What benefit sharing arrangements do people want from biobanks? A survey of public opinion in Australia

Principles and Practice in Biobank Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 17-31

  Nicol, Dianne ^a   Critchley, Christine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054751743     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2007. Margin of Sampling Error. [Online] Available at: http://www.aapor.org/marginofsamplingerror?s=margin%20of%20error [accessed 22 February 2009].
2. Anderlik, M.A. 2003. Commercial biobanks and genetic research: Ethical and legal issues. American Journal of Pharmacogenomics, 3(3), 203-215.
3. Andrews, L. and Nelkin, D. 1998. Homo economicus: Commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology. Hastings Center Report, 28, 30-39.
4. Berg, K. 2001. The ethics of benefit sharing. Clinical Genetics, 59, 240-243.
5. Bruce, D. 2006. Joondalup Family Health Study: Report on the Results from the Initial Community Survey and from the Community Workshop Deliberative Survey November/December 2005. Prepared for Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, University of Western Australia. [Online] Available at: http://www.jfhs.org.au/ [accessed 27 February 2009].
6. Campbell, A.V. 2007. The ethical challenges of genetic databases: Safeguarding altruism and trust. Kings Law Journal, 18, 227-245.
7. Capps, B., Campbell, A.V. and ter Meulen, R. 2008. Access to the UK Biobank Resource: Concepts of the Public Interest and the Public Good. Report Commissioned by the UK Biobank Ethics and Governance Council. [Online] Available at: http://www.egcukbiobank.org.uk/assets/wtx048966.pdf [accessed 27 February 2009].
8. Chadwick, R. and Berg, K. 2001. Solidarity and equity: New ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2, 318-321.
9. Chalmers, D. and Nicol, D. 2004. Commercialization of biotechnology: Public trust and research. International Journal of Biotechnology, 6, 116-133.
10. Cormick, C. 2007. What does the public really think and who do they really trust?, in Human Biotechnology and Public Trust: Trends Perceptions and Regulation, edited by M. Stranger. Hobart: Centre for Law and Genetics Occasional Paper No. 7, 115-129.
11. Critchley, C. 2008. Public opinion and trust in scientists: The role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 309-327.
12. Farquharson, K. and Critchley, C. 2004. Risk, trust and cutting-edge technologies: A study of Australian attitudes. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 2, 121-146.
13. Fleming, J. 2007. Issues with tissues: Perspectives of tissue bank donors and the public towards biobanks and related genetic research, in Human Biotechnology and Public Trust: Trends Perceptions and Regulation, edited by M. Stranger. Hobart: Centre for Law and Genetics Occasional Paper No. 7, 184-201.
14. Gold, E.R. and Caulfield, T.A. 2003. Human Genetic Inventions, Patenting and Human Rights. [Online] Available at: http://www.cipp.mcgill.ca/en/publications/author/?q=E.+Richard+Gold [accessed 27 February 2009].
15. Haddow, G., Cunningham-Burley, S., Bruce, A. and Parry, S. 2008. Generation Scotland: Consulting publics and specialists at an early stage in a genetic database's development. Critical Public Health, 18, 139-149.
16. Irish Council for Bioethics. 2005. Human Biological Material: Recommendations for Collection, Use and Storage in Research. [Online] Available at: http://www.bioethics.ie/index.php/human-biological-material-for-research [accessed 27 February 2009].
17. Kaye, J. and Martin, P. 2000. Safeguards for research using large scale DNA collections. British Medical Journal, 321, 1146-1149.
18. Knoppers, B. and Sheremata, L. 2003. Beyond the rhetoric: Population genetics and benefit-sharing. Health Law Journal, 11, 89-117.
19. Laurie, G. and Hunter, K. 2004. Benefit-sharing and public trust in genetic research, in Blood & Data: Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Human Genetic Databases, edited by G. Árnason, S. Nordal and V. Árnason. Reykjavik: University of Iceland Press and Centre for Ethics, 323-331.
20. Longstaff, H. and Burgess, M. 2008. Recruiting for representation in public deliberations on the ethics of biobanks. Health Law Review, 16, 12-15.
21. Merz, J.F. 2003. On the intersection of privacy, consent, commerce and genetic research, in Populations and Genetics: Legal and Socio-Ethical Perspectives, edited by B.M. Knoppers. Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV, 257-268.
22. Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Health and Community Services. 2003. Policy Implications of Commercial Genetic Research in Newfoundland and Labrador. [Online] Available at: www.nlcahr.mun.ca/research/reports_search/DP_Final__Report.pdf [accessed 22 February 2009].
23. NHMRC. 2008. Development of an NHMRC information paper on biobanks and tissue banks, in NHMRC Tracker April 22, 2008. [Online] Available at: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/media/tracker/tracker08/080422.htm [accessed 28 February 2009].
24. Nicol, D. 2006. Public trust, intellectual property and human genetic databanks: The need to take benefit sharing seriously. Journal of International Biotechnology Law, 3, 89-103.
25. People Science & Policy Ltd. 2002. A Question of Trust: A Consultation Exploring and Addressing Questions of Public Trust. Report prepared for the Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust. [Online] Available at: www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/docs/people-science-policy.pdf [accessed 27 February 2009].
26. Stranger, M., Chalmers, D. and Nicol, D. 2005. Capital, trust and consultation: Databanks and regulation in Australia. Critical Public Health, 15, 349-358.
27. UK Parliament. 2000. Third Report: Science and Society: Summary. [Online: House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology] Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3802.htm [accessed 27 February 2009].
28. Webster, A., Brown, B., Douglas, C., Lewis, G., Kaye, J., Tutton, R. and Williams, N. 2008. Public Attitudes to Third Party Access and Benefit Sharing: Their Application to UK Biobank. Final report to the UK Biobank Ethics and Governance Council. [Online: York, Science and Technology Studies, University of York] Available at: http://www.egcukbiobank.org.uk/meetingsandreports/index.html [accessed 27 February 2009].
29. Weijer, C. Benefit-sharing and other protections for communities in genetic research. Clinical Genetics, 58, 367-368.
30. Williams, C. 2005. Australian attitudes to DNA sample banks and genetic screening. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 21, 1773-1775.