Online communication preferences across age, gender, and duration of Internet use

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 432-440

  Thayer, Stacy E ^a   Ray, Sukanya ^b  

^a Linkage Inc   (United States)

^b SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; FAMILY; FEMALE; FRIENDSHIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMMUNICATION; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERENCE VALUES; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33751073464     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.432     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Talamo, A., & Ligorio, B. (2001). Strategic identities in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4:109-122.
2. Levine, D. (2000). Virtual attraction: what rocks your boat? CyberPsychology & Behavior 3:565-573.
3. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., et al. (1998). Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist 53:1017-1031.
4. Moody, E. (2001). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4:393-401.
5. Kiesler, S. (ed.) (1997). Culture of the Internet. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Shields, R. (eds.). (1996). Cultures of the Internet: virtual space, real histories, and living bodies. London: SAGE.
7. Caldwell, M.A., Peplau, L.A. (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendships. Sex Roles 8:721-732.
8. Wellman, B. (1992). Men in networks: private communities, domestic friendships. In: P.M. Nardi (ed.), Men's friendships, London: SAGE, pp. 74-114.
9. Moore, G. (1990). Gender and relationships: a developmental account. American Psychologist 55:726-735.
10. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2000). Tracking online life: how women use the Internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends. Available at: 〈www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=11〉.
11. Boneva, B., Kraut, R., & Frohlich, A. (2006). Using email for personal relationships: the difference gender makes. American Behavioral Scientist (in press).
12. Weiser, E. (2001). The functions of Internet use and their social and psychological consequences. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4:723-742.
13. Weiser, E. (2000). Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: a two-sample comparison. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4:167-178.
14. Lee, B., Anderson, J. (2000). Current attitudes of Internet users (submitted).
15. Herring, S.C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronique de Communication 3:2. Available at: 〈COMSERVE@vm.its.rpi.edu〉.
16. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2001). Wired seniors: a fervent few, inspired by family ties. Available at: 〈www.pewinternet.org/ reports/toc.asp? Report=40〉.
17. Howard, P., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet: the impact of diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist 45:450-472.
18. Waxman, H., Ray, S., & McCabe, M. (2000). Online cultural differences unpublished manuscript, Suffolk University.
19. Joinson, A. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: reciprocal self-disclosure in internet- based surveys. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4:587-591.
20. Eaton, J., & Struther, C. (2002). Using the Internet for organizational research: a study of cynicism in the workplace. CyberPsychology & Behavior 5:305-313.