Nanotextured substrates with immobilized aptamers for cancer cell isolation and cytology

Cancer

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1145-1154

  Wan, Yuan ^a,b   Mahmood, M Arif Iftakher ^a,b   Li, Na ^c   Allen, Peter B ^d   Kim, Young Tae ^a,b   Bachoo, Robert ^e,f   Ellington, Andrew D ^d   Iqbal, Samir M ^a,b  

^a The University of Texas at Arlington   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^c AM Biotechnologies   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

basement membrane; circulating tumor cells; human glioblastoma; lab on chip; microscopy; nanotextured materials; polydimethylsiloxane; RNA aptamers

Indexed keywords

APTAMER; DIMETICONE; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; RNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DENSITY; CELL ISOLATION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL SURFACE; CIRCULATING TUMOR CELL; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; GLIOBLASTOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMOBILIZED CELL; LAB ON A CHIP; NANOANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTOR AFFINITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BASEMENT MEMBRANE; CANCER CELL LINE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NUCLEIC ACID IMMOBILIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE AREA; SURFACE PROPERTY;

APTAMERS, NUCLEOTIDE; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CELL SEPARATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CYTODIAGNOSIS; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; DIMETHYLPOLYSILOXANES; FIBROBLASTS; GLIOBLASTOMA; HUMANS; LACTIC ACID; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASTIC CELLS, CIRCULATING; NYLONS; POLYGLYCOLIC ACID; RECEPTOR, EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR;

EID: 84856808809     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26349     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Curry SJ, Byers T, Hewitt, eds. Fulfilling the Potential of Cancer Prevention and Early Detection. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003.
2. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ,. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006; 56: 11-25; quiz 49-50.
3. Swennenhuis JF, Tibbe AG, Levink R, Sipkema RC, Terstappen LW,. Characterization of circulating tumor cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytometry A. 2009; 75A: 520-527.
4. Dharmasiri U, Witek MA, Adams AA, Soper SA,. Microsystems for the capture of low-abundance cells. Annu Rev Anal Chem. 2010; 3: 409-431.
5. Tan S, Yobas L, Lee GY, Ong CN, Lim CT,. Microdevice for the isolation and enumeration of cancer cells from blood. Biomed Microdevices. 2009; 11: 883-892.
6. MacDonald MP, Neale S, Paterson L, Richies A, Dholakia K, Spalding GC,. Cell cytometry with a light touch: sorting microscopic matter with an optical lattice. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2004; 18: 200-205.
7. Nagrath S, Sequist LV, Maheswaran S, et al. Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology. Nature. 2007; 450: 1235-1239.
8. Fischer NO, Tarasow TM, Tok JB,. Aptasensors for biosecurity applications. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007; 11: 316-328.
9. Adams AA, Okagbare PI, Feng J, et al. Highly efficient circulating tumor cell isolation from whole blood and label-free enumeration using polymer-based microfluidics with an integrated conductivity sensor. J Am Chem Soc. 2008; 130: 8633-8641.
10. Toner M, Irimia D,. Blood on a chip. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2005; 7: 77-103.
11. Bunka DHJ, Stockley PG,. Aptamers come of ageâat last. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006; 4: 588-596.
12. Wan Y, Kim Y-t, Li N, Ellington AD, Iqbal SM,. Aptamer-based Lab-on-Chip for Cancer Cell Isolation. Paper presented at: ASME 2010: First Global Congress on Nanoengineering for Medicine and Biology (NEMB 2010); February 7-10, 2010; Houston, Tex.
13. Liotta LA, Tyggvason K, Garbisa S, Hart I, Foltz CM, Shafie S,. Metastatic potential correlates with enzymatic degradation of basement membrane collagen. Nature. 1980; 284: 67-68.
14. Ruoslahti E,. How cancer spreads. Sci Am. 1996; 275: 72-77.
15. Ayad S, Boot-Handford RP, Humphries MJ, Kadler KE, Shuttleworth CA,. The Extracellular Matrix Factsbook. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press; 1998.
16. Thapa A, Miller DC, Webster JH, Haberstroh KM,. Nano-structured polymers enhance bladder smooth muscle cell function. Biomaterials. 2003; 247: 2915-2926.
17. Miller DC, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ,. Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) with nano-structured surface features. Biomaterials. 2004; 25: 53-61.
18. Hufnagel H, Huebner A, Gulch C, Guse K, Abell LC, Hollfelder F,. An integrated cell culture lab on a chip: modular microdevices for cultivation of mammalian cells and delivery into microfluidic microdroplets. Lab Chip. 2009; 9: 1576-1582.
19. Osborne SE, Matsumura I, Ellington AD,. Aptamers as therapeutic and diagnostic reagents: problems and prospects. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 1997; 1: 5-9.
20. Wan Y, Kim Y, Li N, et al. Surface immobilized aptamers for cancer cell isolation and microscopic cytology. Cancer Res. 2010; 70: 9371-9380.
21. Seal S, Kalita SJ,. Nanostructured biomaterials. In:, Lockwood DJ, ed. Functional Nanostructures. New York: Springer; 2008: 168-219.
22. Lee JN, Park C, Whitesides GM,. Solvent compatibility of poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based microfluidic devices. Anal Chem. 2003; 75: 6544-6554.
23. Iqbal SM, Akin D, Bashir R,. Solid-state nanopore channels with DNA selectivity. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007; 2: 243-248.
24. Sui G, Wang J, Lee CC, et al. Solution-phase surface modification in intact poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic channels. Anal Chem. 2006; 78: 5543-5551.
25. Chan CM,. Polymer Surface Modification and Characterization. Cincinnati, OH: Hanser Gardner Publications; 1996.
26. Udenfriend S, Stein S, Bohlen P, Dairman W, Leimgruber W, Weigele M,. Fluorescamine: a reagent for assay of amino acids, peptides, proteins, and primary amines in the picomole range. Science. 1972; 178: 871-872.
27. Farokhzad OC, Jon S, Khademhosseini A, Tran TN, Lavan DA, Langer R,. Nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates: a new approach for targeting prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 7668-7672.
28. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B,. Biologically inspired surfaces: broadening the scope of roughness. Adv Funct Mater. 2008; 18: 843-855.
29. Bhushan B,. Adhesion and stiction: mechanisms, measurement techniques, and methods for reduction. J Vac Sci Technol B Microelectron Nanometer Struct. 2003; 21: 2262-2296.
30. Xu QF, Wang NJ, Smith IH, Sanderson KD,. Directing the transportation of a water droplet on a patterned superhydrophobic surface [letter]. Applied Phys Lett 93: 233112, 2008.
31. Bhattacharya S, Gangopadhyay D, Chanda N, et al. Mechanics of plasma exposed spin-on-glass (SOG) and polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) surfaces and their impact on bond strength. Applied Surface Sci. 2007; 253: 4220-4225.
32. Bhattacharya S, Singh RK, Mandal S, et al. Plasma modification of polymer surfaces and their utility in building biomedical microdevices. J Adhesion Sci Technol. 2010; 24: 2707-2739.
33. Hillborg H, Gedde UW,. Hydrophobicity recovery of polydimethylsiloxane after exposure to corona discharges. Polymer. 1998; 39: 1991-1998.
34. Bhattacharya S, Datta A, Berg JM, Gangopadhyay S,. Studies on surface wettability of poly(dimethyl) siloxane (PDMS) and glass under oxygen-plasma treatment and correlation with bond strength. J Micromechanical Syst. 2005; 14: 590-597.
35. Berdichevsky Y, Khandurina J, Guttman A, Lo Y-H,. UV/ozone modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic channels. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2004; 97: 402-408.
36. Diaz-Quijada GA, Wayner DD,. A simple approach to micropatterning and surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane). Langmuir. 2004; 20: 9607-9611.
37. Fuentes M, Mateo C, Garcia L, et al. Directed covalent immobilization of aminated DNA probes on aminated plates. Biomacromolecules. 2004; 5: 883-888.
38. Kohli P, Harrell CC, Cao Z, Gasparac R, Tan W, Martin CR,. DNA-functionalized nanotube membranes with single-base mismatch selectivity. Science. 2004; 305: 984-986.
39. Fu YJ, Qui HZ, Liao KS, et al. Effect of UV-ozone treatment on poly(dimethylsiloxane) membranes: surface characterization and gas separation performance. Langmuir. 2009; 26: 4392-4399.
40. Brown XQ, Ookawa K, Wong JY,. Evaluation of polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds with physiologically relevant elastic moduli: interplay of substrate mechanics and surface chemistry effects on vascular smooth muscle cell response. Biomaterials. 2005; 26: 3123-3129.