Positions of truthfully answered controls on control question tests with the polygraph

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 167-176

  Cullen, Murray C ^a   Bradley, M T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3543001650     PISSN: 0008400X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087227     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abrams, S. (1977). A polygraph handbook for attorneys. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
2. Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
3. Ben-Shakhar, G., Asher, T., Poznansky-Levy, A., Asherwitz, R., & Lieblich, I. (1989). Stimulus novelty and significance as determinants of electrodermal responsivity: The serial position effect. Psychophysiology, 26, 29-38.
4. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Lieblich, I. (1982). The dichotomization theory for differential autonomic responsivity reconsidered. Psychophysiology, 19, 277-281.
6. Bradley, M. T., MacLaren, V. V., & Black, M. E. (1996). A true control polygraph control question test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 755-762.
7. Bradley, M. T., & Rettinger, J. (1992), Awareness of crime-relevant information and the Guilty Knowledge Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 55-59.
8. Honts, C. R. (1993). A review of "Theories and applications in the detection of deception." Psychophysiology, 30, 317-319.
9. Iacono, W. G., Boisvenu, G. A., & Fleming, J. A. (1984). Effects of diazepam and methylphenidate on the electrodermal detection of guilty knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 289-299.
10. Iacono, W. G., & Patrick, C. J. (1988). Assessing deception: Polygraph techniques. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 205-233). New York: The Guilford Press.
11. Kircher, J. C. & Raskin, D. C. (1988). Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 291-302.
12. Lykken, D. T. (1959). The SRR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385-388.
13. Lykken, D. T. (1981). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Raskin, D. C. (1978). Scientific assessment of the accuracy of the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 15, 344-359.
15. Reid, J. E., & Inbau, F. E. (1977). Truth and detection, the polygraph ("lie detector") technique (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
16. Saxe, L., Dougherty, D., & Cross, T. (1985). The validity of polygraph testing. American Psychologist, 3, 355-366.
17. Timm, H. W. (1982). Analyzing deception from respiration patterns. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 10, 47-51.
18. Waid, W. M., Orne, E. C. Cook, M. R., & Orne, M. T. (1978). Effects of attention, as indexed by subsequent memory, on electrodermal detection of information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 728-733.
19. Waid, W. M., Orne, E. C., & Orne, M. T., (1981). Selective memory for social information, alertness, and physiological arousal in the detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 224-232.