in the germ band of amphipod crustaceans (Malacostraca, Peracarida). Int. J. Dev. Biol. 38: 471-478.
40. Schram, F. R. .1986. Crustacea. Oxford Univ. Press, New York-Oxford.
41. Schram, F. R. and M. J. Emerson. 1991. Arthropod Pattern Theory: a new approach to arthropod phylogeny. Mem. Qld. Mus. 31: 1-18.
42. Snodgrass, R. E. 1935. Principles of Insect Morphology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York-London.
43. Snodgrass, R. E. 1951. Comparative Studies on the Head of Mandibulate Arthropods. Comstock Publ. Co., Ithaca.
44. Štys, P. and J. Zrzavý. 1994. Phylogeny and classification of extant Arthropoda: review of hypotheses and nomenclature. Eur. J. Entomol. 91: 257-275.
45. Wägele, J. W. 1993. Rejection of the 'Uniramia' hypothesis and implications of the Mandibulata concept. Zool. Jb. Syst. 120: 253-288.
46. Walossek, D. and K. J. Müller. 1994. Pentastomid parasites from the lower Paleozoic of Sweden. Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh - Earth Sci. 85: 1-37.
47. Wheeler, W. C., P. Cartwright and C. Y. Hayashi. 1993. Arthropod phylogeny: a combined approach. Cladistics 9: 1-39.
48. Wills, M. A., D. E. G. Briggs, R. A. Fortey and M. Wilkinson. 1995. The significance of fossils in understanding arthropod evolution. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 88: 203-215.
49. Zrzavý, J. and P. Štys. 1995. Evolution of metamerism in Arthropoda: developmental and morphological perspectives. Q. Rev. Biol. 70: 279-295.
50. Zrzavý, J., V. Hypša and M. Vlášková. 1997. Arthropod phylogeny: taxonomic congruence, total evidence, and conditional combination approaches to morphological and molecular data sets. In R. A. Fortey and R. H. Thomas (Eds.), Arthropod Relationships. Chapman & Hall, London, in press.