Web surveys: Perceptions of burden

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 146-162

  Crawford, Scott D ^a   Couper, Mick P ^b   Lamias, Mark J ^b  

^a Market Strategies Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Affirmative action; Internet; Online surveys; Survey methodology; Web surveys

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035531601     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089443930101900202     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Bogen, K. (1996). The effect of questionnaire length on response rates - A review of the literature. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section (pp. 1020-1025). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
2. Bradburn, N. M. (1978). Respondent burden. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, survey research methods section (pp. 35-40). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
3. Couper, M. P., Blair, J., and Triplett, T. (1999). A comparison of mail and e-mail for a survey of employees in federal statistical agencies. Journal of Official Statistics, 15(1), 39-56.
4. Couper, M. P., Traugott, M., & Lamias, M. (2000). Web survey design and administration. University of Michigan, Survey Research Center, Ann Arbor. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys; the total design method. New York: Wiley.
6. Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. P. (1998). Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: Wiley.
7. Guterbock, T. M., Meekins, B. J., Weaver, A. C., & Fries, J. C. (2000, May). Web versus paper: A mode experiment in a survey of university computing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Portland, OR.
8. Jeavons, A. (1998). Ethology and the Web: Observing respondent behaviour in Web surveys. Proceedings of the Worldwide Internet Conference, Amsterdam: ESOMAR.
9. Kwak, N., & Radler, B. T. (2000, May). Using the Web for public opinion research: A comparative analysis between data collected via mail and the Web. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Portland, OR.
10. Medlin, C., Roy, S., & Ham Chai, T. (1999, November/December). World Wide Web versus mail surveys: A comparison and report. Paper presented at ANZMAC99 Conference: Marketing in the Third Millennium, Sydney, Australia.
11. Schaefer, D. R., and Dillman, D. A. (1998). Development of a standard e-mail methodology: Results of an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(3), 378-397.
12. Weible, R., and Wallace, J. (1998). Cyber research: The impact of the Internet on data collection. Marketing Research, 10(3), 19-24, 31.