Feasibility study for collecting alcohol and other drug use data among secondary school students: A web-based survey approach

Journal of Drug Education

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 373-383

  McCabe, Sean Esteban ^a   Boyd, Carol J ^a   Young, Amy ^a   Crawford, Scott ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Survey Sciences Group LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ABSENTEEISM; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNIC GROUP; EXAMINATION; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH SURVEY; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; RANDOMIZATION; SAMPLE SIZE; SPRING; STUDENT; TIME; URBAN AREA;

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; DATA COLLECTION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; STUDENTS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 21744440095     PISSN: 00472379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/TGMB-0X3Q-6PV1-9A6W     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. A. Kleiner, L. Lewis, and B. Greene, Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994-2002, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 2004-011), U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C., 2003.
2. T. J. Beebe, T. Mika, P. A. Harrison, R. E. Anderson, and J. A. Fulkerson, Computerized School Surveys, Social Science Computer Review, 15, pp. 159-169, 1997.
3. T. J. Beebe, P. A. Harrison, J. A. McRae, R. E. Anderson, and J. A. Fulkerson, An Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews in a School Setting, Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, pp. 623-632, 1998.
4. M. J. C. Van Hattum and E. D. de Leeuw, A Disk by Mail Survey of Pupils in Primary Schools: Data Quality and Logistics, Journal of Official Statistics, 15, pp. 413-429, 1999.
5. R. M. Carini, J. H. Hayek, G. D. Kuh, J. M. Kennedy, and J. A. Ouimet, College Student Responses to Web and Paper Surveys: Does Mode Matter? Research in Higher Education, 44, pp. 1-19, 2003.
6. K. Kypri and S. J. Gallagher, Incentives to Increase Participation in an Internet Survey of Alcohol Use: A Controlled Experiment, Alcohol and Alcoholism, 38, pp. 437-441, 2003.
7. S. E. McCabe, Gender Differences in Collegiate Risk Factors for Heavy Episodic Drinking, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, pp. 49-56, 2002.
8. S. E. McCabe, Survey Mode Effects for Self-Reporting Illicit Drug Use: Web vs. U.S. Mail, Journal of Drug Education, 34, pp. 61-72, 2004.
9. S. E. McCabe, C. J. Boyd, M.P. Couper, S. Crawford, and H. d'Arcy, Mode Effects for Collecting Alcohol and Other Drug Use Data: Web and U.S. Mail, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, pp. 755-761, 2002.
10. E. T. Miller, D. J. Neal, L. J. Roberts, J. S. Baer, S. O. Cressler, J. Metrik, and G. A. Marlatt, Test-Retest Reliability of Alcohol Measures: Is There a Difference Between Internet-Based Assessment and Traditional Methods? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, pp. 56-63, 2002.
11. L. N. Pealer, R. M. Weiler, R. M. Pigg, D. Miller, and S. M. Dorman, The Feasibility of a Web-Based Surveillance System to Collect Health Risk Behaviors from College Students, Health Education and Behavior, 28, pp. 547-559, 2001.
12. S. Wygant and R. Lindorf, Surveying Collegiate Net Surfers - Web Methodology or Mythology, Quirk's Marketing Research Review, accesed May 2002. Available online at: http://www.quirks.com/articles/article.asp?arg_ArticleId= 515.
13. J. J. Bason, Comparison of Telephone, Mail, Web, and IVR Surveys of Drug and Alcohol Use among University of Georgia Students, paper presented at the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Portland, Oregon, May 2000.
14. M. P. Couper, M. Traugott, and M. Lamias, Web Survey Design and Administration, Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, pp. 230-253, 2001.
15. N. Kwak and B. Radler, A Comparison Between Mail and Web Surveys: Response Pattern, Respondent Profile, and Data Quality, Journal of Official Statistics, 18, pp. 257-273, 2002.
16. T. K. L. Schleyer and J. L. Forrest, Methods for the Design and Administration of Web-based Surveys, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 7, pp. 416-425, 2000.
17. L. D. Johnston, P. M. O'Malley, and J. G. Bachman, Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2001, Volume I: Secondary School Students (NIH Publication No. 02-5106), National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland, 2002.
18. Standard and Poor's, School Evaluation Services, New York, accessed September 2002. Available online at: http://www.ses.standardandpoors.com/.
19. M. Fendrich and T. P. Johnson, Examining Prevalence Differences in Three National Surveys of Youth: Impact of Consent Procedures, Mode and Editing Rules, Journal of Drug Issues, 31, pp. 615-642, 2001.
20. J. A. Grunbaum, L. Kann, S. A. Kinchen, B. Williams, J. G. Ross, R. Lowry, and L. Kolbe, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2001, accessed July 2002. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/ mmwrhtml/ss5104a1.htm.
21. L. D. Johnston, P. M. O'Malley, and J. G. Bachman, Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2000, Volume I: Secondary School Students (NIH Publication No. 01-4924), National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland, 2001.
22. American Association for Public Opinion Research, Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Response Rate #2 (3rd Edition), AAPOR, Lenexa, Kansas, 2004.
23. L. D. Johnston, P. M. O'Malley, and J. G. Bachman, Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2002, Volume I: Secondary School Students (NIH Publication No. 03-5375), National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland, 2003.
24. M. P. Couper, Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches, Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, pp. 464-494, 2000.
25. C. F. Turner, L. Ku, S. M. Rogers, L. D. Lindberg, J. H. Pleck, and F. L. Sonenstein, Adolescent Sexual Behavior, Drug Use, and Violence: Increased Reporting with Computer Survey Technology, Science, 280, pp. 867-873, 1998.
26. S. Crawford, S. E., McCabe, M. P. Couper, and C. J. Boyd, From Mail to Web: Improving Response Rates and Data Collection Efficiencies, paper presented at the International Conference on Improving Surveys, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 2002.
27. L. D. Johnston and P. M. O'Malley, Issues of Validity and Population Coverage in Student Surveys of Drug Use, NIDA Research Monograph, 57, pp. 31-54, 1985.
28. M. D. Kaplowitz, T. D. Hadlock, and R. Levine, A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates, Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, pp. 94-101, 2004.
29. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Results from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (DHHS Publication No. SMA 03-3836, NHSDA Series H-22), Office of Applied Studies, Rockville, Maryland, 2003.
30. S. P. Schinke, J. Di Noia, and J. R. Glassman, Computer-Mediated Intervention to Prevent Drug Abuse and Violence among High-Risk Youth, Addictive Behaviors, 29, pp. 225-229, 2004.
31. H. Skinner, O. Maley, L. Smith, S. Chirrey, and M. Morrison, New Frontiers: Using the Web to Engage Teens in Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment, in Adolescents, Alcohol, and Substance Abuse, P. Monti, S. M. Colby, and T. A. O'Leary (eds.), Guilford Press, New York, pp. 297-318, 2001.