Framing breast cancer: Building an agenda through online advocacy and fundraising

Public Relations Review

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 108-115

  Weberling, Brooke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Advocacy; Content analysis; Fundraising; Health communication; Nonprofit organizations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856625802     PISSN: 03638111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andsager J., Powers A. Framing women's health with a sense-making approach: Magazine coverage of breast cancer and implants. Health Communication 2001, 13(2):163-185.
2. Carragee K.M., Roefs W. The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication 2004, 54(2):214-233.
3. Cho H., Salmon C.T. Unintended effects of health communication campaigns. Journal of Communication 2007, 57:293-317.
4. Corbett J.B., Mori M. Medicine, media, and celebrities: News coverage of breast cancer, 1960-1995. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 1999, 76:229-249.
5. Cutlip S.M, Center A.H., Broom G.M. Effective public relations 2000, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
6. Daly J., Kellehear A., Gliksman M. The public health researcher: A methodological approach 1997, Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia.
7. Dearing J.W., Rogers E.M. Agenda-setting 1996, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
8. Entman R.M. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 1993, 43(4):51.
9. Fereday J., Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2006, 5(1):1-11.
10. Gandy O.H. Public relations and public policy: The structuration of dominance in the information age. Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations 1992, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 131-163. E.L. Toth, R.L. Heath (Eds.).
11. Goffman E. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience 1974, Harper & Row, New York.
12. Hallahan K. Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research 1999, 11(3):205-242.
13. Ingenhoff D., Koelling A.M. The potential of websites as a relationship building tool for charitable fundraising NPOs. Public Relations Review 2009, 35(1):66-73.
14. Iyengar S. Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues 1991, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
15. Kelly K.S. Stewardship: The fifth step in the public relations process. Handbook of public relations 2001, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 279-289. R.L. Heath (Ed.).
16. Kensicki L.J. No cure for what ails us: The media-constructed disconnect between societal problems and possible solutions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 2004, 81(1):53-73.
17. Kent M.L. Critical analysis of blogging in public relations. Public Relations Review 2008, 34(1):32-40.
18. King S. Pink ribbons, Inc. Breast cancer and the politics of philanthropy 2006, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
19. Ledingham J.A. Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research 2003, 15(2):181-198.
20. Lemert J. News context and the elimination of mobilizing information: An experiment. Journalism Quarterly 1984, 61(2):243-259.
21. McCarthy J.D., Castelli J. The necessity for studying organizational advocacy comparatively. Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector 2002, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 103-121. P. Flynn, V.A. Hodgkinson (Eds.).
22. McCombs M.E., Llamas J.P., Lopez-Escobar E., Rey F. Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second level agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 1997, 74:703-717.
23. McCombs M.E., Shaw D.L. The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 1972, 36:176-187.
24. Meyerowitz B., Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1987, 52(3):500-510.
25. Owen W. Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech 1984, 70(3):274-287.
26. Putnam L.L. The interpretive perspective: An alternative to functionalism. Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach 1983, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 31-54. L. Putnam, M. Pacanowsky (Eds.).
27. Reese S.D. The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication 2007, 57(1):148-154.
28. Ruiter R., Kok G., Verplanken B., Van Eersel G. Strengthening the persuasive impact of fear appeals: The role of action framing. Journal of Social Psychology 2003, 143(3):397-400.
29. Scheufele D., Tewksbury D. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication 2007, 57(1):9-20.
30. Susan G. Komen for the Cure (2009). About us. Retrieved from http://ww5.komen.org/AboutUs/AboutUs.html.
31. Susan G. Komen for the Cure Advocacy Alliance (2009). Frequently asked questions (FAQ). Retrieved from http://www.komenadvocacy.org/content.aspx%3Fid=84.
32. Turk J.V. Information subsidies and influence. Public Relations Review 1985, 11(3):10-25.
33. Turk J.V. Information subsidies and media content: A study of public relations influence on the news. Journalism Monographs 1986, 100:1-29.
34. Wallack L., Dorfman J., Jernigan D., Themba M. Media advocacy and public health: Power for prevention 1993, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
35. Walters L.M., Gray R. Agenda building in the 1992 presidential campaign. Public Relations Review 1996, 22:9-24.
36. Waters R. Measuring stewardship in public relations: A test exploring impact on the fundraising relationship. Public Relations Review 2009, 35(2):113-119.
37. Waters R., Burnett E., Lamm A., Lucas J. Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review 2009, 35(2):102-106.
38. Yeon H.M., Choi Y., Kiousis S. Interactive communication features on nonprofit organizations' webpages for the practice of excellence in public relations. Journal of Website Promotion 2005, 1(4):61-83.
39. Young D.R., Salamon L.M. Commercialization, social ventures and for-profit competition. The state of nonprofit America 2002, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 423-446. L.M. Salamon (Ed.).
40. Zoch L.M., Collins E.L., Sisco H.F., Supa D.H. Empowering the activist: Using framing devices on activist organizations' websites. Public Relations Review 2008, 34(4):351-358.
41. Zoch L.M., Molleda J.C. Building a theoretical model of media relations using framing, information subsidies and agenda building. Public relations theory II 2006, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 279-309. C.H. Botan, V. Hazleton (Eds.).