Towards a structured approach to the definition of indicators for collaborative activities in engineering design

Journal of Engineering Design

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 195-216

  Gendron, Elise ^a   Pourroy, Franck ^b   Carron, Thibault ^a   Marty, Jean Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SAVOIE   (France)

^b VERIMAG   (France)

Author keywords

classification; collaboration indicators; engineering design; knowledge management

Indexed keywords

CO-DESIGN METHODOLOGY; COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES; COLLABORATIVE PLATFORM; ENGINEERING ACTIVITIES; ENGINEERING DESIGN; SHARING KNOWLEDGE; STRUCTURED APPROACH;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84857072720     PISSN: 09544828     EISSN: 14661837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09544828.2011.576334     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alizon, F., Shooter, S. B. and Simpson, T. W. 2010. Recommending a platform leveraging strategy based on the homogeneous or heterogeneous nature of a product line. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(1): 93-110.
2. Baldo, F., Rabelo, R. J. and Vallejos, R. V. 2007. An ontology-based approach for selecting performance indicators for partners suggestion. International Federation for Information Processing, 243: 187-196.
3. Barros, M. and Verdejo, M. 2000. Analysing student interaction processes in order to improve collaboration. The degree approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11: 221-241.
4. Beenen, G. 2004. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities, CSCW 2004, 212-221. Chicago: ACM Press.
5. Beylier, C., Pourroy, F. and Villeneuve, F. Implementation of a light knowledge sharing tool in engineering design. International conference on engineering design ICED'07. Paris, France. pp.587-588.
6. Beylier, C. 2009. A collaboration-centred approach to manage engineering knowledge: a case study of an engineering SME. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(6): 523-542.
7. Camarinha-Matos, L-M. and Abreu, A. 2007. A performance indicators for collaborative networks based on collaboration benefits. Production Planning & Control, 18(7): 592-609.
8. Carron, T., Marty, J. C. and Heraud, J. M. 2008. Teaching with game based learning management systems: exploring and observing a pedagogical dungeon. Simulation and Gaming, 39(3): 353-378.
9. Cheng, R. and Vassileva, J. 2006. Design and evaluation of an adaptive incentive mechanism for sustained educational online communities. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 16(3-4): 321-348.
10. Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W. and Beers, M. C. 1998. Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, 39(2): 43-57.
11. Devillers, R., Bédard, Y. and Jeansoulin, R. 2005. Multidimensional management of geospatial data quality information for its dynamic use within geographical information systems. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing Journal, 71(2): 205-215.
12. Dimitracopoulou, A. 2006. State of the art of interaction analysis for Metacognitive support & diagnosis. Deliverable of the EU 6th framework programme, network of excellence kaleidoscope, project 'interaction analysis - supporting participants in technology based learning activities', 2006, [online]. Available from: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190146/en/ [Accessed 14 January 2010]
13. Dimitriadis, Y. Interaction analysis for the detection and support of participatory roles in CSCL. 12th international workshop CRIWG 2006. Medinal del Campo, Spain. pp.155-162. Berlin: Springer.
14. Ellis, C. and Wainer, J. A conceptual model of groupware. Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. October1994, USA. pp.79-88.
15. Gann, D. M., Salter, A. J. and Whyte, J. K. 2003. Design quality indicator as a tool for thinking. Building Research & Information, 31(5): 318-333.
16. Gendron, E. 2009. New usages for knowledge management through collaborative platforms. ICKM 2009: 2070-3740. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ISSN
17. George, S. and Leroux, P. An approach to automatic analysis of learners' social behavior during computer-mediated synchronous conversations. Lecture notes in computer science, intelligent tutoring systems, pp.630-640. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. ISBN 3-540-43750-9, 2363
18. Girard, P. and Robin, V. 2006. Analysis of collaboration for project design management. Computers in Industry, 57(8-9): 817-826.
19. Girod, M. 1995. La mémoire organisationnelle. Revue Française de Gestion, 105: 30-42.
20. Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. Support for group awareness in real time desktop conferences. Proceedings of the second New Zealand computer science research students' conference. pp.147-167. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
21. Hendrickx, P. 2005. Development of performance indicators for the bovine clinical salmonellosis surveillance network in France. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 52(10): 465-475.
22. Jerman, P. 2004. Computer support for interaction regulation in collaborative problem solving, Thesis (PhD). University of Geneva (Switzerland)
23. Maier, A. M. 2008. Exploration of correlations between factors influencing communication in complex product development. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 16(1): 37-59.
24. Maier, A. M. 2009. Reflecting communication: a key factor for successful collaboration between embodiment design and simulation. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(3): 265-287.
25. Maquil, V. Expressive interactions - supporting collaboration in urban design. Proceedings of GROUP 2007. Sanibel Island, Florida, USA. pp.67-78.
26. May, M., George, S. and Prévôt, P. Tracking, analyzing, and visualizing learners' activities on discussion forums. IASTED international conference on web-based education. Chamonix, France. pp.649-656.
27. McGregor, S. P. 2002. Describing and supporting the distributed workspace: towards a prescriptive process for design teams Thesis (PhD). University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
28. Menzies, T. J. 2002. "Knowledge elicitation: the state of the art". In Handbook of software engineering and knowledge engineering, Edited by: Chang, S. K. Vol. 2, 607-627. Singapore: World-Scientific.
29. Mocko, G. A knowledge repository for behavioral models in engineering design. Design engineering technical conferences DETC'04. Salt Lake City, USA. ASME (Paper No. CIE2004-57746)
30. Nardo, M. 2005. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide, Italy: OECD Publishing. OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2005/3
31. O'Dell, C., Elliot, S. and Hubert, C. 2004. "Achieving knowledge management outcomes". In Handbook on knowledge management, 1, Edited by: Holsapple, C. W. 253-287. Berlin: Springer. 2nd Printing
32. Pinelle, D. and Gutwin, C. 2003. Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 10(4): 281-311.
33. Reyes, P. and Tchounikine, P. 2005. "Mining learning groups' activities in forum-type tools". In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL'2005, 509-513. Taipei, Taiwan: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
34. Szykman, S. 2000. Design repositories: next-generation engineering design databases. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 15(3): 48-55.
35. Weiseth, P. E. 2006. "The wheel of collaboration tools: a typology for analysis within a holistic framework". In CSCW'06, 239-248. New York: ACM. Banff, Canada