Microfluidic NF/RO separation: Cell design, performance and application

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 396, Issue , 2012, Pages 67-73

  Kaufman, Yair ^a   Kasher, Roni ^a   Lammertink, Rob G H ^b   Freger, Viatcheslav ^c  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

CFD; Concentration polarization; L v que correlation; Microfluidic; NF; Peptide concentration; RO

Indexed keywords

CELL DESIGN; CELL WALLS; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; CRITICAL DESIGN; FEED CHANNEL; LOW-PRESSURE OPERATIONS; MEMBRANE SEPARATION; MICRO CELL; MICROFLUIDIC CELL; MICROFLUIDIC TECHNOLOGIES; MODEL PEPTIDES; NF; OPTIMAL CHANNELS; PRESSURE LOSS; RO; RO MEMBRANE; STEADY EXPANSION;

ADSORPTION; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CYTOLOGY; DIALYSIS; PEPTIDES; POLARIZATION;

MICROFLUIDICS;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CELL WALL; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; MICROFILTRATION; MICROFLUIDICS; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 84857061906     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.052     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Whitesides G.M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature (London) 2006, 442:368.
2. Demello A.J. Control and detection of chemical reactions in microfluidic systems. Nature 2006, 442:394.
3. Xiang Y., Lu Y. Using personal glucose meters and functional DNA sensors to quantify a variety of analytical targets. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3:697.
4. Wörz O., Jäckel K., Richter T., Wolf A. Microreactors, a new efficient tool for optimum reactor design. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56:1029.
5. Doku G.N., Verboom W., Reinhoudt D.N., van den Berg A. On-microchip multiphase chemistry - a review of microreactor design principles and reagent contacting modes. Tetrahedron 2005, 61:2733.
6. Boehm D.A., Gottlieb P.A., Hua S.Z. On-chip microfluidic biosensor for bacterial detection and identification. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2007, 126:508.
7. Dendukuri D., Tsoi K., Hatton T.A., Doyle P.S. Controlled synthesis of nonspherical microparticles using microfluidics. Langmuir 2005, 21:2113.
8. Vorm O., Roepstorff P., Mann M. Improved resolution and very high sensitivity in MALDI TOF of matrix surfaces made by fast evaporation. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66:3281.
9. Wainright A., Williams S.J., Ciambrone G., Xue Q., Wei J., Harris D. Sample pre-concentration by isotachophoresis in microfluidic devices. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 979:69.
10. de Jong J., Lammertink R., Wessling M. Membranes and microfluidics: a review. Lab Chip 2006, 6:1125.
11. Jiang Y., Wang P.C., Locascio L.E., Lee C.S. Integrated plastic microfluidic devices with ESI-MS for drug screening and residue analysis. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73:2048.
12. Ikuta K., Maruo S., Fujisawa T., Yamada A. Micro Concentrator with Opto-Sense Micro Reactor for Biochemical IC Chip Family. 3D Composite Structure and Experimental Verification 1999, p. 376.
13. Ngene I.S., Lammertink R.G.H., Wessling M., van der Meer W. A microfluidic membrane chip for in situ fouling characterization. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 346:202.
14. Rundel J.T., Paul B.K., Remcho V.T. Organic solvent nanofiltration for microfluidic purification of poly (amidoamine) dendrimers. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1162:167.
15. Kolfschoten R.C., Janssen A.E.M., Boom R.M. Mass diffusion-based separation of sugars in a microfluidic contactor with nanofiltration membranes. J. Sep. Sci. 2011, 34:1338.
16. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 1996, Springer.
17. Lide D. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 2009, (Internet Version).
18. Bellona C., Drewes J.E., Oilker G., Luna J., Filteau G., Amy G. Comparing nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for drinking water augmentation. J. Am. Water Work. Assoc. 2008, 100:102.
19. Kasher R., Gayer B., Kulik T., Somjen D., Venkatesh N., Fridkin M., et al. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of peptides with estrogen-like activity. Biopolym. Pept. Sci. 2004, 76:404.
20. Belfer S., Gilron J., Daltrophe N., Oren Y. Comparative study of biofouling of NF modified membrane at SHAFDAN. Desalination 2005, 184:13.
21. Manttari M., Pihlajamaki A., Nystrom M. Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280:311.
22. Bason S., Kaufman Y., Freger V. Analysis of ion transport in nanofiltration using phenomenological coefficients and structural characteristics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114:3510.
23. Kedem O., Katchalsky A. A physical interpretation of the phenomenological coefficients of membrane permeability. J. Gen. Physiol. 1961, 45:143.
24. Williams M., Hestekin J., Smothers C., Bhattacharyya D. Separation of organic pollutants by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes: mathematical models and experimental verification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38:3683.
25. McCabe S., Smith J., Harriott Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering 1993, McGrawhill International Editions.
26. Liu J., Pan T., Woolley A.T., Lee M.L. Surface-modified poly (methyl methacrylate) capillary electrophoresis microchips for protein and peptide analysis. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:6948.
27. Hu S., Ren X., Bachman M., Sims C.E., Li G., Allbritton N. Cross-linked coatings for electrophoretic separations in poly (dimethylsiloxane) microchannels. Electrophoresis 2003, 24:3679.