Testing the fake-ability of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): The first study

International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 253-268

  McKenna, Ian M ^a   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^a   Barnes Holmes, Yvonne ^a   Stewart, Ian ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Assessment; Faking; Implicit relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547828335     PISSN: 15777057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Barnes-Holmes D, Barnes-Holmes Y, Power P, Hayden E, Milne R, & Stewart I (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32, 169-177.
2. De Houwer J (in press). What are implicit attitudes and why are we using them? In RW Wiers & AW Stacy (Eds,), The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
3. Publishers, de Jong P (2002). Implicit self-esteem and social anxiety: Differential self-positivity effects in high and low anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 501-508.
4. de Jong P, Pasman W, Kindt M, & van den Hout MA (2001). A reaction time paradigm to assess (implicit) complaint-specific dysfunctional beliefs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 101-113.
5. Fiedler K, & Bluemke M (2005). Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Tests. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 307-316.
6. Gemar MC, Segal ZV, Segratti S, & Kennedy SJ (2001). Mood-induced changes on the Implicit Association Test in recovered depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 282-289.
7. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, & Schwartz JLK (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
8. Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, & Banaji MR (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
9. Hayes SC, Barnes-Holmes D, & Roche B (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
10. Kim D-Y (2003). Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 83-96.
11. Nosek BA, Greenwald AG, & Banaji MR (in press) The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In JA Bargh (ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behaviour. New York: Psychology Press.
12. Robinson JP (1974). Public opinion during the Watergate crisis. Communication Research, 1, 391-405.
13. Teachman BA, Gregg AP, & Woody SR (2001). Implicit associations of fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 226-235.