ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2564-2571

  Rublee, Ethan ^a   Rabaud, Vincent ^a   Konolige, Kurt ^a   Bradski, Gary ^a  

^a Willow Garage Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION PROBLEMS; DESCRIPTORS; FEATURE MATCHING; OBJECT DETECTION; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; REAL-WORLD APPLICATION; ROTATION INVARIANT; SMART PHONES; STRUCTURE FROM MOTION;

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 84856627527     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126544     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. M. Aly, P. Welinder, M. Munich, and P. Perona. Scaling object recognition: Benchmark of current state of the art techniques. In First IEEE Workshop on Emergent Issues in Large Amounts of Visual Data (WS-LAVD), IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), September 2009. 6
2. H. Bay, T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool. Surf: Speeded up robust features. In European Conference on Computer Vision, May 2006. 1, 2
3. M. Brown, S. Winder, and R. Szeliski. Multi-image matching using multi-scale oriented patches. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 510-517, 2005. 2
4. M. Calonder, V. Lepetit, and P. Fua. Keypoint signatures for fast learning and recognition. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2008. 2
5. M. Calonder, V. Lepetit, K. Konolige, P. Mihelich, and P. Fua. High-speed keypoint description and matching using dense signatures. In Under review, 2009. 2
6. M. Calonder, V. Lepetit, C. Strecha, and P. Fua. Brief: Binary robust independent elementary features. In In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2010. 1, 2, 3, 5
7. O. Chum and J. Matas. Matching with PROSAC-progressive sample consensus. In C. Schmid, S. Soatto, and C. Tomasi, editors, Proc. of Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), volume 1, pages 220-226, Los Alamitos, USA, June 2005. IEEE Computer Society. 7
8. M. Everingham. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2006 (VOC2006) Results. http://pascallin.ecs.soton.ac.uk/challengesNOC/databases.html. 4
9. M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2009 (VOC2009) Results. http://www.pascalnetwork. orglchallengesNOC/voc2009/workshop/index.html. 6, 7
10. A. Gionis, P. Indyk, and R. Motwani. Similarity search in high dimensions via hashing. In M. P. Atkinson, M. E. Orlowska, P. Valduriez, S. B. Zdonik, and M. L. Brodie, editors, VLDB'99, Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, September 7-10, 1999, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, pages 518-529. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999. 6
11. c. Harris and M. Stephens. A combined corner and edge detector. In Alvey Vision Conference, pages 147-151, 1988. 2
12. Y. Ke and R. Sukthankar. Pca-sift: A more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 506-513, 2004. 2
13. G. Klein and D. Murray. Parallel tracking and mapping for small AR workspaces. In Proc. Sixth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR' 07), Nara, Japan, November 2007. 1
14. G. Klein and D. Murray. Improving the agility of keyframebased SLAM. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2008. 2
15. G. Klein and D. Murray. Parallel tracking and mapping on a camera phone. In Proc. Eigth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR'09), Orlando, October 2009. 7
16. V. Lepetit, F. Moreno-Noguer, and P. Fua. EPnP: An accurate O(n) solution to the pnp problem. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 81:155-166, February 2009. 7
17. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2):91-110, 2004. 1, 2
18. Q. Lv, W. Josephson, Z. Wang, M. Charikar, and K. Li. Multi-probe LSH: efficient indexing for high-dimensional similarity search. In Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on Very large data bases, V LDB '07, pages 950-96I. V LDB Endowment, 2007. 6
19. M. Martinez, A. Collet, and S. S. Srinivasa. MOPED: A Scalable and low Latency Object Recognition and Pose Estimation System. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2010. 7
20. M. Muja and D. G. Lowe. Fast approximate nearest neighbors with automatic algorithm configuration. V ISAPP, 2009. 6
21. D. Nister and H. Stewenius. Scalable recognition with a vocabulary tree. In CVPR, 2006. 2,6
22. P. L. Rosin. Measuring corner properties. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 73(2):291-307, 1999. 2
23. E. Rosten and T. Drummond. Machine learning for highspeed corner detection. In European Conference on Computer Vision, volume 1, 2006. I
24. E. Rosten, R. Porter, and T. Drummond. Faster and better: A machine learning approach to corner detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32: 105-119,2010. I
25. S. Se, D. Lowe, and J. Little. Mobile robot localization and mapping with uncertainty using scale-invariant visual landmarks. International Journal of Robotic Research, 21:735-758, August 2002. 1
26. S. N. Sinha, J. michael Frahm, M. Pollefeys, and Y. Genc. Gpu-based video feature tracking and matching. Technical report, In Workshop on Edge Computing Using New Commodity Architectures, 2006. I
27. J. Sivic and A. Zisserrnan. Video google: A text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. International Conference on Computer Vision, page 1470, 2003. 2,6
28. N. Snavely, S. M. Seitz, and R. Szeliski. Skeletal sets for efficient structure from motion. In Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008. I
29. G. Wang, Y. Zhang, and L. Fei-Fei. Using dependent regions for object categorization in a generative framework, 2006. 6
30. A. Weimert, X. Tan, and X. Yang. Natural feature detection on mobile phones with 3D FAST. Int. J. of Virtual Reality, 9:29-34,2010. 7