Gender and Stratification in Science: An Empirical Study in the Indian Setting

Indian Journal of Gender Studies

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 51-67

  Kumar, Neelam ^a  

^a INDIAN NATIONAL SCIENCE ACADEMY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997907186     PISSN: 09715215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/097152150100800103     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Acker, S. 1992. ‘New Perspectives on an Old Problem: The Position of Women Academics in British Higher Education’, Higher Education, 24 (1): 57-75.
2. Ahmad, K. 1979. ‘Studies of Educated Working Women in India: Trends and Issues’, Economic and Political Weekly, 14 (33): 1435-40.
3. Barinaga, M. 1994. ‘Surprises Across the Cultural Divide’, Science, 263 (5152): 1468-72.
4. Basu, A. 1997. ‘Contemporary Indian Women in Science: A Scientometric Study’. Unpublished paper, NISTADS, New Delhi.
5. Bayer, A. and H. Astin. 1975. ‘Sex Differentials in the Academic Award System’, Science, 188 (4190): 796-802.
6. Blackburn, R.T., C.D. Behymer and D.E. Hall. 1978. ‘Research Note: Correlates of Faculty Publications’, Sociology of Education, 51 (2): 132-41.
7. Chafetz, J.A. 1997. ‘Feminist Theory and Sociology: Underutilized Contributions for Mainstream Theory’, Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 97-120.
8. Chakravarthy, R. 1986. ‘Productivity of Indian Women Scientists’, Productivity, 27 (October-December): 259-69.
9. Charles, M. 1992. ‘Cross-national Variation in Occupational Sex Segregation ’, American Sociological Review, 57 (4): 483-502.
10. Cole, J.R. 1979. Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: Free Press.
11. Cole, J.R. 1987. ‘Women in Science’, in D.N. Jackson and J.P. Rushton (eds.), Origins and Assessment, pp. 359-75. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Cole, J.R. 1989. ‘The Paradox of Individual Particularism and Institutional Universalism’, Social Science Information, 28 (1): 51-76.
13. Cole, J.R. and S. Cole. 1973. Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14. Cole, J.R. and H. Zuckerman. 1987. ‘Marriage, Motherhood and Research Performance in Science’, Scientific American, 256 (2): 83-89.
15. Eagly, A.H. 1983. ‘Gender and Social Influence: A Social Psychological Analysis’, American Psychologist, 38 (9): 971-81.
16. Feist, G.J. and M.E. Gorman. 1998. ‘The Psychology of Science: Review and Integration of a Nascent Discipline’, Review of General Psychology, 2 (1): 3-47.
17. Fox, M.F. 1995. ‘Women and Scientific Careers’, in Sheila Jasonoff et al. (eds.), Handbook of Sociology of Science, pp. 205-23. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Garrison H.H., S.S. Herman and J.A. Lipton. 1992. ‘Measuring Characteristics of Scientific Research: A Comparison of Bibliographic and Survey Data’, Scientometrics, 24 (2): 359-70.
19. Godlee, F. 1997. ‘Glass Ceiling Confirmed in Biomedical Research ’, British Medical Journal, 314 (31): 1570.
20. Gould, P. 1997. ‘Women and the Culture of University Physics in Late Nineteenth-Century Cambridge’, British Journal of History of Science, 30 (105): 127-50.
21. Holloway, M. 1993. ‘A Lab of Her Own’, Scientific American, 269 (5): 94-103.
22. Knorr, R.D., R. Mittermeir, Aicholzer and G. Waller. 1979. ‘Individual Publication Productivity as a Social Position Effect in Academic and Industrial Research Units’, in F.M. Andrews (ed.), Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries. Cambridge: UNESCO and Cambridge University Press.
23. Koblitz, A.H. 1996. ‘Challenges in Interpreting Data’, World Science Report, pp. 327-28. Paris: UNESCO.
24. Kohlstedt S.G. and H. Longino. 1997. ‘What do Research on Women in Science Have to Do with Each Other?’, Osiris, 2nd series, 12: 3-15.
25. Krishnaraj, M. 1978. ‘Working Women Science-degree Holders in Bombay, 1976-1978’. Research Unit on Women Studies, SNDT Women's University, Mumbai.
26. Kyvik, S. 1990. Motherhood and Scientific Productivity, Social Studies of Science, 20 (1): 149-60.
27. Leon, E. and L. Velho. 1997. ‘Gender and Scientific Production’. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, Israel.
28. Long, J.S. 1992. ‘Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity ’, Social Forces, 70 (1): 159-78.
29. Long J.S., P.D. Allison and McGinnis. 1993. ‘Rank Advancement in Academic Careers: Sex Differences and the Effects of Productivity’, American Sociological Review, 58 (5): 703-22.
30. Long, J.S. and M.F. Fox. 1995. ‘Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism’, Annual Review of Sociology, 21: 45-71.
31. McGregor, E. and Sandra Harding. 1996. ‘Science by Whom?’, World Science Report, pp. 305-19. Paris: UNESCO.
32. Poole, M., L. Bomholt and F. Summers. 1997. ‘An International Study of the Gendered Nature of Academic Work: Some Cross-cultural Explorations’, Higher Education, 34 (3): 373-96.
33. Prasad, N. 1997. ‘Organizational Cultures and Research Performance of Scientists in Academic and National Laboratory Settings in India’. Ph.D. thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
34. Ramasubban, R. 1977. ‘Towards a Relevant Sociology of Science for India’, in Stuart S. Blume (ed.), Perspectives in the Sociology of Science, pp. 155-93. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
35. Ramasubban, R. 1996. ‘Women in Science: The Case of India’, in World Science Report, pp. 334-35. Paris: UNESCO.
36. Reskin, B. 1978. ‘Scientific Productivity, Sex and Location in the Institution of Science’, American Journal of Sociology, 83 (5): 1235-43.
37. Romanin, S. and Ray Over. 1993. ‘Australian Academics: Career Patterns, Work Roles, and Family Life-cycle Commitments of Men and Women’, Higher Education, 26 (4): 411-29.
38. Rossiter, M.W. 1982. Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
39. Rossiter, M.W. 1997. ‘Which Science? Which Women?’, Osiris, 2nd series, 12: 169-85.
40. Sharma, K.L. 1997. Social Stratification in India: Issues and Themes. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
41. Sonnert, G. 1995. ‘What Makes a Good Scientist? Determinants of Peer Evaluation Among Biologists’, Social Studies of Science, 25 (1): 35-55.
42. Sonnert, G. and G. Holton. 1995. Gender Differences in Science Careers. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
43. Subrahmanyan, L. 1998. Women Scientists in the Third World: The Indian Experience. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
44. Toren, N. 1993. ‘The Temporal Dimensions of Gender Inequality in Academia ’, Higher Education, 25 (4): 439-55.
45. Toren, N. and D. Moore. 1998. ‘The Academic “Hurdle Race”: A Case Study’, Higher Education, 35 (3): 267-83.
46. Wallace, R.A. and A. Wolf. 1998. Contemporary Sociological Theory: Expanding the Classical Tradition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
47. Wenneras, C. and A. Wold. 1997. ‘Nepotism and Sexism in Peer-Review ’, Nature, 387 (22): 341-43.
48. White, A. 1985. ‘Women as Authors and Editors of Psychological Journals: A 10-year Perspective’, American Psychologist, 40 (5): 527-30.
49. Xie, Y. and K.A. Shauman, 1998. ‘Sex Differences In Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle’, American Sociological Review, 63 (6): 847-70.
50. Zuckerman, H. 1987. ‘Persistence and Change in the Careers of Men and Women Scientists and Engineers’, in L.S. Dix (ed.), Women: Their Underrepresentation and Career Differences in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51. Zuckerman, H. 1988. ‘The Sociology of Science’, in N. Smelser (ed.), Handbook of Sociology, pp. 511-74. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.