Realized Publicness at Public and Private Research Universities

Public Administration Review

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 272-284

  Feeney, Mary K ^a   Welch, Eric W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857003546     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02521.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). 2009 Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 6th ed. [accessed December 6, 2011].
2. Blau, Peter M., and W. Richard Scott 1962. Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach. San Francisco: Chandler.
3. Blumenthal, David., Nancyanne Causino, Eric Campbell, and Karen Seashore Louis 1996. Relationships between Academic Institutions and Industry in the Life Sciences-An Industry Survey. New England Journal of Medicine 334: 368-74.
4. Bozeman, Barry. 1987. All Organizations Are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bozeman, Barry. 2000. Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory. Research Policy 29(4-5): 627-55.
6. Bozeman, Barry, and P. Craig Boardman 2003. Managing the New Multipurpose, Multidiscipline University Research Center: Institutional Innovation in the Academic Community. Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
7. Bozeman, Barry, and Stuart Bretschneider 1994. The "Publicness Puzzle" in Organization Theory: A Test of Alternative Explanations of Differences between Public and Private Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 4(2): 197-223.
8. Bozeman, Barry, and Elizabeth A. Corley 2004. Scientists' Collaboration Strategies: Implications for Scientific and Technical Human Capital. Research Policy 33(4): 599-616.
9. Bozeman, Barry, and Gordon Kingsley 1998. Risk Culture in Public and Private Organizations. Public Administration Review 58(2): 109-18.
10. Bozeman, Barry, Pamela N. Reed, and Patrick Scott 1992. Red Tape and Task Delays in Public and Private Organizations. Administration & Society 24(3): 290-322.
11. Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Conley, Aaron, and Eugene R. Tempel 2006. Philanthropy. In Privatization and Public Universities, edited by Douglas M. Priest and Edward P. St. John, 151-73.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13. Corley, Elizabeth, and Monica Gaughan 2005. Scientists' Participation in University Research Centers: What Are the Gender Differences? Journal of Technology Transfer 30(4): 371-81.
14. Dahl, Robert A., and Charles E. Lindblom 1953. Politics, Economics, and Welfare: Planning and Politico-Economic Systems Resolved into Basic Social Processes. New York: Harper.
15. de Groot, Hans, Walter W. McMahon, and J. Fredericks Volkwein 1991. The Cost Structure of American Research Universities. Review of Economics and Statistics 73(3): 424-31.
16. Del Rey, Elena. 2001. Teaching versus Research: A Model of State University Competition. Journal of Urban Economics 49(2): 356-73.
17. Duderstadt, James J., and Farris W. Womack 2003. Beyond the Crossroads: The Future of the Public University in American. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Fain, Paul. 2009. At Public Universities: Less Is More. New York Times, November 1.
19. Fairweather, James S. 1988. Entrepreneurship and Higher Education: Lessons for Colleges, Universities, and Industry. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
20. Geiger, Roger L. 1985. The Private Alternative in Higher Education. European Journal of Education 20(4): 385-97.
21. Goldstein, Susan Meyer, and Michael Naor 2005. Linking Publicness to Operations Management Practices: A Study of Quality Management Practices in Hospitals. Journal of Operations Management 23(2): 209-28.
22. Granovetter, Mark. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360-80.
23. Heinrich, Carolyn J., and Elizabeth Fournier 2004. Dimensions of Publicness and Performance in Substance Abuse Treatment Organizations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(2): 49-70.
24. Huang, Wan-Ling, Mary K. Feeney, and Eric W. Welch 2011. Organizational and Individual Determinants of Patent Production of Academic Scientists and Engineers in the United States. Science and Public Policy 38(6): 463-79.
25. Kettl, Donald F. 1993. Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26. Knott, Jack H., and A. Abigail Payne 2004. The Impact of State Governance Structures on Management and Performance of Public Organizations: A Study of Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(1): 13-30.
27. Krimsky, Sheldon, James G. Ennis, and Robert Weissman 1991. Academic Corporate Ties in Biotechnology: A Quantitative Study. Science, Technology, and Human Values 16(3): 275-87.
28. Levin, Sharon G., and Paula E. Stephan 1991. Research Productivity Over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists. American Economic Review 81(1): 114-32.
29. Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and Markets: The World's Political Economic System. New York: Basic Books.
30. Lynn, Laurence E., Jr., Carolyn J. Heinrich, and Carolyn J. Hill 2001. Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
31. Moulton, Stephanie. 2009. Putting Together the Publicness Puzzle: A Framework for Realized Publicness. Public Administration Review 69(5): 889-900.
32. Moulton, Stephanie, and Mary K. Feeney 2011. Public Service in the Private Sector: Private Loan Originator Participation in a Public Mortgage Program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(3): 547-72.
33. Owen-Smith, Jason, and Walter W. Powell 2003. The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences: Assessing the Importance of Experience and Connectivity. Research Policy 32(9): 1695-1711.
34. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Nancy Langton 1993. The Effect of Wage Dispersion on Satisfaction, Productivity, and Working Collaboratively: Evidence from College and University Faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly 38(3): 382-407.
35. Powell, Walter W. 1990. Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. In Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 12, edited by Barry M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, 295-336.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
36. Priest, Douglas M., and Edward P. St. John, eds. 2006. Privatization and Public Universities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
37. Scott, Richard W. 2001. Institutions and Organizations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38. Scott, Richard W. 2003. Institutional Carriers: Reviewing Modes of Transporting Ideas over Time and Space and Considering Their Consequences. Industrial and Corporate Change 12(4): 879-94.
39. Slaughter, Sheila. 1998. Ashe Presidential Speech: Federal Policy and Supply-Side Institutional Resource Allocation at Public Research Universities. Review of Higher Education 21(3): 209-44.
40. Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry L. Leslie 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41. Tornquist, Kristi M., and Lincoln A. Kallsen 1994. Out of the Ivory Tower: Characteristics of Institutions Meeting the Research Needs of Industry. Journal of Higher Education 56(5): 523-39.
42. Turk-Bicakci, Lori, and Steven Brint 2005. University-Industry Collaboration: Patterns of Growth for Low- and Middle-Level Performers. Higher Education 49(1-2): 61-89.
43. Wamsley, Gary L., and Mayer N. Zald 1973. The Political Economy of Public Organizations: A Critique and Approach to the Study of Public Administration. Lexington, MA: Heath.
44. Weisbrod, Burton A. 1975. Toward a Theory of the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector in a Three-Sector Economy. In Altruism, Morality, and Economic Theory, edited by Edmund S. Phelps, 171-95.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.