Estimation of cerebrospinal fluid compensation parameters in hydrocephalus using short-lasting constant rate lumbar infusion tests

British Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 38-44

  Piechnik, Stefan K ^a   Ferreira, Vanessa M ^a   Cieslicki, Krzysztof ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cerebrospinal fluid; Hydrocephalus; Infusion test; Intracranial volume compensation; Measurement accuracy

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; AGED; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID ANALYSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROCEPHALUS; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; LUMBAR INFUSION TEST; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID PRESSURE; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROCEPHALUS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENTRICULAR; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84856622651     PISSN: 02688697     EISSN: 1360046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2011.591848     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Klinge P, Relkin N, Black PM. The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57:S17-28; discussion ii-v.
2. Eklund A, Smielewski P, Chambers I, Alperin N, Malm J, Czosnyka M, et al. Assessment of cerebrospinal f uid outf ow resistance. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007;45:719-35. (Pubitemid 47202533)
3. Marmarou A, Shulman K, LaMorgese J. Compartmental analysis of compliance and outf ow resistance of the cerebrospinal f uid system. J Neurosurg 1975;43:523-34.
4. Borgesen SE, Albeck MJ, Gjerris F, Czosnyka M, Laniewski P. Computerized infusion test compared to steady pressure constant infusion test in measurement of resistance to CSF outf ow. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1992;119:12-6. (Pubitemid 23022761)
5. Kosteljanetz M. Resistance to outf ow of cerebrospinal f uid determined by bolus injection technique and constant rate steady state infusion in humans. Neurosurgery 1985;16:336-40. (Pubitemid 15109999)
6. Hussey F, Schanzer B, Katzman R. A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption. II. Clinical studies. Neurology 1970;20:665-80.
7. Katzman R, Hussey F. A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption. I. Rationale and method. Neurology 1970;20:534-44.
8. Czosnyka M, Batorski L, Laniewski P, Maksymowicz W, Koszewski W, Zaworski W. A computer system for the identif cation of the cerebrospinal compensatory model. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990;105:112-6. (Pubitemid 20363600)
9. Cieslicki K, Czepko R. Can infusion tests be recommended for patients with giant hydrocephalus? Neurol India 2010;58:78-84.
10. Cieslicki K, Krol T, Piechnik SK. Dynamic validation of the estimates obtained by lumbar infusion test in hydrocephalic patients. In Sixth IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (BioMED 2008). Innsbruck, Austria: Acta press; 2008. p. 396-401.
11. Czosnyka M, Whitehouse H, Smielewski P, Simac S, Pickard JD. Testing of cerebrospinal compensatory reserve in shunted and non-shunted patients: a guide to interpretation based on an observational study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;60: 549-58. (Pubitemid 26147898)
12. Cieslicki K, Czepko R. Optimal use of the lumbar infusion test in patients with communicating hydrocephalus. T eoretical considerations in comparison to clinical observations. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2004;38:189-95.
13. Cieslicki K, Czepko R, Libionka W. Comments on ' Analysis of intracranial pressure during and after the infusion test in patients with communicating hydrocephalus '. Physiol Meas 2006;27:L5-8; author reply L9-12. (Pubitemid 44339476)
14. Jurkiewicz J, Czernicki Z, Berdyga J, Uchman G. T ree-phase infusion test. Neurol Neurochir Pol 1994;28:363-9.
15. Juniewicz H, Kasprowicz M, Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Gizewski S, Dzik M, et al. Analysis of intracranial pressure during and after the infusion test in patients with communicating hydrocephalus. Physiol Meas 2005;26:1039-48. (Pubitemid 41744561)
16. Kasprowicz M, Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M, Momjian S, Juniewicz H, Pickard JD. Slight elevation of baseline intracranial pressure after fluid infusion into CSF space in patients with hydrocephalus. Neurol Res 2004;26:628-31.
17. Cieslicki KM. Hydrodynamic basis of cerebral circulation Hydrodynamiczne uwarunkowania krazenia mozgowego. Warsaw: Academicka Of cyna Wydawnicza, 2001.
18. Kahlon B, Sjunnesson J, Rehncrona S. Long-term outcome in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2007;60:327-32; discussion 332.
19. Kahlon B, Sundbarg G, Rehncrona S. Comparison between the lumbar infusion and CSF tap tests to predict outcome after shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:721-6. (Pubitemid 35448859)
20. Greitz D. Radiological assessment of hydrocephalus: new theories and implications for therapy. Neurosurg Rev 2004;27:145-65; discussion 166-7.
21. Greitz D. Paradigm shift in hydrocephalus research in legacy of Dandy's pioneering work: rationale for third ventriculostomy in communicating hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 2007;23: 487-89. (Pubitemid 46567110)
22. Andersson K, Manchester IR, Andersson N, Shiriaev A, Malm J, Eklund A. Assessment of cerebrospinal f uid outf ow conductance using an adaptive observer-experimental and clinical evaluation. Physiol Meas 2007;28:1355-68. (Pubitemid 350058966)
23. Andersson N, Malm J, Wiklund U, Eklund A. Adaptive method for assessment of cerebrospinal f uid outf ow conductance. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007;45:337-43. (Pubitemid 46510858)