Adaptive method for assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 337-343

  Andersson, Nina ^a,b   Malm, Jan ^b   Wiklund, Urban ^a,b   Eklund, Anders ^a,b  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics; Idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome; Infusion test; Intracranial pressure; Normal pressure hydrocephalus; Outflow conductance; Outflow resistance

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; ALGORITHMS; BODY FLUIDS; ESTIMATION; PATIENT MONITORING; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL ANALYSIS;

ADAPTIVE SIGNAL ANALYSIS METHOD; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID DYNAMICS; IDIOPATHIC ADULT HYDROCEPHALUS SYNDROME (IAHS); INFUSION TEST; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; NORMAL PRESSURE HYDROCEPHALUS; OUTFLOW CONDUCTANCE; OUTFLOW RESISTANCE;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID FLOW; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SHUNTING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROCEPHALUS; IDIOPATHIC ADULT HYDROCEPHALUS SYNDROME; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE MONITORING; MALE; NORMOTENSIVE HYDROCEPHALUS; RELIABILITY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SHUNTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROCEPHALUS, NORMAL PRESSURE; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34047092766     PISSN: 01400118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-006-0157-7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Andersson N, Malm J, Bäcklund T, Eklund A (2005) Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance using constant-pressure infusion - a method with real time estimation of reliability. Physiol Meas 26:1137-1148
2. Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HA, Avezaat CJ, De Jong DA, Gooskens RH, Hermans J (1997) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: Prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurosurg 87:687-693
3. Borgesen SE, Albeck MJ, Gjerris F, Czosnyka M, Laniewski P (1992) Computerized infusion test compared to steady pressure constant infusion test in measurement of resistance to CSF outflow. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 119:12-16
4. Borgesen SE, Gjerris F (1982) The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 105:65-86
5. Brockwell PJ, Davis RA (2002) Introduction to time series and forecasting, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
6. Czosnyka M, Batorski L, Laniewski P, Maksymowicz W, Koszewski W, Zaworski W (1990) A computer system for the identification of the cerebrospinal compensatory model. Acta Neurochir (Wein) 105:112-116
7. Czosnyka M, Whitehouse H, Smielewski P, Simac S, Pickard JD (1996) Testing of cerebrospinal compensatory reserve in shunted and non-shunted patients: A guide to interpretation based on an observational study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 60:549-558
8. Ekstedt J (1977) CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 1. Method of constant pressure CSF infusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 40:105-119
9. Ekstedt J (1978) CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 2. Normal hydrodynamic variables related to CSF pressure and flow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 41:345-353
10. Kay S, Marple S (1981) Spectrum analysis - a modern perspective. Proc IEEE 69:1380-1417
11. Kosteljanetz M (1985) Resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid determined by bolus injection technique and constant rate steady state infusion in humans. Neurosurgery 16:336-340
12. Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand 36(Suppl 149):1-193
13. Lundkvist B, Eklund A, Kristensen B, Fagerlund M, Koskinen LO, Malm J (2001) Cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics after placement of a shunt with an antisiphon device: A long-term study. J Neurosurg 94:750-756
14. Malm J, Eklund A (2006) Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Pract Neurol 6:14-27
15. Malm J, Kristensen B, Karlsson T, Fagerlund M, Elfverson J, Ekstedt J (1995) The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with the idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. Arch Neurol 52:783-789
16. Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Klinge P, Relkin N, Black P (2005) The value of supplemental Prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57:17-28
17. Marmarou A, Young HF, Aygok GA, Sawauchi S, Tsuji O, Yamamoto T, Dunbar J (2005) Diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: A prospective study in 151 patients. Neurosurgery 102:987-997
18. Marmarou A, Shulman K, Rosende RM (1978) A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. J Neurosurg 48:332-344
19. Meier U, Zeilinger FS, Kintzel D (1999) Diagnostic in normal pressure hydrocephalus: A mathematical model for determination of the ICP-dependent resistance and compliance. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141:941-947; discussion 947-948
20. Rosner B (2000) Fundamentals of biostatistics, 5th edn. Duxbury, Pacific Grove
21. Stephensen H, Andersson N, Eklund A, Malm J, Tisell M, Wikkelsö C (2005) Objective B wave analysis in 55 patients with non-communicating and communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 76:965-970
22. Tans JT, Poortvliet DC (1985) CSF outflow resistance and pressure-volume index determined by steady-state and bolus infusions. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 87:159-165
23. Van Der Leeuw J (1994) The covariance matrix of ARMA errors in closed form. J Econom 63:397-405