Development of the distance from privilege measures: A tool for understanding the persistence of talented women in STEM

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 88-102

  Kerr, Barbara A ^a   Multon, Karen D ^a   Syme, Maggie L ^a   Fry, Nancy M ^a   Owens, Rhea ^a   Hammond, Marie ^b   Robinson Kurpius, Sharon ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment; diversity; multicultural; privilege; women

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856774725     PISSN: 07342829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734282911428198     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adler N. E.,Epel E. S.,Castellazzo G.,Ickovics J. R.Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women.Health Psychology. 2000;19:586-592.
2. Astin H. S.The meaning of work in women's lives: A sociopsychological model of career choice and work behavior.Counseling Psychologist. 1984;12 (4): 117-126.
3. Betz N. E,Voyten K. K.Efficacy and outcome expectations influence career exploration and decidedness.Career Development Quarterly. 1997;46:179-189.
4. Blustein D. L.,Chaves A. P.,Diemer M. A.,Gallagher L. A.,Marshall K. G.,Sirin S.,Bhati K. S.Voices of the forgotten half: The role of social class in the school-to-work transition.Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2002;49:311-323.
5. Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (2001). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. In M. Lederman & I. Bartsch (Eds.), The ender and science reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
6. Brown, M. T., D'Agruma, H. D., Brown, A., Sia, A., Yamini-Diouf, Y., Porter, S., & Ruiz de Esparza, C. (2002). Differential status identity: Construct, measurement, and initial validation. In Symposium presented during the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
7. Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A, & Chen, H. (2011). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published 1998-2010. Gifted Child Quarterly,55, 2, 126-138. doi:10.1177/0016986210397831.
8. Fouad, N., & Brown, M. (2000). Role of race and social class in development: Implications for counseling psychology. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology III (pp. 379-408). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Fussell P.Class: A guide through the American class system. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 1983:.
10. GagliardiC. (2005). Non-intellective factors and college persistence in honors college women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
11. Goodman E.,Adler N.,Daniels S.,Morrison J.,Slap G.,Dolan L.Impact of objective and subjective social status on obesity in a biracial cohort of adolescents.Obesity Research. 2003;11:1018-1026.
12. Hays, P. A. (2008). Addressing cultural complexities in practice: Assessment, diagnosis, and therapy (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13. Jolly J. L.,Kettler T.Gifted education research 1994-2003: A disconnect between priorities and practice.Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 2008;22:427-446.
14. KurpiusS. R.KerrB. A.HarkinsA. (2005). Counseling women: Talent, risk, & resiliency. Mesa, AZ: Nueva Science. Retrieved from http://www.stemwomen.net/research.php.
15. Liu W. M.Social class and classism in the helping professions: Research, theory, and practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2011:.
16. Liu W. M.,Soleck G.,Hopps J.,Dunston K.,Pickett T.A new framework to understand social class in counseling: The Social Class Worldview Model and Modern Classism Theory.Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development. 2004;32:95-122.
17. Multon K.,Kerr B. A.,Fry N.,Syme M.Development of the gender relations inventory. San Francisco, CA: American Psychological Association; 2007:.
18. Multon K.,Kerr B. A.,Kurpius S. R.,Hammond M.Supports and barriers for women in STEM-An NSF project. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: American Psychological Association; 2009:.
19. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2000). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000030.
20. National Center for Educational Statistics.(2009). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2010013.
21. National Science Foundation. (2006). Science and engineering indicators (NSB 06-01). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/.
22. Noble K. D.,Subotnik R. F.,Arnold K. D.To thine own self be true: A new model of female talent development.Gifted Child Quarterly. 1999;43 (3): 140-149.
23. Seymour E.,Hewitt N.Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview; 1997:.
24. Steele C. M.A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African Americans.American Psychologist. 1997;52:613-629.
25. Thompson M. N.,Subich L. M.The relation of social status to the career decision-making process.Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2006;69:289-301.
26. U. S. Department of Education. (2009). Jacob K. Javits Gifted Education Grants. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/javits/index.html.