Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 249-268

  Chang, Charles B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857122510     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (141)

1. Association of the United States Army (2010). DLI's language guidelines. AUSA News: Special Report, August.
2. Baker W., Trofimovich P. Interaction of native and second language vowel system(s) in early and late bilinguals. Language and Speech 2005, 48(1):1-27.
3. Best C.T. The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words 1994, 167-224. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. J.C. Goodman, H.C. Nusbaum (Eds.).
4. Best C.T. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research 1995, 171-204. York Press, Baltimore, MD. W. Strange (Ed.).
5. Best C.T., Tyler M.D. Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege 2007, 13-34. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. O.-S. Bohn, M.J. Munro (Eds.).
6. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2008). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 5.0.26. 〈〉. http://www.praat.org.
7. Boretzky N. Contact-induced sound change. Diachronica 1991, 8(1):1-15.
8. Bourhis R.Y., Giles H. The language of intergroup distinctiveness. Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations 1977, 119-136. Academic Press, London, UK. H. Giles (Ed.).
9. Bullock B.E., Gerfen C. Phonological convergence in a contracting language variety. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2004, 7(2):95-104.
10. Bullock B.E., Toribio A.J. Trying to hit a moving target: On the sociophonetics of code-switching. Multidisciplinary approaches to code switching 2009, 189-206. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. L. Isurin, D. Winford, K. de Bot (Eds.).
11. Campbell L. Language contact and sound change. Current progress in historical linguistics 1976, 181-194. North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. W.M. Christie (Ed.).
12. Campbell L., Muntzel M.C. The structural consequences of language death. Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death 1989, 181-196. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. N.C. Dorian (Ed.).
13. Caramazza A., Yeni-Komshian G.H. Voice onset time in two French dialects. Journal of Phonetics 1974, 2(3):239-245.
14. Chang C.B. Convergence and divergence in language obsolescence. Current issues in unity and diversity of languages 2009, 933-952. Linguistic Society of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. M. Pak (Ed.).
15. Chang, C. B. (2010a). First language phonetic drift during second language acquisition. Ph.D. Thesis, Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
16. Chang, C.B. (2010b). The implementation of laryngeal contrast in Korean as a second language. In: Harvard studies in Korean linguistics (pp. 91-104), vol. 13.
17. Chang C.B., Yao Y., Haynes E.F., Rhodes R. Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2011, 129(6):3964-3980.
18. Chartrand T.L., Bargh J.A. The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 76(6):893-910.
19. Childers D.G. Modern spectrum analysis 1978, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
20. Cho T., Jun S.-A., Ladefoged P. Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 2002, 30(2):193-228.
21. Daly N., Warren P. Pitching it differently in New Zealand English: Speaker sex and intonation patterns. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2001, 5(1):85-96.
22. de Bot K. A bilingual processing model: Levelt's 'speaking' model adapted. Applied Linguistics 1992, 13(1):1-24.
23. de Bot K., Lowie W., Verspoor M. A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2007, 10(1):7-21.
24. de Leeuw E., Schmid M.S., Mennen I. The effects of contact on native language pronunciation in an L2 migrant setting. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2010, 13(1):33-40.
25. Escudero P. Second-language phonology: The role of perception. Phonology in context 2007, 109-134. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY. M.C. Pennington (Ed.).
26. Ferguson C.A. Toward a characterization of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics 1975, 17(1):1-14.
27. Flege J.E. The production of "new" and "similar" phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 1987, 15(1):47-65.
28. Flege J.E. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research 1995, 233-272. York Press, Baltimore, MD. W. Strange (Ed.).
29. Flege J.E. English vowel productions by Dutch talkers: More evidence for the "similar" vs "new" distinction. Second-language speech: Structure and process 1996, 11-52. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. A. James, J. Leather (Eds.).
30. Flege J.E. Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode 2002, 217-244. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Trier, Germany. P. Burmeister, T. Piske, A. Rohde (Eds.).
31. Flege J.E. Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. Laboratory phonology 2007, Vol. 9:353-382. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.
32. Flege J.E., Eefting W. Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of English. Speech Communication 1987, 6(3):185-202.
33. Flege J.E., Eefting W. Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics 1987, 15(1):67-83.
34. Forster, J. C. (2008). DMDX, version 3.2.6.3. 〈〉. http://www.u.arizona.edu/~kforster/dmdx/dmdx.htm.
35. Fought C. A majority sound change in a minority community: /u/-fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1999, 3(1):5-23.
36. Fowler C.A., Sramko V., Ostry D.J., Rowland S.A., Hallé P. Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French-English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 2008, 36(4):649-663.
37. Giles H. Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 1973, 15(2):87-105.
38. Giles H., Coupland N., Coupland J. Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics 1991, 1-68. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. H. Giles, J. Coupland, N. Coupland (Eds.).
39. Goldinger S.D. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 1998, 105(2):251-279.
40. Gregory S.W. Analysis of fundamental frequency reveals covariation in interview partners' speech. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1990, 14(4):237-251.
41. Grosjean F. The bilingual's language modes. One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing 2001, 1-22. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA. J.L. Nicol (Ed.).
42. Guion S.G. The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals: Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second languages. Phonetica 2003, 60(2):98-128.
43. Haggard M., Ambler S., Callow M. Pitch as a voicing cue. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1970, 47(2B):613-617.
44. Hagiwara R. Dialect variation and formant frequency: The American English vowels revisited. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 102(1):655-658.
45. Harada T. L2 influence on L1 speech in the production of VOT. Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences 2003, 1085-1088. Causal Productions, Barcelona, Spain. M.-J. Solé, D. Recasens, J. Romero (Eds.).
46. Harrington J., Palethorpe S., Watson C.I. Does the Queen speak the Queen's English?. Nature 2000, 408(6815):927-928.
47. Harrison P. An experiment with tone. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 1996, 8:575-593.
48. Hazan V., Messaoud-Golusi S., Rosen S., Nouwens S., Shakespeare B. Speech perception abilities of adults with dyslexia: Is there any evidence for a true deficit?. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2009, 52(6):1510-1529.
49. Helgason P., Ringen C. Voicing and aspiration in Swedish stops. Journal of Phonetics 2008, 36(4):607-628.
50. Hillenbrand J., Getty L.A., Clark M.J., Wheeler K. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 97(5):3099-3111.
51. Hinton L., Moonwomon B., Bremner S., Luthin H., van Clay M., Lerner J., et al. It's not just the valley girls: A study of California English. Proceedings of the 13th annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society: General session and parasession on grammar and cognition 1987, 117-128. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA. J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis, H. Filip (Eds.).
52. Hombert J.-M. Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone. Tone: A linguistic survey 1978, 77-111. Academic Press, New York, NY. V.A. Fromkin (Ed.).
53. Houde J.F., Jordan M.I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 1998, 279(5354):1213-1216.
54. House A.S., Fairbanks G. The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1953, 25(1):105-113.
55. Ingram J.C.L., Park S.-G. Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics 1997, 25(3):343-370.
56. Interagency Language Roundtable (2011). ILR speaking skill scale. Available at 〈〉. Last retrieved October 1, 2011. http://govtilr.org/Skills/ILRscale2.htm.
57. International Phonetic Association (1999). Handbook of the international phonetic association. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
58. Jiang H. Effect of L2 phonetic learning on the production of L1 vowels: A study of Mandarin-English bilinguals in Canada. New sounds 2010: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on the acquisition of second language speech 2010, 227-232. Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, M. Wrembel, M. Kul (Eds.).
59. Johnson K. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. Talker variability in speech processing 1997, 145-165. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. K. Johnson, J.W. Mullennix (Eds.).
60. Johnson K. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 2006, 34(4):485-499.
61. Johnson K. Quantitative methods in linguistics 2008, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
62. Jones J.A., Munhall K.G. Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 108(3):1246-1251.
63. Jones J.A., Munhall K.G. Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production. Current Biology 2005, 15(19):1768-1772.
64. Kang K.-H., Guion S.G. Phonological systems in bilinguals: Age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 119(3):1672-1683.
65. Kang K.-H., Guion S.G. Clear speech production of Korean stops: Changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 124(6):3909-3917.
66. Keating P., Linker W., Huffman M. Patterns in allophone distribution for voiced and voiceless stops. Journal of Phonetics 1983, 11(3):277-290.
67. Keating P.A. Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 1984, 60(2):286-319.
68. Khattab G. VOT production in English and Arabic bilingual and monolingual children. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 2000, 8:95-122.
69. Kim M. Correlation between VOT and F0 in the perception of Korean stops and affricates. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on spoken language processing (INTERSPEECH-2004) 2004, 49-52. International Speech Communication Association, Jeju Island, Korea.
70. Kim M., Horton W.S., Bradlow A.R. Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology 2011, 2(1):125-156.
71. Ko I. The merger of ey /e/ and ay /ε/ of Seoul Korean. Eoneo Jeongbo [Language Information] 2009, 10:73-89.
72. Labov W. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1: Internal factors 1994, Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA.
73. Labov W., Ash S., Boberg C. The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change 2006, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.
74. Ladefoged P. Vowels and consonants 2005, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA. 2nd ed.
75. Laeufer C. Towards a typology of bilingual phonological systems. Second-language speech: Structure and process 1996, 325-342. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. A. James, J. Leather (Eds.).
76. Lane H., Tranel B. The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1971, 14(4):677-709.
77. Lane H., Wozniak J., Matthies M., Svirsky M., Perkell J. Phonemic resetting versus postural adjustments in the speech of cochlear implant users: An exploration of voice-onset time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 98(6):3096-3106.
78. 0 control. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 187(4):613-621.
79. Lee B.S. Some effects of side-tone delay. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1950, 22(5):639-640.
80. Lee H.B. Korean. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1993, 23(1):28-31.
81. Lehiste I., Peterson G.E. Some basic considerations in the analysis of intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1961, 33(4):419-425.
82. Lenneberg E.H. Biological foundations of language 1967, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
83. Liljencrants J., Lindblom B. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language 1972, 48(4):839-862.
84. Linck J.A., Kroll J.F., Sunderman G. Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science 2009, 20(12):1507-1515.
85. Lindblom B. Phonetic universals in vowel systems. Experimental phonology 1986, 13-44. Academic Press, Orlando, FL. J.J. Ohala, J.J. Jaeger (Eds.).
86. Lisker L., Abramson A.S. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 1964, 20(3):384-422.
87. Lisker L., Liberman A.M., Erickson D.M., Dechovitz D., Mandler R. On pushing the voice-onset-time (VOT) boundary about. Language and Speech 1977, 20(3):209-216.
88. Lombard É. Le signe de l'élévation de la voix. Annales des Maladies de l'Oreille, du Larynx, du Nez et du Pharynx 1911, 37(2):101-119.
89. Long M.H. Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1983, 5(2):177-193.
90. Lord G. Second language acquisition and first language phonological modification. Selected proceedings of the 10th hispanic linguistics symposium 2008, 184-193. Cascadilla Proceedings Project, Somerville, MA. J.B. de Garavito, E. Valenzuela (Eds.).
91. Mack M. Phonetic transfer in a French-English bilingual child. Language attitudes and language conflict 1990, 107-124. Dümmler, Bonn, Germany. P.H. Nelde (Ed.).
92. Major R.C. Losing English as a first language. The Modern Language Journal 1992, 76(2):190-208.
93. Major R.C. L2 acquisition, L1 loss, and the critical period hypothesis. Second-language speech: Structure and process 1996, 147-159. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. A. James, J. Leather (Eds.).
94. Matthies M.L., Svirsky M., Perkell J., Lane H. Acoustic and articulatory measures of sibilant production with and without auditory feedback from a cochlear implant. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996, 39(5):936-946.
95. Mennen I. Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics 2004, 32(4):543-563.
96. Morris R.J., McCrea C.R., Herring K.D. Voice onset time differences between adult males and females: Isolated syllables. Journal of Phonetics 2008, 36(2):308-317.
97. Natale M. Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communication as a function of social desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975, 32(5):790-804.
98. National Security Agency (2011). Foreign language learning: A comparative analysis of relative difficulty. Available at 〈〉. Last retrieved October 1, 2011. http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/cryptologic_spectrum/foreign_language.pdf.
99. Nearey T.M., Rochet B.L. Effects of place of articulation and vowel context on VOT production and perception for French and English stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1994, 24(1):1-18.
100. Nielsen K. Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics 2011, 39(2):132-142.
101. Oh E. Effects of speaker gender on voice onset time in Korean stops. Journal of Phonetics 2011, 39(1):59-67.
102. Oh J., Jun S.-A., Knightly L., Au T. Holding on to childhood language memory. Cognition 2003, 86(3):B53-B64.
103. Ohala J. The phonetics of sound change. Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives 1993, 237-278. Addison Wesley Publishing, London, UK. C. Jones (Ed.).
104. Paradis M. An integrated neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism (1976-2000). LACUS Forum 2001, 27:5-15.
105. Pardo J.S. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 119(4):2382-2393.
106. Pardo J.S. Expressing oneself in conversational interaction. Expressing oneself/expressing one's self: Communication, cognition, language, and identity 2010, 183-196. Psychology Press, London, UK. E. Morsella (Ed.).
107. Penfield W., Roberts L. Speech and brain mechanisms 1959, Atheneum, New York, NY.
108. Peng S. Cross-language influence on the production of Mandarin /f/ and /x/ and Taiwanese /h/ by native speakers of Taiwanese Amoy. Phonetica 1993, 50(4):245-260.
109. Perkell J., Lane H., Svirsky M., Webster J. Speech of cochlear implant patients: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992, 91(5):2961-2978.
110. Perkell J., Matthies M., Lane H., Guenther F., Wilhelms-Tricarico R., Wozniak J., et al. Speech motor control: Acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models. Speech Communication 1997, 22(2-3):227-250.
111. Peterson G.E., Barney H.L. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1952, 24(1):175-184.
112. Pile, E. J. S., Dajani, H. R., Purcell, D. W., & Munhall, K. G. (2007). Talking under conditions of altered auditory feedback: Does adaptation of one vowel generalize to other vowels? In J. Trouvain, & W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 645-648). Pirrot, Dudweiler, Germany.
113. Quigley, S. L. (2008). Student linguists meet high standards at language institute. Available at 〈〉. Last retrieved October 1, 2011. http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=51675.
114. R Development Core Team (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
115. Roederer J.G. Introduction to the physics and psychophysics of music 1973, English Universities Press, London, UK.
116. Sancier M.L., Fowler C.A. Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics 1997, 27(4):421-436.
117. Sankoff G. Linguistic outcomes of language contact. The handbook of language variation and change 2002, 638-668. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA. J.K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.).
118. Sankoff G., Blondeau H. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 2007, 83(3):560-588.
119. Sapir E. Language: An introduction to the study of speech 1921, Harcourt, Brace and Co, New York, NY.
120. Schmid M.S. Languages at play: The relevance of L1 attrition to the study of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2010, 13(1):1-7.
121. Schmidt A.M. Cross-language consonant identification: English and Korean. Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege 2007, 185-200. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. O.-S. Bohn, M.J. Munro (Eds.).
122. Schwartz R.G. Effect of familiarity on word duration in children's speech: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1995, 38(1):76-84.
123. Scovel T. Foreign accents, language acquisition, and cerebral dominance. Language Learning 1969, 19(3-4):245-253.
124. Seliger H.W., Vago R.M. The study of first language attrition: An overview. First language attrition 1991, 3-15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. H.W. Seliger, R.M. Vago (Eds.).
125. Selishchev A.M. Des traits linguistiques communes aux langues balkaniques: Un balkanisme ancien en bulgare. Revue des Études Slaves 1925, 5:38-57.
126. Silva D.J. Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology 2006, 23(2):287-308.
127. Silva D.J. Variation in voice onset time for Korean stops: A case for recent sound change. Korean Linguistics 2006, 13:1-16.
128. Silva D.J. Out of one, many: The emergence of world Korean(s). Keynote address delivered at the 17th meeting of the international circle of Korean linguistics 2010, University of the Humanities, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
129. Simon E. Laryngeal stop systems in contact: Connecting present-day acquisition findings and historical contact hypotheses. Diachronica 2011, 28(2):225-254.
130. Simpson A.P. Phonetic differences between male and female speech. Language and Linguistics Compass 2009, 3(2):621-640.
131. Strange W., Levy E., Lehnholf R. Perceptual assimilation of French and German vowels by American English monolinguals: Acoustic similarity does not predict perceptual similarity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004, 115(5):2606.
132. Svirsky M.A., Lane H., Perkell J.S., Wozniak J. Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992, 92(3):1284-1300.
133. Thomason S.G., Kaufman T. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics 1988, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
134. Tremblay S., Shiller D.M., Ostry D.J. Somatosensory basis of speech production. Nature 2003, 423(6942):866-869.
135. Vick J.C., Lane H., Perkell J.S., Matthies M.L., Gould J., Zandipour M. Covariation of cochlear implant users' perception and production of vowel contrasts and their identification by listeners with normal hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2001, 44(6):1257-1267.
136. Whiteside S.P. Identification of a speaker's sex: A study of vowels. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1998, 86(2):579-584.
137. Whiteside S.P., Irving C.J. Speakers' sex differences in voice onset time: A study of isolated word production. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1998, 86(2):651-654.
138. Yang B. A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics 1996, 24(2):245-261.
139. Yates A.J. Delayed auditory feedback. Psychological Bulletin 1963, 60(3):213-232.
140. Yeni-Komshian G.H., Flege J.E., Liu S. Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2000, 3(2):131-149.
141. Yusa N., Nasukawa K., Koizumi M., Kim J., Kimura N., Emura K. Unexpected effects of the second language on the first. New Sounds 2010: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on the acquisition of second language speech 2010, 580-584. Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, M. Wrembel, M. Kul (Eds.).