Exploring screen presentations in the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP)

International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 377-388

  Campbell, Claire ^a   Barnes Holmes, Yvonne ^b   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^b   Stewart, Ian ^c  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Implicit attitudes; Implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857167592     PISSN: 15777057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barnes-Holmes D, Barnes-Holmes Y, Power P, Hayden E, Milne R, & Stewart I (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32, 169-177.
2. Barnes-Holmes D, Murphy A, Barnes-Holmes Y, & Stewart I (2010). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): Exploring the impact of private versus public contexts and the response latency criterion on pro-White and anti-Black stereotyping among white Irish individuals. The Psychological Record, 60, 57-80.
3. Barnes-Holmes D, Murtagh L, Barnes-Holmes Y, & Stewart I (2010). Using the Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedures to measure attitudes towards meat and vegetables in vegetarians and meat-eaters. The Psychological Record, 60, 287-306.
4. Bowe CA, Miller JD, & Green L (1987). Qualities and locations of stimuli and responses affecting discrimination learning of chincillas (Chinchilla laniger) and pigeons (Columbia livia). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101, 132-138.
5. Chan G, Barnes-Holmes D, Barnes-Holmes Y, & Stewart I (2009). Implicit Attitudes to Work and Leisure Among North American and Irish Individuals: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10, 453-474.
6. Cullen C & Barnes-Holmes D (2008). Implicit pride and prejudice: A heterosexual phenomenon? In TG Morrison and MA Morrison (Eds.), Modern prejudice (pp. 195-223). New York: Nova Science.
7. Dawson DL, Barnes-Holmes D, Gresswell DM, Hart AJP, & Gore NJ (2009). Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: A First Study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 57-75.
8. Deroost N & Saetens E (2006). Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks. Experimental Psychology, 53, 16-30.
9. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, & Schwarz JLK (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
10. Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, & Banaji, MR (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
11. Jiang Y & Leung A (2004). Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Journal of Vision, 4,188.
12. McKenna IM, Barnes-Holmes D, Barnes-Holmes Y, & Stewart I (2007). Testing the Fake-ability of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): The First Study. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7, 253-268.
13. O'Toole C & Barnes-Holmes D (2009). Three chronometric indices of relational responding as predictors of performance on a brief intelligence test: The importance of relational flexibility. The Psychological Record, 59, 119-132.
14. Parris BA, Sharna D, & Weekes D (2007). An optimal viewing position effect in the Stroop task when only one letter is in the color carrier. Experimental Psychology, 54, 273-280.
15. Pothos EM (2005). Expectations about stimulus structure in implicit learning. Memory and Cognition, 33, 171-181.
16. Scanlon G (2008). The utility of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): Measuring self-esteem profiles of children with Special Educational Needs and assessing the attitudes of teachers to children with Emotional Behavioural Difficulties in mainstream education. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland Maynooth.
17. Schmidtke V & Heuer H (1997). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research, 60, 53-71.
18. Vahey N, Boles S, & Barnes-Holmes D (2010). Measuring Adolescents' Smoking-related Social Identity Preferences with the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) for the First Time: A Starting Point that Explains Later IRAP Evolutions. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 9, 317-334.