Self-interaction, nucleic acid binding, and nucleic acid chaperone activities are unexpectedly retained in the unique ORF1p of zebrafish LINE

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 458-469

  Nakamura, Mitsuhiro ^a   Okada, Norihiro ^a   Kajikawa, Masaki ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; RNA BINDING PROTEIN; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZFL2 1 PROTEIN;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CROSS LINKING; DNA TRANSPOSITION; IN VITRO STUDY; LONG INTERSPERSED REPEAT; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN NUCLEIC ACID INTERACTION; RNA BINDING; RNA CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALS; ESTERASES; LONG INTERSPERSED NUCLEOTIDE ELEMENTS; NUCLEIC ACIDS; OPEN READING FRAMES; PROTEIN BINDING; ZEBRAFISH; ZEBRAFISH PROTEINS;

EID: 84856805287     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.06162-11     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cost GJ, Feng Q, Jacquier A, Boeke JD. 2002. Human L1 element target-primed reverse transcription in vitro. EMBO J. 21:5899-5910.
2. Dawson A, Hartswood E, Paterson T, Finnegan DJ. 1997. A LINE-like transposable element in Drosophila, the I factor, encodes a protein with properties similar to those of retroviral nucleocapsids. EMBO J. 16:4448-4455.
3. Doucet AJ, et al. 2010. Characterization of LINE-1 ribonucleoprotein particles. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001150.
4. Eickbush TH, Malik HS. 2002. Origins and evolution of retrotransposons, p 1111-1144. In Craig NL, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz AM (ed), Mobile DNA II. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
5. Evans JD, Peddigari S, Chaurasiya KR, Williams MC, Martin SL. 2011. Paired mutations abolish and restore the balanced annealing and melting activities of ORF1p that are required for LINE-1 retrotransposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:5611-5621.
6. Feng Q, Moran JV, Kazazian HH, Jr, Boeke JD. 1996. Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition. Cell 87:905-916.
7. Goodier JL, Kazazian HH, Jr. 2008. Retrotransposons revisited: the restraint and rehabilitation of parasites. Cell 135:23-35.
8. 2 zinc finger motifs and is endowed with nucleic acid chaperone activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:9209-9220.
9. Ito M, Matsuo Y, Nishikawa K. 1997. Prediction of protein secondary structure using the 3D-1D compatibility algorithm. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:415-424.
10. Januszyk K, et al. 2007. Identification and solution structure of a highly conserved C-terminal domain within ORF1p required for retrotransposition of long interspersed nuclear element-1. J. Biol. Chem. 282:24893-24904.
11. Kapitonov VV, Jurka J. 2003. The esterase and PHD domains in CR1-like non-LTR retrotransposons. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:38-46.
12. Kazazian HH, Jr. 2004. Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution. Science 303:1626-1632.
13. Khazina E, Weichenrieder O. 2009. Non-LTR retrotransposons encode noncanonical RRM domains in their first open reading frame. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:731-736.
14. Kulpa DA, Moran JV. 2005. Ribonucleoprotein particle formation is necessary but not sufficient for LINE-1 retrotransposition. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14:3237-3248.
15. Levin JG, Guo J, Rouzina I, Musier-Forsyth K. 2005. Nucleic acid chaperone activity of HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein: critical role in reverse transcription and molecular mechanism. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 80:217-286.
16. Luan DD, Korman MH, Jakubczak JL, Eickbush TH. 1993. Reverse transcription of R2BmRNAis primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: a mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition. Cell 72:595-605.
17. Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J. 1991. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252:1162-1164.
18. Malik HS, Burke WD, Eickbush TH. 1999. The age and evolution of non-LTR retrotransposable elements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:793-805.
19. Martin SL, Branciforte D, Keller D, Bain DL. 2003. Trimeric structure for an essential protein in L1 retrotransposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:13815-13820.
20. Martin SL, Bushman FD. 2001. Nucleic acid chaperone activity of the ORF1 protein from the mouse LINE-1 retrotransposon. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:467-475.
21. Martin SL, et al. 2005. LINE-1 retrotransposition requires the nucleic acid chaperone activity of the ORF1 protein. J. Mol. Biol. 348:549-561.
22. Martin SL, Li J, Weisz JA. 2000. Deletion analysis defines distinct functional domains for protein-protein and nucleic acid interactions in the ORF1 protein of mouse LINE-1. J. Mol. Biol. 304:11-20.
23. Matsumoto T, Hamada M, Osanai M, Fujiwara H. 2006. Essential domains for ribonucleoprotein complex formation required for retrotransposition of telomere-specific non-long terminal repeat retrotransposon SART1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:5168-5179.
24. Moran JV, et al. 1996. High frequency retrotransposition in cultured mammalian cells. Cell 87:917-927.
25. Nishikawa K, Noguchi T. 1991. Predicting protein secondary structure based on amino acid sequence. Methods Enzymol. 202:31-44.
26. Nomura Y, et al. 2006. Solution structure and functional importance of a conserved RNA hairpin of eel LINE UnaL2. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 5184-5193.
27. Putnam NH, et al. 2007. Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic organization. Science 317:86-94.
28. Rajkowitsch L, Schroeder R. 2007. Dissecting RNA chaperone activity. RNA. 13:2053-2060.
29. Seleme MC, Busseau I, Malinsky S, Bucheton A, Teninges D. 1999. High-frequency retrotransposition of a marked I factor in Drosophila melanogaster correlates with a dynamic expression pattern of the ORF1 protein in the cytoplasm of oocytes. Genetics 151:761-771.
30. Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:W244-W248.
31. Sugano T, Kajikawa M, Okada N. 2006. Isolation and characterization of retrotransposition-competent LINEs from zebrafish. Gene 365: 74-82.
32. Suzuki J, et al. 2009. Genetic evidence that the non-homologous endjoining repair pathway is involved in LINE retrotransposition. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000461.
33. Takahashi H, Fujiwara H. 2002. Transplantation of target site specificity by swapping the endonuclease domains of two LINEs. EMBO J. 21: 408-417.