Gender, icts, and productivity in low-income countries: Panel study

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 30-63

  Miller, B Paige ^a   Duque, Ricardo ^b   Shrum, Wesley ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

development; gender; productivity; science; technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856986833     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243910392800     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Allison Paul DFixed effects regression models for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc; 2005:.
2. Allison Paul D.,Long J. Scott.Departmental effects on scientific productivity.American Sociological Review. 1990;55:469-78.
3. Allison Paul D.,Long J. Scott,Krauze Tad K.Cumulative advantage and inequality in science.American Sociological Review. 1982;47:615-25.
4. Anderson MeredithInformation Society and Development: The Kerala Experience. Palackal A.Shrum Wesley, ed. New Delhi: Rawat Publications; 2007:173-99.
5. Anderson Meredith,Shrum Wesley.Circumvention and social change: ICTs and the discourse of empowerment.Women's Studies in Communication. 2007;30:229-53.
6. Arunachalam Subbiah.Information for research in developing countries: Information technology, a friend or foe?.International Information and Library Review. 2003;35:133-47.
7. Astin Helen,Milem JeffreyAcademic couples: Problems and promises. Ferber M.A.Loeb J.W., ed. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press; 1997:128-55.
8. Barber Leslie A.U.S. women in science and engineering, 1960-1990: Progress toward equity?.The Journal of Higher Education. 1995;66:213-34.
9. BarjakFranz. 2004. On the integration of the internet into informal science communication. Solothurn University of Applied Sciences, Series A: Discussion Paper 2004-W02.
10. Barjak Franz.Research productivity in the internet era.Scientometrics. 2006;68:343-60.
11. Beintema Nienke M.,Di Marcantonio FedericaWomen's participation in agricultural research and higher education: Key trends in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC. IFPRI and Nairobi: G&D Program; 2009:.
12. Burrelli JoanThirty-three years of women in S&E faculty positions. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences; 2008:.
13. Campion Patricia,Shrum Wesley.Gender and science in development: Women scientists in Africa and India.Science Technology and Human Values. 2004;29:459-85.
14. Chakravarthy R.Productivity of Indian women scientists.Productivity. 1986;3:259-69.
15. Clewell Beatriz Chu,Campbell Patricia B.Taking stock: Where we've been, where we are, where we're going.Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 2002;8:255-84.
16. Cole Jonathan R.,Zuckerman HarrietAdvances in motivation and achievement. Maehr P.SteinKamp M.W., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI; 1984:217-58.
17. Cole Jonathan R.,Zuckerman Harriet.Marriage, motherhood, and research performance in science.Scientific American. 1987;256:119-25.
18. Costa Sely M.S.,Meadows Jack.The impact of computer usage on scholarly communication among social scientists.Journal of Information Science. 2000;26:255-62.
19. Crenshaw Edward.Foreign investment as a dependent variable: Determinants of foreign investment and capital penetration in developing nations.Social Forces. 1991;69:1169-82.
20. Drori Gili S.,Meyer John W.,Ramirez Francisco O.,Schofer EvanScience in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2003:.
21. Ehikhamenor Fabian A.Internet resources and productivity in scientific research in Nigerian Universities.Journal of Information Science. 2002;29:107-16.
22. Eshiwani George SHigher education in the twenty-first century: Global challenge and national response. Altbach Philip G.Peterson Patti McGill, ed. Annapolis Junction, MD: IIE Books; 1999:31-39.
23. Finkel Steven ECausal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995:.
24. Fox Mary FrankThe outer circle: Women in the scientific community. Zuckerman H.Cole J.R.Bruer J.T., ed. New York: Norton; 1991:188-204.
25. Fox Mary FrankThe handbook of science and technology studies. Sheila Jasanoff G.M.Peterson JamesPitch Trevor, ed. Newbury Park: Sage; 1995:205-23.
26. Fox Mary FrankThe equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. Davis C.S.Ginorio A.B.Hollenshead C.S.Lazarus B.B.Rayman P.M., ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996:265-69.
27. Fox Mary FrankHandbook of sociology of gender. Chafetz J.S., ed. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999:441-57.
28. Fox Mary Frank.Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists.Social Studies of Science. 2005;35:131-50.
29. Fox Mary Frank.Women and men faculty in academic science and engineering: Social organizational indicators and implications.American Behavioral Scientist. 2010;53:997-1012.
30. Fox Mary Frank,Mohapatra Sushanta.Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral granting departments.The Journal of Higher Education. 2007;78:542-71.
31. Franke Richard W.,Chasin Barbara HKerala: Radical reform as development in an Indian state. Oakland, CA: Food First; 1994:.
32. Gupta Namrata,Sharma Arun K.Women academic scientists in India.Social Studies of Science. 2002;32:901-15.
33. Gupta Namrata,Sharma Arun K.Gender inequality in the work environment at institutes of higher learning in science and technology in India.Work Employment and Society. 2003;17:597-616.
34. Holland Dana G.Between the practical and the academic: The relation of mode 1 and mode 2 knowledge production in a developing country.Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2009;34:551-72.
35. James Jeffrey,Versteeg Mila.Mobile phones in Africa: How much do we really know?.Social Indicators Research. 2007;84:117-26.
36. Johnson David R.Alternative methods for the quantitative analysis of panel data in family research: Pooled time-series models.Journal of Marriage and theFamily. 1995;57:1065-77.
37. Koku Emmanuel,Nazer Nancy,Wellman Barry.Netting scholars: Online and offline.American Behavioral Scientist. 2001;44:1750-72.
38. Kumar Neelam.Gender and stratification in science: An empirical study in the Indian setting.Indian Journal of Gender Studies. 2001;8:51-67.
39. Kyvik Svein,Teigen Mari.Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity.Science, Technology, & Human Values. 1996;21:54-71.
40. Leahey Erin.Gender differences in productivity: Research specialization as a missing link.Gender and Society. 2006;20:754-80.
41. Long J. Scott.Productivity and academic position in the scientific career.American Sociological Review. 1978;43:889-908.
42. Long J. Scott.The origins of sex differences in science.Social Forces. 1990;68:1297-316.
43. Long J. Scott.Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity.Social Forces. 1992;71:159-78.
44. Long J. Scott,Fox Mary Frank.Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism.Annual Review of Sociology. 1995;21:45-71.
45. Lyson Thomas A.,Torres Robert J.,Welsh Rick.Scale of agricultural production, civic engagement, and community welfare.Social Forces. 2001;80:311-27.
46. Mahlck Paula.Mapping gender differences in scientific careers in social and bibliometric space.Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2001;26:167-90.
47. Matzat Uwe.Academic communication and internet discussion groups: Transfer of information or creation of social contacts?.Social Networks. 2004;26:221-55.
48. Miller B. Paige,Sooryamoorthy R.,Anderson Meredith,Palackal Antony,Shrum Wesley.Gender and science in developing areas: Has the internet reduced inequality.Social Science Quarterly. 2006;87:679-89.
49. Najman Jake M.,Hewitt Belinda.The validity of publication and citation counts for sociology and other selected disciplines.Journal of Sociology. 2003;39:62-81.
50. Nakhaie M. Reza.Gender differences in publication among university professors in Canada.Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. 2002;39:151-80.
51. Nentwich Michael.Cyberscience: Modelling ICT-induced changes of the scholarly communication system.Information, Communication and Society. 2005;8:542.
52. Palackal Antony,Anderson Meredith,Paige Miller B.,Shrum WesleyNew infrastructures of knowledge production: Understanding E-science. Hine Chrstine M., ed. London: Idea Group Publishing; 2006:246-69.
53. Reskin Barbara F.Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science.American Sociological Review. 1977;42:491-504.
54. Sawyerr Akilagpa.Challenges facing African universities: Selected issues.African Studies Review. 2004;47:1-59.
55. Scholte Jan AartGlobalization: A critical introduction. New York: St. Martin's Press; 2000:.
56. Shrum Wesley.View from afar: 'Visible' productivity of scientists in the developing world.Scientometrics. 1997;40:215-235.
57. Shrum Wesley.Reagency of the internet, or, "How I Became a Guest for Science.".Social Studies of Science. 2005;35 (5): 723-754.
58. Shrum Wesley,Ramanathaiyer SundarKerala: The development experience. Reflections on sustainability and replicability. Parayil G., ed. London: Zed Books; 2000:157-77.
59. ShuklaShubhlakshmi. 2010. Publication of research work mandatory for promotion of teachers. Indian Express. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/publicationofresearchworkmandatoryforp/596300/ (accessed August 9, 2010).
60. Sonnert Gerhard,Fox Mary Frank,Adkins Kristen.Undergraduate women in science and engineering: Effects of faculty, fields, and institutions over time.Social Science Quarterly. 2007;88:1333-56.
61. Stads Gert-Jan,Beintema Nienke MWomen scientists in Sub-Saharan agricultural R&D. Agricultural science and technology indicators. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute and Inter-American Development Bank; 2006:.
62. Subrahmanyan LWomen scientists in the third world: The Indian experience. New Delhi: Sage; 1998:.
63. Science and technology for development: The new paradigm of ICT. New York: United Nations Publications; 2007:.
64. Vasileiadou Eleftheria,Vliegenthart Rens.Research productivity in the era of the internet revisited.Research Policy. 2009;38:1260-68.
65. Walsh John P.,Kucker Stephanie,Maloney Nancy G.,Gabbay Shaul.Connecting minds: Computer mediated communication and scientific work.Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 2000;51:1295-305.
66. Wellman Barry,Koku Emmanuel,Hunsinger Jeremy.Networked scholarship.The International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments. 2006;Part IV:1429-47.
67. Xie Yu,Shauman Kimberlee.Sex difference in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle.American Sociological Review. 1998;63:847-70.
68. Xie Yu,Shauman KimberleeWomen in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2003:.
69. Ynalvez Marcus,Duque Ricardo B.,Mbatia Paul,Sooryamoorthy R.,Palackal Antony,Shrum Wesley.When do scientists adopt the internet? Dimensions of connectivity in developing areas.Scientometrics. 2005;63:39-67.
70. Zimmerman Eric,Bar-Ilan Judit.PIM @ academia: How e-mail is used by scholars.Online Information Review. 2008;33:22-42.
71. Zuckerman Harriet,Cole Jonathan R.Women in American science.Minerva. 1975;13:82-102.