Dynamic validation of the estimates obtained by lumbar infusion test in hydrocephalic patients

Proceedings of the 6th IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, BioMED 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 396-401

  Cieslicki, Krzysztof ^a   Krol, Tomasz ^a   Piechnik, Stefan ^b  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cerebrospinal fluid; Hydrocephalus; Infusion test; Mathematical modelling

Indexed keywords

CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; CLINICAL PRACTICES; CLINICAL TOOLS; CONSISTENCY OF ESTIMATES; FREE PARAMETERS; HYDROCEPHALUS; INFLECTION POINTS; INFUSION TEST; MATHEMATICAL MODELLING; MEASUREMENT NOISE; MODEL ESTIMATIONS; MODEL PARAMETERS; MONITORING TIME; OFF-LINE SOFTWARES; REAL-TIME APPLICATIONS; RESPONSE CURVES; STEADY STATE;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BODY FLUIDS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONITORING; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS;

TESTING;

EID: 63149133277     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. M. Czosnyka, J. D. Piccard, Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 63, 2004, 721-731.
2. A. J. W. Boon, J. Th Tans, E. J. Delwel, S. M. Egeler- Peerdeman, J. Hermans, The Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus Study how to select patients for shunting? An analysis of four diagnostic criteria. Surg Neurol, 53, 2000, 201-207.
3. B. Czapiga, W. Zub, J. Mierzwa and J Wroñski. Infusion test in the selection of patients with hydrocephalus for shunting. Neurol Neurochir Pol, 34, 2000, 103-111.
4. A. Marmarou, K. Shulman, R. M. Rosende, A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics, J Neurosurg, 48, 1978, 332-336.
5. C. J. J. Avezaat, J. H. M. Eijndhoven, Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and craniospinal dynamics. A theoretical, clinical and experimental study (thesis) (Hague, A Jongbloed en Zoon, 1984).
6. R. Ravi, R. J. Morgan, Intracranial pressure monitoring, Current Anaesthesia Critical Care, 14, 2003, 229-235.
7. K. Cieslicki, R. Czepko, Optimal use of the lumbar infusion test in patients with communicating hydrocephalus. Theoretical considerations in comparison to clinical observations, Neurol Neurochir Pol, 38, 2004, 189-195.
8. H. Davson, Formation and drainage of the CSF in hydrocephalus, in: Hydrocephalus, Shapiro K, Marmarou A, Portnoy H (eds), (Raven Press, New York 1984), 112-160.
9. J. Ekstedt, CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. Method of constant pressure CSF infusion,. J. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr, y, 40, 1977, 105-119.
10. J. A. Nelder, R. Mead, A Simplex Method for Function Minimization. Comput J, 7, 1965, 308-313.
11. M. Czosnyka, H. Whitehouse, P. Smielewski, S. Simac, J. D. Pickard, Testing of cerebrospinal compensatory reserve in shunted and non-shunted patients: a guide to interpretation based on observational study, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 60, 1996, 549-558.
12. S. E. Borgesen, M. J. Albeck, F. Gjerris, M. Czosnyka, P. Laniewski, Computerized infusion test compared to steady pressure constant infusion test in measurement of resistance to CSF outflow, Acta Neurochir (Wien), 119, 1992, 12-16.
13. E. Delwel J, D. A. de Jonge, C. J. J. Avezaat, The prognostic value of clinical characteristics and parameters of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, Acta Neurochir (Wien), 147, 2005, 1037-1043.
14. J. Szewczykowski, S. Śliwka, A. Kunicki, et al., A fast method of estimating the elastance of the intracranial system., J Neurosur, 47, 1978, 19-26.
15. H. Juniewicz, M. Kasprowicz, M. Czosnyka, Z. Czosnyka, S. Gilewski, M. Dzik and J. D. Piccard, Analysis of intracranial pressure during and after the infusion test in patients with communicating hydrocephalus, Physiol Meas, 26, 2005, 1039-1048.
16. J. Jurkiewicz, Z. Czernicki, J. Berdyga, G. Uchman et al., Changes in CSF reabsorbtion resistance. Experimental studies, Neurol Neurochir Pol Suppl, 1, 1992, 207-212.
17. U. Meier, F. St. Zeilinger, D. Kintzel, Diagnostic in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a mathematical model for determination of the ICP-dependent resistance and compliance, Acta Neurochir (Wien), 141, 1999, 1039-1048.
18. K. Cieslicki, R. Czepko, W. Libionka, Comments on "Analysis of intracranial pressure during and after the infusion test in patients with communicating hydrocephalus", Physiol Meas, 27, 2006, L5-L8.
19. H. Juniewicz, M. Kasprowicz, Z. Czosnyka, M. Czosnyka, Reply to Comments on "Analysis of intracranial pressure during and after the infusion test in patients with communicating hydrocephalus", Physiol Meas, 27, 2006, L9-L12.