Validation and verification of measurement methods in clinical chemistry

Bioanalysis

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 305-320

  Theodorsson, Elvar ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FREEZE THAWING; IN VITRO STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LABORATORY TEST; LIMIT OF DETECTION; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NOMENCLATURE; PH MEASUREMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SAMPLING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THERMOSTABILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACCREDITATION; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY TESTS; LIMIT OF DETECTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNCERTAINTY; VALIDATION STUDIES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84856839506     PISSN: 17576180     EISSN: 17576199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4155/bio.11.311     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Viswanathan CT, Bansal S, Booth B et al. Workshop/conference report - quantitative bioanalytical methods validation and implementation: best practices for chromatographic and ligand binding assays. AAPS J. 9(1), E30-E42 (2007). (Pubitemid 46296546)
2. Shah VP, Midha KK, Dighe S et al. Analytical methods validation - bioavailability, bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic studies. Pharm. Res. 9(4), 588-592 (1992).
3. Shah VP, Midha KK, Findlay JW et al. Bioanalytical method validation - a revisit with a decade of progress. Pharm. Res. 17(12), 1551-1557 (2000). (Pubitemid 32217566)
4. Viswanathan CT, Bansal S, Booth B et al. Quantitative bioanalytical methods validation and implementation: best practices for chromatographic and ligand binding assays. Pharm. Res. 24(10), 1962-1973 (2007). (Pubitemid 47389236)
5. Blume H, Brendel E, Brudny-Kloppel M et al. Workshop/conference report on European Medicine Agency draft guideline on validation of bioanalytical methods. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 42(3), 300-305 (2011).
6. Haeckel R. Verification, validation and evaluation of analytical procedures in laboratory medicine. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 42(1), 111-112 (2004). (Pubitemid 38401481)
7. Menditto A, Patriarca M, Magnusson B. Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 12, 45-47 (2007).
8. Lee JW, Devanarayan V, Barrett YC et al. Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement. Pharm. Res. 23(2), 312-328 (2006). (Pubitemid 43237862)
9. Lee JW, Hall M. Method validation of protein biomarkers in support of drug development or clinical diagnosis/prognosis. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 877(13), 1259-1271 (2009).
10. AOAC guidelines for single laboratory validation of chemical methods for dietary supplements and botanicals (2002).
11. Van Amsterdam P, Arnold M, Bansal S et al. Building the global bioanalysis consortium - working towards a functional globally acceptable and harmonized guideline on bioanalytical method validation. Bioanalysis 2(11), 1801-1803 (2010).
12. Van Amsterdam P, Lausecker B, Luedtke S, Timmerman P, Brudny-Kloeppel M. Towards harmonized regulations for bioanalysis: moving forward! Bioanalysis 2(4), 689-691 (2010).
13. Shah VP. The history of bioanalytical method validation and regulation: evolution of a guidance document on bioanalytical methods validation. AAPS J. 9(1), E43-E47 (2007).
14. Shahaigan S, Cohn RD, Gaunt EE, Krolak JM. System to monitor a portion of the total testing process in medical clinics and laboratories: evaluation of a split-specimen design. Clin. Chem. 45(2), 269-280 (1999). (Pubitemid 29079127)
15. Thienpont LM, Stockl D, D'hondt H. Method validation across the disciplines- Critical investigation of major validation criteria and associated experimental protocols. J. Chromatogr. B 877(23), 2180-2190 (2009).
16. Hibbert DB. Method Validation. Elsevier, Oxford (2005).
17. Rozet E, Marini RD, Ziemons E, Boulanger B, Hubert P. Advances in validation, risk and uncertainty assessment of bioanalytical methods. J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. 55(4), 848-858 (2011).
18. Thompson M, Ellison LR, Wood R. Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis. Pure Appl. Chem. 74(5), 835-855 (2002).
19. Hartmann C, Smeyers-Verbeke J, Massart DL, Mcdowall RD. Validation of bioanalytical chromatographic methods. J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. 17(2), 193-218 (1998). (Pubitemid 28261471)
20. Wood R. How to validate analytical methods. Trends Anal. Chem. 18(9-10), 624-632 (1999). (Pubitemid 29418018)
21. Wieling J, Hendriks G, Tamminga WJ et al. Rational experimental design for bioanalytical methods validation - Illustration using an assay method for total captopril in plasma. J. Chromatogr. A 730(1-2), 381-394 (1996).
22. Rozet E, Ceccato A, Hubert C et al. Analysis of recent pharmaceutical regulatory documents on analytical method validation. J. Chromatogr. A 1158(1-2), 111-125 (2007). (Pubitemid 47028571)
23. Massart DL, Dijkstra A, Kaufman L. Evaluation and Optimization of Laboratory Methods and Analytical Procedures. Elsevier Scientific Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1978).
24. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). User verification of performance for precision and trueness; approved guideline. 25(17), EP15-A2 (2006).
25. Haeckel R, Römer M, Sonntag O, Vassault A, Naudin C. Recommendations for the multicentre evaluation of analytical systems in clinical chemistry. In: Evaluation Methods in Laboratory Medicine. Haeckel R (Ed.). VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 47-69 (1993).
26. Haeckel R, Busch EW, Jemmings RD, Truchaud A. European Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (ECCLS) guidelines for the evaluation of analyzer in clinical chemistry. ECCLS Document 3(2) 7-8, Beuth Verlag GmbH Berlin, Germany (1986).
27. Haeckel R. Decision criteria for the selection of analytical instruments used in clinical chemistry. J. Automatic Chemistry 2, 22-33 (1980).
28. Haeckel R. Evaluation Methods in Laboratory Medicine. VCH, Weinheim, Germany (1993).
29. Hibbert DB. Method validation of modern analytical techniques. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 4(8), 352-356 (1999).
30. Hibbert RB. Method validation of modern analytical techniques. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 4, 352-356 (1999).
31. Barwick VJ, Ellison SLR, Raffaerty MJQ, Gill RS. The evaluation of measurement uncertainty from method validation studies. Part 2: the practical application of laboratory protocol. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 5, 104-113 (2000).
32. Knottnerus JA, Muris JW. Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 56(11), 1118-1128 (2003). (Pubitemid 37386337)
33. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ 326(7379), 41-44 (2003). (Pubitemid 36110721)
34. Williams DR. Minimum criteria for validation of analytical methods. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 69, 432-436 (1986).
35. Permanent Liaison Group between EAL (European co-operation for Accreditation of Laboratories) and EUROLAB. Validation of test methods. General principles and concepts. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 3, 29-32 (1998).
36. Holmgren M. Validation of test methods. General principles and concepts. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 3, 29-32 (1998).
37. De Bièvre P, Günzler H. Validation in Chemical Measurement. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2004).
38. Taverniers I, De Loose M, Van Bocksraele E. Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. II. Analytical method validation and quality assurance. Trends Anal. Chem. 23(8), 535-552 (2004). (Pubitemid 39222150)
39. Guder WG. Diagnostic samples: From the Patient to the Laboratory: The Impact of Preanalytical Variables on the Quality of Laboratory Results (4th Edition). Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (2009).
40. Ellison SLR, Farrant TJ, Barwick V. Practical Statistics for the Analytical Scientist: a Bench Guide (2nd Edition). RSC Publishing, Cambridge, UK (2009).
41. Peters FT, Drummer OH, Musshoff F. Validation of new methods. Forensic Sci. Int. 165(2-3), 216-224 (2007). (Pubitemid 46073540)
42. Carey RN, Garber CC. Evaluation of methods. In: Clinical Chemistry Theory, Analyses, and Correlation. Kaplan LA, Pesce AJ (Eds). The CV Mosby Company, MO, USA, 338-359 (1984).
43. Carey RNG, Koch DD. Concepts and Practices in the Evaluation of Laboratory Methods. Workshop, LA, USA (1994).
44. Koch DD, Peters T. Selection and evaluation of methods. In: Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. Burtis CA, Ashwood ER (Eds). WB Saunders Company, PA, USA (1994).
45. Peters T, Westgard JO. Evaluation of methods. In: Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. Tietz NW (Ed.). WB Saunders, PA, USA 410-423 (1986).
46. Hackney J, Cembrowski G. Need for improved instrument and kit evaluation. Am. J. Clin. Pathol 86, 391-393 (1986). (Pubitemid 16023574)
47. Haeckel R, Weber C. Evaluation of automated equipment. In: Clinical Biochemistry Principles, Methods, Applications. Lawson AM, Curtis HC, Roth M. (Eds). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, 549-563 (1991).
48. Jennings L, Van Deerlin VM, Gulley ML. Recommended principles and practices for validating clinical molecular pathology tests. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 133(5), 743-755 (2009).
49. Rifai N, Gerszten RE. Biomarker discovery and validation. Clin. Chem. 52(9), 1635-1637 (2006). (Pubitemid 44330692)
50. Rifai N, Gillette MA, Carr SA. Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility. Nat. Biotechnol. 24(8), 971-983 (2006). (Pubitemid 44215392)
51. Feinberg M, Laurentie M. A global approach to method validation and measurement uncertainty. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 11(1-2), 3-9 (2006). (Pubitemid 43562061)
52. Chan CC. Analytical Method Validation and Instrument Performance Verification. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA (2004).
53. Desilva B, Smith W, Weiner R et al. Recommendations for the bioanalytical method validation of ligand-binding assays to support pharmacokinetic assessments of macromolecules. Pharm. Res. 20(11), 1885-1900 (2003). (Pubitemid 37449466)
54. Riley CM, Rosanske TW. Development and Validation of Analytical Methods (1st Edition). Pergamon, Tarrytown, NY, USA (1996).
55. Chan CC, Lam H, Zhang X-M. Practical Approaches to Method Validation and Essential Instrument Performance Verification. Wiley, NJ, USA (2010).
56. Aarons L, Toon S, Rowland M. Validation of assay methodology used in pharmacokinetic studies. J. Pharmacol Methods 17, 337-346 (1987). (Pubitemid 17100532)
57. Schofield TL. Assay validation. In: Encyclopedia of Biopharmaceutical Statistics. Informa Healthcare, London, UK, 63-71 (2003).
58. Holtzman WH. The unbiased estimate of the population variance and standard deviation. Am. J. Psychol. 63(4), 615-617 (1950).
59. Shewhart WA. Statistical Method From the Viewpoint of Quality Control. Dover Publications, NY, USA (1939).
60. Aronsson T, Groth T. Nested control procedures for internal analytical quality control. Theoretical design and practical evaluation. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 44, 51-64 (1984). (Pubitemid 15177960)
61. Rao CR, Kleffe J. Estimation of Variance Components and Applications. Elsevier Science Publications, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3 (1988).
62. Searle SR, Casella G, Mccullogh CE. Variance Components. John Wiley & Sons, NJ, USA (1992).
63. Cox DR, Solomon PJ. Components of Variance. Chapman & Hall/CRC, FL, USA (2003).
64. Dybkaer R. From total allowable error via metrological traceability to uncertainty of measurement of the unbiased result. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 4(9-10), 401-405 (1999).
65. Rozet E, Marini RD, Ziemons E et al. Total error and uncertainty: friends or foes? Trends Anal. Chem. 30(5), 797-806 (2011).
66. Krouwer JS. How to improve total error modeling by accounting for error sources beyond imprecision and bias. Clin. Chem. 47(7), 1329-1331 (2001). (Pubitemid 32579133)
67. Krouwer JS. Setting performance goals and evaluating total analytical error for diagnostic assays. Clin. Chem. 48(6 Pt 1), 919-927 (2002). (Pubitemid 34587593)
68. Krouwer JS. Critique of the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement method of estimating and reporting uncertainty in diagnostic assays. Clin. Chem. 49(11), 1818-1821 (2003). (Pubitemid 37340315)
69. Westgard JO. Managing quality vs. measuring uncertainty in the medical laboratory. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 48(1), 31-40 (2010).
70. Westgard JO, Carey RN, Wold S. Criteria for judging precision and accuracy in method development and evaluation. Clin. Chem. 20, 825-833 (1974).
71. Magnusson B, Ellison SLR. Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 390(1), 201-213 (2008).
72. Debrus B, Lebrun P, Kindenge JM et al. Innovative high-performance liquid chromatography method development for the screening of 19 antimalarial drugs based on a generic approach, using design of experiments, independent component analysis and design space. J. Chromatogr. A 1218(31), 5205-5215 (2011).
73. Marini RD, Chiap P, Boulanger B et al. LC method for the determination of R-timolol in S-timolol maleate: validation of its ability to quantify and uncertainty assessment. Talanta 68(4), 1166-1175 (2006). (Pubitemid 43088688)
74. Meyer JS, Quenzer LF. Psychopharmacology: Drugs, the Brain, and Behavior. Sinauer Associates, MA, USA (2005).
75. Wu SL, Li W, Wells A, Dasgupta A. Digoxin-like and digitoxin-like immunoreactive substances in elderly people. Impact on therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin and digitoxin concentrations. Am. J. Clin. Path. 115(4), 600-604 (2001). (Pubitemid 32275953)
76. Waxman SG. From Neuroscience to Neurology: Neuroscience, Molecular Medicine and the Therapeutic Transformation of Neurology. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2005).
77. Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N. Engl. J Med. 361(9), 858-867 (2009).
78. Feinberg M, Boulanger B, Dewe W, Hubert P. New advances in method validation and measurement uncertainty aimed at improving the quality of chemical data. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 380(3), 502-514 (2004).
79. Patriarca M, Castelli M, Corsetti F, Menditto A. Estimate of uncertainty of measurement from a single-laboratory validation study: application to the determination of lead in blood. Clin. Chem. 50(8), 1396-1405 (2004). (Pubitemid 38970648)
80. Galen RS, Gambino SR. Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. John Wiley & Sons, NJ, USA (1975).
81. Pepe MS. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2003).
82. Zhou X-H, Obuchowski NA, Mcclish DK. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley-Interscience, NY, USA (2002).
83. Dybkaer R. From total allowable error via metrological traceability to uncertainty of measurement of the unbiased result. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 4, 401-405 (1999).
84. Dati F. The new European directive on in vitro diagnostics. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 41(10), 1289-1298 (2003). (Pubitemid 37266116)
85. Stankovic AK, Romeo P. The role of in vitro diagnostic companies in reducing laboratory error. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 45(6), 781-788 (2007). (Pubitemid 46956248)
86. Passing H, Bablock W. Comparison of several regression procedures for method comparison studies and determination of sample sizes. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry. Part II. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem.22, 431-445 (1984). (Pubitemid 14086507)
87. Deming WE. Statistical Adjustment of Data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Oxford, UK (1943).
88. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327, 307-310 (1986). (Pubitemid 16134762)
89. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 32, 307-317 (1983).