Memory instructions, vocalization, mock crimes, and concealed information tests with a polygraph

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 113, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 840-858

  Bradley, M T ^a   Malik, F J ^a   Cullen, M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DECEPTION; FORENSIC MEDICINE; GUILT; HOMICIDE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECALL; RECOGNITION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; AROUSAL; CUES; DECEPTION; GUILT; HOMICIDE; HUMANS; LIE DETECTION; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856977583     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: 1558688X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/07.22.27.PMS.113.6.840-858     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2002) Effects of questions' repetition and variation on the efficiency of the Guilty Knowledge Test: a re-examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 972-977.
2. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2003) The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131-151.
3. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990) Theories and applications in the detection of deception. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Bradley, M. T., & Barefoot, C. A. (2010) Eliciting information from groups: social information and the Concealed Information Test. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 42(2), 109-115.
5. Bradley, M. T., Cullen, M. E., & Carle, S. B. (1996) Control question tests by police and laboratory polygraph operators on a mock crime and real events. Polygraph, 25, 1-12.
6. Bradley, M. T., MacLaren, V. V., & Black, M. E. (1996) The Control Question Test in polygraphic examinations with actual controls for truth. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 755-762.
7. Bradley, M. T., MacLaren, V. V., & Carle, S. B. (1996) Deception and nondeception in guilty knowledge and guilty actions polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 153-160.
8. Bradley, M. T., & Rettinger, J. (1992) Awareness of crime relevant information and the Guilty Knowledge Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 55-59.
9. Bradley, M. T., & Stoica, G. (2004) Diagnosing estimate distortion due to significance testing in literature on the detection of deception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 827-839.
10. Bradley, M. T., & Warfield, J. F. (1984) Innocence, information, and the Guilty Knowledge Test in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 21, 683-689.
11. Brand, A., Bradley, M. T., Best, L. A., & Stoica, G. (2011) Multiple trials may yield exaggerated effect size estimates. Journal of General Psychology, 138, 1-11.
12. Carmel, D., Dayan, E., Naveh, A., Raveh, O., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2003) Estimating the validity of the Guilty Knowledge Test from simulated experiments: the external validity of mock crime studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 261-269.
13. Cullen, M. C., & Bradley, M. T. (2004) Positions of truthfully answered controls on Control Question Tests with the polygraph. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 167-176.
14. Elaad, E. (1990) Detection of guilty knowledge in real-life criminal investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 521-529.
15. Elaad, E., Ginton, A., & Jungman, N., (1992) Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 757-767.
16. Gamer, M., Kosiol, D., & Vossel, G. (2010) Strength of memory encoding affects physiological responses in the Guilty Actions Test. Biological Psychology, 83, 101-107.
17. Gamer, M., Rill, H., Vossel, G., & Gödert, H. W. (2006) Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 76-87.
18. Johnson, W. A., Hawley, K. J., Plewe, S. H., Elliott, J. M. G., & De Witt, M. J. (1990) Attention capture by novel stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 397-411.
19. Jokinen, A., Santtila, P., Ravaja, N., & Puttonen, S. (2006) Salience of Guilty Knowledge Test items affects accuracy in realistic mock crimes. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 175-184.
20. Lykken, D. T. (1959) The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385-388.
21. Lykken, D. T. (1998) A tremor in the blood: uses and abuses of the lie detector. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. MacLaren, V. V. (2001) A quantitative review of the Guilty Knowledge Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 674-683.
23. National Research Council. (2003) The polygraph and lie detection: Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
24. Nahari, G., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2011) Psychophysiological and behavioral measures for detecting concealed information: the role of memory for crime details. Psychophysiology, 48, 733-744.
25. Revelle, W., & Loftus, D. (1990) Individual differences and arousal: implications for the study of mood and memory. Cognition & Emotion, 4, 209-237.
26. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908) The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459-482.