The control question test in polygraphic examinations with actual controls for truth

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 85, Issue 3 PART 1, 1996, Pages 755-762

  Bradley, M T ^a   MacLaren, V V ^a   Black, M E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; GUILT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; THEFT;

ADULT; AROUSAL; CRIME; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; GUILT; HUMANS; LIE DETECTION; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THEFT; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 1842688755     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.3.755     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. ABRAMS, S. (1977) A polygraph handbook for attorneys. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
2. BEN-SHAKHAR, G., & FUREDY, J. J. (1990) Theories and applications in the detection of deception. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. BRADLEY, M. T., & RETTINGER, J. (1992) Awareness of crime-relevant information and the Guilty Knowledge Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 55-59.
4. FUREDY, J. J., DAVIS, C., & GUREVICH, M. (1988) Differentiation of deception as a psychological process: a psychophysiological approach. Psychophysiology, 25, 683-688.
5. FUREDY, J. J., POSNER, R. T., & VINCENT, A. (1991) Electrodermal differentiation of deception: perceived accuracy and perceived memorial content manipulations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 11, 91-97.
6. HONTS, C. R. (1993) A review of 'Theories and applications in the detection of deception.' Psychophysiology, 30, 317-319.
7. IACONO, W. G., & PATRICK, C. J. (1988) Assessing deception: polygraph techniques. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York: Guilford. Pp. 205-233.
8. KIRCHER, J. C., & RASKIN, D. C. (1988) Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 291-302.
9. LYKKEN, D. T. (1959) The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385-388.
10. LYKKEN, D. T. (1981) A tremor in the blood: uses and abuses of the the detector. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. LYKKEN, D. T. (1991) Why (some) Americans believe in the lie detector while others believe in the Guilty Knowledge Test. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 214-222.
12. REID, J. E., & INBAU, F. E. (1977) Truth and deception: the pohgraph ("lie detection") technique. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
13. SAXE, L., DOUGHERTY, D., & CROSS, T. (1985) The validity of polygraph testing. American Psychologist, 3, 355-366.
14. VINCENT, A., & FUREDY, J. J. (1992) Electrodermal differentiation of deception: potentially confounding and influencing factors. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13, 129-136.