On the benefits and constraints of the web-based illicit drug survey

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 239-252

  Kalogeraki, Stefania ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Benefits; Constraints; Student Populations; Survey Modes; Web based Drug Surveys

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856893091     PISSN: 18331882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v06i05/52079     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B. & Preece, J. (2003). Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard to involve internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16 (2), 185-210. (Pubitemid 37439095)
2. Babbie, E. (1998). The Practice of Social Research (8th edn.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
3. Barnwell, S., Earleywine, M. & Wilcox, R. (2006). Cannabis, motivation, and life satisfaction in an internet sample. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention and Policy1, 2.
4. Bethlehem, J. (2007). Reducing the bias of Web survey based estimates. Discussion Paper 07001, Voorburg/Heerlen, Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands.
5. Bethlehem, J. (2008). How accurate are self-selection Web surveys? Discussion Paper 08014, Voorburg/Heerlen, Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands. [Online] Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/EEC0E15B-76B0-4698-9B26- 8FA04D2B3270/0/200814x10pub.pdf (15 May 2011).
6. Bethlehem, J. (2009). Applied Survey Methods, A Statistical Perspective. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Bethlehem, J. (2010). Selection bias in Web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78 (2), 161-188.
8. Bethlehem, J. (2011). Can Web surveys provide an adequate alternative to phone and face to face surveys? Survey Statistician, 63, 10-14.
9. Biffignandi, S. (2011). Internet survey methodology: Recent trends and developments. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, 679-682.
10. Birnbaum, M. (2004). Methodological and ethical issues in conducting social psychology research via the Internet. In C. Sansone, C. Morf, & A. Panter (Eds.), Handbook of Methods in Social Psychology (pp. 359-382). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Birnbaum, M. & Reips, U. (2005). Behavioral research and data collection via the Internet. In R. Proctor & K. Vu (Eds.), Handbook of Human Factors in Web Design (pp. 471-491). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Budman, S. (2000). Behavioral health care dot-com and beyond: Computer-mediated communications in mental health and substance abuse treatment. American Psychologist, 55, 1290-1300.
13. Caetano, R. (2001). Non-response in alcohol and drug surveys: A research topic in need of further attention. Addiction, 96, 1541-1545. (Pubitemid 33063454)
14. Coomber, R. (1997a). Dangerous drug adulteration. An international survey of drug dealers using the Internet and the WorldWide Web (WWW). International Journal of Drug Policy, 8, 18-28.
15. Coomber, R. (1997b). Using the internet for survey research. Sociological Research Online, 2.
16. Coomber, R. (1997c). The adulteration of drugs: What dealers do to illicit drugs and what they think is done to them. Addiction Research 5, 297-306.
17. Couper, M. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 464-494. (Pubitemid 33241092)
18. Couper, M. (2008). Designing Effective Web Surveys. New York: Cambridge University.
19. Couper, M., Traugott, M. & Lamias, M. (1999). Effective survey administration on the Web. Paper presented at the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research (MAPOR) conference, November 19-20, Chicago, Illinois.
20. Cranford, J., McCabe, S., Boyd, C., Slayden, J., Reed, M., Lange, J. & Scott, M. (2008). Reasons for nonresponse in a Web-based survey of alcohol involvement among first-year college students. Addictive Behaviors, 33 (1), 206-210. (Pubitemid 350064337)
21. Crawford, S., Couper, M. & Lamias, M. (2001). Web surveys: Perceptions of burden. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 146-162.
22. Crawford, S., McCabe, S., Couper M. & Boyd C. (2002). From mail to Web: Improving response rates and data collection efficiencies. Paper presented at the International Conference on Improving Surveys (ICIS), August 25-28, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
23. Davis, R. (1999). Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire: Comparison with traditional methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 572-577.
24. Denissen, J., Van Zalk, M. & Neumann, L. (2010). How the internet is changing the implementation of traditional research methods, people's daily lives, and the way in which developmental scientists conduct research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34 (6), 564-575.
25. Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Dillman, D. & Bowker, D. (2001). The Web questionnaire challenge to survey methodologists. In U. Reips, & M. Bosnjak, (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science, (pp. 159-178). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
27. Dommeyer, C., & Moriarty, E. (2000). Comparing two forms of an e-mail survey: Embedded vs. attached. International Journal of Market Research, 42, 39-50.
28. Duncan, D., White, J. & Nicholson, T. (2003). Using internet-based surveys to reach hidden populations: Case of nonabusive illicit drug users. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27 (3), 208-218. (Pubitemid 37123474)
29. Fan, W. & Yan, Z. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the Web survey: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 132-139.
30. Fawsett, J. & Buhle, E. (1995). Using the internet for data collection: An innovative electronic strategy. Computers in Nursing, 13, 273-279.
31. Fernández, M., Perrino, T., Collazo, J., Varga, L., Marsh, D., Hernandez, N., Rehbein, A. & Bowen, G. (2005). Surfing new territory: Club-drug use and risky sex among Hispanic men who have sex with men recruited on the internet. Journal of Urban Health, 82 (1 Suppl. 1), i79-88.
32. Fricker, R. & Schonlau, M. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of internet research surveys: Evidence from the literature. Field Methods, 14 (4), 347-367.
33. Galea, S. & Tracy, M. (2007). Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Annals of Epidemiology, 17, 643-653. (Pubitemid 47268775)
34. Groves, R. (2004). Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
35. Groves, R., Fowler, F., Couper, M., Lepkowski, J., Singer, E. & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey Methodology (2nd edn). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
36. Harrison, L. (1997). The validity of self-reported drug use in survey research: An overview and critique of research methods. In L. Harrison, A. Hughes (Eds.), The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving Accuracy of Survey Estimates (pp.17-36), Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Research Monograph, 167.
37. Hewson, C., Laurent, D. & Vogel, C. (1996). Proper methodologies for psychological and sociological studies conducted via the internet. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28, 186-191. (Pubitemid 126454811)
38. Horvitz, D. & Thompson, D. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 663-685.
39. ITU (International Telecommunication Union) (2011). Key Global Telecom Indicators for the World Telecommunication Service Sector. [Online] Available at: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/at-glance/KeyTelecom.html%20. (15 April 2011).
40. Joinson, A. (1999). Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 433-438.
41. Joinson, A. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.
42. Jones, S. & Madden, M. (2002). The internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today's technology. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project. [Online] Available at: http://www. pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2002/PIP-College-Report.pdf.pdf (19 April 2011).
43. Kaloyanides, K., McCabe, S., Cranford, J. & Teter, C. (2007). Prevalence of illicit use and abuse of prescription stimulants, alcohol and other drugs among college students: Relationship with age at initiation of prescription stimulants. Pharmacotherapy, 27, 5, 666-674. (Pubitemid 46700958)
44. Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J. & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59, 105-117. (Pubitemid 38318026)
45. Kypri, K. & Gallagher, S. (2003). Incentives to increase participation in an internet survey of alcohol use: A controlled experiment. Alcohol & Alcoholism, 38 (5), 437-441. (Pubitemid 37063385)
46. Lee, S. (2006). Propensity score adjustment as a weighting scheme for volunteer panel web surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 22 (2), 329-349.
47. Little, R. & Rubin D. (2002). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
48. McCabe, S. (2004). Comparison of Web and mail surveys in collecting illicit drug use data: A randomized experiment. Journal of Drug Education, 34 (1), 61-72. (Pubitemid 39187060)
49. McCabe, S. (2008). Misperceptions of non-medical prescription drug use: A Web survey of college students. Addicted Behaviors, 33 (5), 713-24.
50. McCabe, S. & Boyd, C. (2005). Sources of prescription drugs for illicit use. Addicted Behaviors, 30, 1342-1350. (Pubitemid 40967022)
51. McCabe, S., Boyd, C., Couper, M., Crawford, S. & D'Arcy, H. (2002). Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U.S. mail. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63 (6), 755-761. (Pubitemid 36042324)
52. McCabe, S., Boyd, C., Cranford, J., Morales, M. & Slayden J. (2006b). A modified version of the Drug Abuse Screening Test among undergraduate students. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 297-303. (Pubitemid 44425275)
53. McCabe, S., Boyd, C. & Young, A. (2007). Medical and nonmedical use of prescription drugs among secondary school students. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 76-83. (Pubitemid 44918372)
54. McCabe, S., Boyd, C., Young, A. & Crawford, S. (2004). Feasibility study for collecting alcohol and other drug use data among secondary school students: A Web-based survey approach. Journal of Drug Education, 34 (4), 373-83. (Pubitemid 40945028)
55. McCabe, S., Cranford, A., Boyd, C. & Teter, C. (2007b). Motives, diversion and routes of administration associated with non-medical use of prescription opioids. Addicted Behaviors, 32, 562-575. (Pubitemid 46038570)
56. McCabe, S., Diez, A., Boyd, C., Nelson, T. & Weitzman, E. (2006a). Comparing Web and mail responses in a mixed mode survey in college alcohol use research. Addictive Behaviors, 31 (9), 1619-1627. (Pubitemid 44160742)
57. McCabe, S., Morales, M., Cranford, J., Delva, J., McPherson, M. & Boyd, C. (2007a). Race/ethnicity and gender differences in drug use and abuse among college students. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 6 (2), 75-95.
58. McCabe, S., & Teter, C. (2007). Drug use related problems among non-medical users of prescription stimulants: A Web-based survey of college students from a Midwestern university. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 91, 69-76. (Pubitemid 47385032)
59. McCabe, S., Teter, C. & Boyd, C. (2004). The use, misuse and diversion of prescription stimulants among middle and high school students. Substance Use and Misuse, 39 (7), 1095-1116. (Pubitemid 39163121)
60. McCabe, S., Teter, C. & Boyd, C. (2006a). Medical Use, illicit use and diversion of prescription stimulant medication. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 38, 43-56.
61. McCabe, E., Teter, C. & Boyd C. (2006b). Medical use, illicit use, and diversion of abusable prescription drugs. Journal of American College Health, 54, 269-78. (Pubitemid 43439968)
62. McMorris, B., Petrie, R., Catalano, R., Fleming, C., Haggerty, K., & Abbott, R. (2009). Use of Web and in-person survey modes to gather data from young adults on sex and drug use: An evaluation of cost, time, and survey error based on a randomized mixed-mode design. Evaluation Review, 33 (2), 138-158.
63. Miller, P., Johnston, J., McElwee, P. & Noble, R. (2007). A pilot study using the internet to study patterns of party drug use: Processes, findings and limitations. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26, 169-174.
64. Miller, P. & Sønderlund, A. (2010). Using the internet to research hidden populations of illicit drug users: A review. Addiction, 105, 1557-1567.
65. Nicholson, T., White, J., & Duncan, D. (1998). Drugnet: A pilot study of adult recreational drug use via the WWW. Substance Abuse, 19 (3), 109-121. (Pubitemid 28455461)
66. Nicholson, T., White, J., & Duncan, D. (1999). A survey of adult recreational drug use via the World Wide Web: The DRUGNET study. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 31, 415-422. (Pubitemid 30039262)
67. Onoye, J., Goebert, D. & Nishimura, S. (2010). Use of incentives and Web-based administration for surveying student alcohol and substance use in an ethnically diverse sample. Journal of Substance Use, 1-11.
68. Oppermann, M. (1995). E-mail surveys: Potential and pitfalls. Marketing Research: A Magazine of Management and Applications, 7 (3), 28-33.
69. Pealer, L, Weiler, R, Pigg, R., Miller, D. & Dorman, S. (2001). The feasibility of a Web-based surveillance system to collect health risk behavior data from college students. Health Education & Behavior, 28 (5), 547-559. (Pubitemid 33602904)
70. Reneau, J., Nicholson, T., White, J. & Duncan, D. (2000). The general well-being of recreational drug users: A survey on the WWW. International Journal of Drug Policy, 11, 315-323.
71. Rhodes, S., Bowie, D. & Hegrenrather, K. (2003). Collecting behavioral data using the World Wide Web: Considerations for researchers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 68-73. (Pubitemid 36054878)
72. Roberts, L. (2007). Opportunities and constraints of electronic research. In R. Reynolds, R. Woods & J. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements (19-27). Pennsylvania: Idea Group Inc.
73. Rosenbaum, P. & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
74. Schmidt, W. (1997). World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29, 274-279. (Pubitemid 127710769)
75. Schonlau, M., Van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A. & Couper, M. (2006). Selection bias in Web surveys and the use of propensity scores. RAND Working Paper No. WR-279. [Online] Available at:http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/ pubs/working-papers/2006/RAND-WR279.pdf (2 April 2011).
76. Shih, T. & Fan, X. (2008). Comparing response rates from Web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods, 20, 249-271.
77. Smith, M. & Leigh, B. (1997). Virtual subjects: Using the internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29 (4), 496-505. (Pubitemid 127710801)
78. Stetina, B., Jagsch, R., Schramel, C., Maman, T., Kryspin-Exner, I. (2008). Exploring hidden populations: Recreational drug users. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2 (1). [Online] Available at: http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku= 2008060201&article=1 (18 April 2011)
79. Teter, C., McCabe, S., Cranford, J., Boyd, C. & Guthrie, S. (2005). Prevalence and motives for illicit use of prescription stimulants in an undergraduate student sample. Journal of American College Health, 53, 253-262. (Pubitemid 40720541)
80. Teter, C., McCabe, S., LaGrange, K., Cranford, J. & Boyd, C. (2006). Illicit use of specific prescription stimulants among college students: Prevalence, motives, and routes of administration. Pharmacotherapy, 26, 1501-1510. (Pubitemid 44521735)
81. Thach, L. (1995). Using electronic mail to conduct survey research. Educational Technology, 35, 27-31.
82. Thayer, S. & Ray, S. (2006).Online communication preferences across age, gender and duration of Internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9, 432-440. (Pubitemid 44763212)
83. Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey research and societal change. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 775-801.
84. Wang, Y., Lee, C., Lew-Ting, C., Hsiao, C., Chen, D. & Chen, W. (2005). Survey of substance use among high school students in Taipei: Web-based questionnaire versus paper-and-pencil questionnaire. Adolescent Medicine, 289-295. (Pubitemid 41338016)
85. Weisberg, H. (2005). The Total Survey Error Approach: A Guide to the New Science of Survey Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86. White, B., Becker-Blease, K. & Grace-Bishop K. (2006). Stimulant medication use, misuse, and abuse in an undergraduate and graduate student sample. Journal of American College Health, 54, 261-268.
87. Wright, K. (2005). Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and Web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (3), article 11. [Online] Available at: http://jcmc.indiana. edu/vol10/issue3/wright.html (28 May 2011)
88. Ye, J. (2007). Overcoming challenges to conducting online surveys. In R. Reynolds, R. Woods & J. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements (83-89). Pennsylvania: Idea Group Inc.
89. Yokley, J., Coleman, D. & Yates, B. (1990). Cost effectiveness of three child mental health assessment methods: Computer-assisted assessment is effective and inexpensive. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 17, 99-07.
90. Zhang, Y. (2000). Using the internet for survey research: A case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 5, 57-68. (Pubitemid 30526377)
91. Zhao, J. Stockwell, T. & Macdonald, S. (2009). Non-response bias in alcohol and drug population surveys. Drug Alcohol Review, 28 (6), 648-657.