Toward overtrust-free advanced driver assistance systems

Cognition, Technology and Work

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 51-60

  Itoh, Makoto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adaptive cruise control; Advanced driver assistance systems; Human interface; Overtrust; Reliance; Trust in automation

Indexed keywords

ACC SYSTEMS; ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL; ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SYSTEMS; DRIVING SIMULATOR; HUMAN INTERFACE; OVERTRUST; RELIANCE; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; TRUST MODELS;

AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS;

ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84856797154     PISSN: 14355558     EISSN: 14355566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-011-0195-2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Coelingh E, Eidehall A, Bengtsson M (2010) Collision warning with full auto brake and pedestrian detection-a practical example of automatic emergency braking. In: Proceedings of 2010 13th International IEEE annual conference on intelligent transportation systems, Madeira Island, Portugal, pp 155-160. doi: 10. 1109/ITSC. 2010. 5625077.
2. Dickie DA, Boyle LN (2009) Driver's understanding of adaptive cruise control limitations. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 53rd annual meeting, San Antonio, pp 1806-1810.
3. Distner M, Bengtsson M, Broberg T, Jakobsson L (2009) City safety-a system addressing rear-end collisions at low speeds. In: Proceedings of the 21st International technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, No. 09-0371, Stuttgart, Germany. Retrieved from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/esv/esv21/09-0371.pdf.
4. Dzindolet MT, Pierce LG, Beck HP, Dawe LA (2002) The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Hum Factors 44(1): 79-94.
5. Gao J, Lee JD, Zhang Y (2006) A dynamic model of interaction between reliance on automation and cooperation in multi-operator multi-automation situations. Int J Ind Ergonomics 36: 511-526.
6. Goodrich MA, Boer ER (2003) Model-based human-centered task allocation: a case study in ACC system design. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 33(3): 325-336.
7. Hoedemaeker M, Brookhuis KA (1998) Behavioral adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC). Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 1(2): 95-106.
8. Isermann R, Mannale R, Schimitt K (2010) Collision avoidance systems PRORETA: situation analysis and intervention control. In: Proceedings of 6th IFAC symposium in advances in automatic control, Munich, Germany, pp 461-470.
9. ISO (2002) Transport information and control systems-adaptive cruise control systems-performance requirements and test procedures, p 15622.
10. Itoh M (2001) Ambiguity as a buffer in change of trust in automation. In Proceedings of IFAC symposium in analysis, design, and evaluation of human-machine systems, Kassel, Germany, pp 241-247.
11. Itoh (2008) Deceleration meter: a management tool for reducing over-reliance in collision warning when using adaptive cruise control system. In: Proceedings of PSAM9, CD-ROM, p 7.
12. Itoh M (2010) Necessity of supporting situation awareness to prevent over-trust in automation. Int Electr J Nucl Saf Simul 1(2): 150-157.
13. Itoh M, Inahashi H, Tanaka K (2003) Informing limit of ability and its reasons for reducing overtrust in automation. In: Proceedings of XVth triennial congress of the international ergonomics association, Seoul, vol 1, pp 141-144.
14. Itoh M, Sakami D, Tanaka K (2007) Risk compensation due to human adaptation to automation for system safety. Trans Soc Instrum Control Eng 43(10): 926-934.
15. Kaempchen N, Schiele B, Dietmayer K (2009) Situation assessment of an autonomous emergency brake for arbitrary vehicle-to-vehicle collision scenarios. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 10(4): 678-687.
16. Kondoh T, Yamamura T, Kitazaki S, Kuge N, Boer ER (2008) Identification of visual cues and quantification of drivers' perception of proximity risk to the lead vehicle in car-following situations. J Mech Syst Transp Logist 1(2): 170-180.
17. Larsson AFL (2011)Driver usage and understanding of adaptive cruise control. Applied Ergonomics. doi: 10. 1016/j. apergo. 2011. 08. 005.
18. Lee JD, Moray N (1992) Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics 3(10): 1243-1270.
19. Lee JD, See KA (2004) Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum Factors 46(1): 50-80.
20. Ma R, Kaber DB (2005) Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone. Int J Ind Ergonomics 35(10): 939-953.
21. Moray N, Inagaki T (2000) Attention and complacency. Theor Issues Ergonomics Sci 1(4): 354-365.
22. Muir B (1994) Trust in automation: part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human interaction in automated systems. Ergonomics 37(11): 1905-1922.
23. Nilsson L (1995) Safety effects of adaptive cruise controls in critical traffic situations. In: Steps forward proceedings of the second world congress on intelligent transport systems 95 Yokohama, vol 3, pp 1254-1259.
24. Ockerman J, Pritchett A (2000) Reducing overreliance on task-guidance systems. In: Proceedings of the IEA2000/HFES2000 congress, San Diego, vol 1, pp 1-4.
25. OECD (1990) Behavioral adaptations to changes in the road transportation system. OECD, Paris.
26. Parasuraman R, Riley V (1997) Human and automation: use, misuse, and abuse. Hum Factors 39(2): 230-253.
27. Parasuraman R, Sheridan TB, Wickens CD (2008) Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering construct. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 2(2): 140-160.
28. Rudin-Brown CM, Parker HA (2004) Behavioral adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies. Transp Res Part F 7: 59-76.
29. Seppelt BD, Lee JD (2007) Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible. Int J Hum Comput Stud 65: 192-205.
30. Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
31. Sheridan TB (1992) Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. MIT Press, Cambridge.
32. Singh IL, Molloy R, Parasuraman P (1993) Automation-induced "Complacency": development of the complacency-potential rating scale. Int J Aviat Psychol 3(2): 111-122.
33. Stanton N, Young MS (2005) Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics 48(10): 1294-1313.
34. Wada T, Doi S, Tsuru N, Isaji K, Kaneko H (2010) Characterization of expert drivers' last-second braking and its application to a collision avoidance system. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 11(2): 413-422.
35. Wilde GJS (1994) Target risk. PDE Publications, Toronto.
36. Young MS, Stanton NA (2004) Taking the load off: investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workload. Ergonomics 47(9): 1014-1035.