Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance using an adaptive observer - Experimental and clinical evaluation

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1355-1368

  Andersson, K ^a,b   Manchester, I R ^a   Andersson, N ^a,b   Shiriaev, A ^a,c   Malm, J ^a   Eklund, A ^a,b  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Adaptive observer; Normal pressure hydrocephalus; Outflow conductance; Real time estimation

Indexed keywords

BRAIN;

ADAPTIVE OBSERVER; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SYSTEMS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONSTANT PRESSURES; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; EXPERIMENTAL SET UP; HYDROCEPHALUS PATIENTS; NORMAL PRESSURE HYDROCEPHALUS; OUTFLOW CONDUCTANCE; REAL-TIME ESTIMATION;

CEREBROSPINAL FLUID;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID FLOW; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SHUNTING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROCEPHALUS; IDIOPATHIC DISEASE; MALE; NORMOTENSIVE HYDROCEPHALUS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 35848959500     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 13616579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/11/003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andersson N, Malm J, Backlund T and Eklund A 2005 Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance using constant-pressure infusion-a method with real time estimation of reliability Physiol. Meas. 26 1137-48
2. Andersson N, Malm J and Eklund E 2007a Intracranial pressure dependency of the cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance submitted
3. Andersson N, Malm J, Wiklund U and Eklund A 2007b Adaptive method for assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 45 337-43
4. Bland J M and Altman D G 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 307-10
5. Boon A J, Tans J T, Delwel E J, Egeler_Peerdeman S M, Hanlo P W, Wurzer H A, Avezaat C J, de Jong D A, Gooskens R H and Hermans J 1997 Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid J. Neurosurg. 87 687-93
6. Borgesen S E, Albeck M J, Gjerris F, Czosnyka M and Laniewski P 1992 Computerized infusion test compared to steady pressure constant infusion test in measurement of resistance to CSF outflow Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 119 12-6
7. Borgesen S E, Gjerris F and Srensen S C 1978 The resistance to cerebrospinal fluid absorption in humans. A method of evaluation by lumbo-ventricular perfusion, with particular reference to normal pressure hydrocephalus Acta Neurol. Scand. 57 88-96
8. Bouma G J, Muizelaar J P, Bandoh K and Marmarou A 1992 Blood pressure and intracranial pressure-volume dynamics in severe head injury: relationship with cerebral blood flow J. Neurosurg. 77 15-9
9. Czosnyka M, Batorski L, Laniewski P, Maksymowicz W, Koszewski W and Zaworski W 1990 A computer system for the identification of the cerebrospinal compensatory model Acta Neurochir. 105 112-6
10. Eklund A, Smielewski P, Chambers I, Alperin N, Malm J, Czosnyka M and Marmarou A 2007 Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 45 719-35
11. Ekstedt J 1977 CSF hydrodynamic studies in man: 1. Method of constant pressure CSF infusion J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 40 105-19
12. Katzman R and Hussey F 1970 A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption: I. Rationale and method Neurology 20 534-44
13. Kosteljanetz M 1985 Resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid determined by bolus injection technique and constant rate steady state infusion in humans Neurosurgery 16 336-40
14. Malm J and Eklund A 2006 Idiopathic normal presssure hydrocephalus Pract. Neurol. 6 14-27
15. Malm J, Kristensen B, Karlsson T, Fagerlund M, Elfverson J and Ekstedt J 1995 The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome Arch. Neurol. 52 783-9
16. Manchester I R, Andersson K S, Eklund A, Shiriaev A and Andersson N 2007 A nonlinear observer for on-line estimation of the cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance Automatica at press
17. Marmarou A 1973 A Theoretical Model and Experimental Evaluation of the Cerebrospinal Fluid System (Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University)
18. Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Klinge P, Relkin N and Black P M 2005 The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus Neurosurgery 57 17-28
19. Marmarou A, Maset A L, Ward J D, Choi S, Brooks D, Lutz H A, Moulton R J, Muizelaar J P, DeSalles A and Young H F 1987 Contribution of CSF and vascular factors to elevation of ICP in severely head-injured patients J. Neurosurg. 66 883-90
20. Marmarou A, Shulman K and Rosende R M 1978 A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics J. Neurosurg. 48 332-44
21. Maset A L et al 1987 Pressure-volume index in head injury J. Neurosurg. 67 832-40
22. Pukelsheim F 1993 Optimal Design of Experiments (New York: Wiley)
23. Shapiro K, Marmarou A and Shulman K 1980 Characterization of clinical CSF dynamics and neural axis compliance using the pressure-volume index: I. The normal pressure-volume index Ann. Neurol. 7 508-14
24. Tans J T and Boon A J 2002 How to select patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus for shunting Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 81 3-5
25. Tans J T and Poortvliet D C 1985 CSF outflow resistance and pressure-volume index determined by steady-state and bolus infusions Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 87 159-65
26. Tasch U, Koontz J W, Ignatoski M A and Geselowitz D B 1990 An adaptive aortic pressure observer for the Penn state electric ventricular assist device IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37 374-83
27. Tullberg M, Jensen C, Ekholm S and Wikkelso C 2001 Normal pressure hydrocephalus: vascular white matter changes on MR images must not exclude patients from shunt surgery AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 22 1665-73