The wheel of collaboration tools: A typology for analysis within a holistic framework

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 239-248

  Weiseth, Per Einar ^a   Munkvold, Bjørn Erik ^b   Tvedte, Bjørn ^a   Larsen, Sjur ^c  

^a STATOIL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

^c NTNU SOCIAL RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Collaboration framework; Collaboration processes; Collaboration tools; CSCW; E collaboration; Groupware; Typology

Indexed keywords

GROUPWARE; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

COLLABORATION FRAMEWORK; COLLABORATION PROCESSES; E-COLLABORATION; WHEEL OF COLLABORATION TOOLS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 34547221539     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1180875.1180913     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Bardram, J. Designing for the Dynamics of Cooperative Work Activities. In Proceedings of CSCW 98 (Seattle, Washington, October 1998). ACM Press, New York, NY, 1998, 89-98.
2. Bernstein, A. How can cooperative work tools support dynamic group processes? Bridging the specificity frontier. In Proceedings of CSCW 2000 (Philadelphia, PA, 2000). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2000.
3. Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, G.-J., and Nunamaker, Jr., J. F. Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success wih Group Support Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (2003), 31-63.
4. Carlson, J. R. and Zmud, R. W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 2 (1999), 153-170.
5. Cohen, M.D., March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1 (1972), 1-25.
6. Collaboration Strategies. Inside Collaboration Newsletter, 4, 1 (2005). Available: http://www.collaborate.com/publication/newsletter2/nl0105. html [March 17, 2006]
7. Daft, R. L. and Lengel, R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 5 (1986), 554-571.
8. Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B., and Vandenberg, R. J. Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25, 2 (2001), 167-197.
9. DeSanctis, G. and Gallupe, R. B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 5 (1987), 589-609.
10. Dewan, P. An Integrated Approach to Designing and Evaluating Collaborative Applications and Infrastructures. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10 (2001), 75-111.
11. Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., and Rein, G. L. Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34, 1, (1991), 39-58.
12. Ellis, C. and Wainer, J. A Conceptual Model of Groupware. In Proceedings of CSCW 94 (Chapel Hill, NC, October 1994). ACM Press, New York, NY, 1994, 79-88.
13. Erickson, T. The Design and Long-Term Use of a Personal Electronic Notebook: A Reflective Analysis. In Proceedings of CHI 96 (Vancouver, BC Canada, April 1996). ACM Press, New York, NY, 1996, 11-18.
14. Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984.
15. Grudin, I Return on Investment and Organizational Adoption. In Proceedings of CSCW 2004 (Chicago, Illinois, November 2004). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2004.
16. Grudin, I and Poltrock, S. E. Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware. In M. Zelkowitz (ed.), Advances in Computers, 45 (1997), 269-320.
17. Gupta, S. and Bostrom, R. P. Knowledge management and peer-to-peer collaboration technology: Key issues and research challenges. In Proceedings of SAIS 2003 (Savannah, Georgia, March 2003), 175-185.
18. Johansen, R. (ed.) Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams. Free Press, New York, NY, 1988.
19. Kock, N. What is Å-collaboration? Editorial Essay, International Journal of e-Collaboration, 1, 1 (2005), i-vi.
20. Majchrzak A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., and Ba, S. Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team. MIS Quarterly, 24, 4 (2000), 569-600.
21. Malone, T. W. and Crowston, K. The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26, 1 (1994), 87-119.
22. March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. Organizations. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1958.
23. McGrath, J. E. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
24. McGrath, J. E. and Hollingshead, A. B. Groups Interacting with Technology. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994.
25. Mintzberg, H. Structure in Fives. Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983.
26. Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and Theoret, A. The structure of unstructured decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 2 (1976), 246-275.
27. Munkvold, B. E. Implementing Collaboration Technologies in Industry: Case Examples and Lessons Learned. Springer-Verlag, London, 2003.
28. Munkvold, B. E. and Zigurs, I. Integration of E-Collaboration Technologies: Research Opportunities and Challenges. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 1, 2 (2005), 1-24.
29. Neale, D., Carroll, J. M., and Rossen, M. B. Evaluating Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Models and Frameworks. In Proceedings of CSCW 2004 (Chicago, IL, November 2004). ACM Press, New York, 2004, 112-121.
30. Päivärinta, T. and Munkvold, B. E. Enterprise content management: An integrated perspective on information management. In Proceedings of HICSS'38 (Big Island, Hawaii, January 2005). IEEE, Washington, DC, 2005.
31. Schäl, T. and Zeller, B. Supporting Cooperative Processes with Workflow Management Technology. In Tutorial H3, ECSCW'93 (Milano, Italy, September 1993).
32. Simon, H. A. The New Science of Management Decision. Harper and Row, New York, 1960.
33. Thompson, J. D. Organizations in Action. Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 1967.
34. Wainfan, L. and Davis, P. K. Challenges in Virtual Collaboration: Videoconferencing, Audioconferencing, and Computer-Mediated Communications. Rand Corporation mongraph series, Santa Monica, CA, 2004.
35. Weiseth, P. E. Situated Coordination - Coordination of Distributed Projects. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 2000. (In Norwegian)
36. Zigurs, I. and Buckland, B. A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22, 3 (1998), 313-334.
37. Zigurs, I. and Munkvold. B. E. Collaboration Technologies, Tasks, and Contexts: Evolution and Opportunity. In Galletta, D. and Zhang, P. (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems, Vol. II, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk, NY, 2006.