Effect of Ultrasound Parameters on the Release of Liposomal Calcein

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 476-486

  Afadzi, Mercy ^a   Davies, Catharina de L ^a   Hansen, Yngve H ^a   Johansen, Tonni ^a   Standal, Øyvind K ^a   Hansen, Rune ^a,b   Måsøy, Svein Erik ^a   Nilssen, Esben A ^c   Angelsen, Bjørn ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b SINTEF TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY   (Norway)

^c Epitarget AS   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cavitation; Drug release; Liposomes; Mechanical index; Ultrasound parameters

Indexed keywords

CALCEIN; DRUG RELEASE; DUTY CYCLES; EXPOSURE-TIME; FIRST ORDER KINETICS; HYDROXIDE RADICALS; MECHANICAL INDEXES; MECHANICAL INDICES; MODEL DRUGS; NEGATIVE PRESSURES; ULTRASOUND EXPOSURE; ULTRASOUND PARAMETERS;

CAVITATION; LIPOSOMES; ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT;

PHOSPHOLIPIDS;

CALCEIN; DIERUCOYLPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; HYDROXIDE; LIPOSOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACOUSTIC PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CAVITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG RELEASE; MECHANICAL INDEX; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTROPHOTOMETER; TEMPERATURE; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

DELAYED-ACTION PREPARATIONS; DIFFUSION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; FLUORESCEINS; LIPOSOMES; RADIATION DOSAGE; SONICATION;

EID: 84856586389     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: 1879291X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.11.017     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allen T.M. Liposomes: Opportunities in drug delivery. Drugs 1997, 54:8-14.
2. Angelsen B.A.J. Waves, signals, and siginal processing 2002, Emantec, Trondheim, Norway.
3. Apfel R.E., Holland C.K. Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty-cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991, 17:179-185.
4. Bae Y.H. Drug targeting and tumor heterogeneity. JControl Release 2009, 133:2-3.
5. Bednarski M.D., Lee J.W., Callstrom M.R., Li K.C. Invivo target-specific delivery of macromolecular agents with MR-guided focused ultrasound. Radiology 1997, 204:263-268.
6. Barenholz Y. Liposome Technology 2007, 1-21. Gregoriadis, London.
7. Barenholz Y. Liposome application: problems and prospects. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2001, 6:66-77.
8. Blatteau J.E., Souraud J.B., Gempp E., Boussuges A. Gas nuclei, their origin, and their role in bubble formation. Aviat Space Environ Med 2006, 77:1068-1076.
9. Brennen C.E. Cavitation and bubble dynamics 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
10. Daniels S., Blondel D., Crum L.A., Haar G.R., Dyson M. Ultrasonically induced gas bubbles production in agar-based gels: Part I. Experimental investigation. Ultrasound Med Biol 1987, 9:527-539.
11. Davies C.D., Lundsrøm L.M., Frengen J., Eikenes L., Bruland Ø.S., Kaalhus O., Hjelstuen M.H.B., Brekken C. Radiation improves the distribution and uptake of liposomal doxorubicin (caelyx) in human osteosarcoma xenogrefts. Cancer Res 2004, 64:547-553.
12. Deng C.X., Xu Q., Apfel R.E., Holland C.K. Invitro measurements of inertial cavitation thresholds in human blood. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996, 22:939-948.
13. Drummond D.C., Meyer O., Hong K., Kirpotin D.B., Papahadjopoulos D. Optimizing liposomes for delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to solid tumors. Pharmacol Rev 1999, 51:691-743.
14. Duzgunes N., Straubinger R.M., Baldwin P.A., Friend D.S., Papahadjopoulos D. Proton-induced fusion of oleic acid-phosphatidylethanolamine liposomes. Biochemistry 1985, 24:3091-3098.
15. Düzgünes N., Bagatolli L.A., Meers P., Oh Y.K., Straubinger R.M. Fluorescence methods in liposome research 2003, 118-119. Oxford University Press, Liposomes. New York. V.P. Torchilin, V. Weissig (Eds.).
16. Enden G., Schroeder A. Amathematical model of drug release from liposomes by low-frequency ultrasound. Ann Biomed Eng 2009, 37:2640-2645.
17. Evjen T.J., Nilssen E.A., Rögnvaldsson S., Brandl M., Fossheim S.L. Distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine-based liposomes for ultrasound-mediated drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2010, 75:327-333.
18. Evjen T.J., Nilssen E.A., Barnert S., Schubert R., Brandl M., Fossheim S.L. Ultrasound-mediated destabilization and drug release from liposomes comprising dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine. Eur J Pharm Sci 2011, 42:380-386.
19. Guaman H., Nguyen D., Khan S., Prausnitz M. Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes.I. Quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability. JAcous Soc Am 2001, 110:588-596.
20. Hagtvet E., Evjen T.J., Olsen D.R., Fossheim S.L., Nilssen E.A. Ultrasound-enhanced antitumor activity of liposomal doxorubicin in mice. JDrug Target 2011, 1:1-8.
21. Huang S.L., MacDonald C. Acoustically active liposomes for drug encapsulation and ultrasound-triggered release. Biochim Biopys Acta 2004, 1665:134-141.
22. Humphrey V.F. Ultrasound and matter: Physical interactions. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2007, 93:195-211.
23. Husseini G.A., Myrup G.D., Pitt W.G., Christensen D.A., Rapoport N.Y. Factors affecting acoustically triggered release of drugs from polymeric micelles. JControl Release 2000, 69:43-52.
24. Kost J., Langer R. Responsive polymeric delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001, 46:125-148.
25. Lasic D.D. Liposomes: From Physics to Applications 1993, Elsevier, Amsterdam, London, New York, Tokyo.
26. Leighton T.G. The acoustic bubble 1994, Academic Press, London.
27. Leighton T.G., Phelps A.D., Cox B.T., Ho W.L. Theory and preliminary measurements of the Rayleigh-like collapse of a conical bubble. Acta Acoust 1998, 84:801-814.
28. Leighton T.G. What is ultrasound?. Prog Biophs Mol Biol 2007, 93:3-83.
29. Lin H.Y., Thomas J.L. PEG-lipids and oligo (ethylene glycol) surfactants enhance the ultrasonic permeabilizability of liposomes. Langmuir 2003, 19:1098-1105.
30. Lin H.Y., Thomas J.L. Factors affecting responsivity of unilamellar lipsomes to 20 kHz ultrasound. Langmuir 2004, 20:6100-6106.
31. Liu J., Lewis T.N., Prausnitz M.R. Non-invasive assessment and control of ultrasound-mediated membrane permeabilzation. Pharm Res 1988, 15:918-924.
32. Liu Y., Miyoshi H., Nakamura M. Encapsulated ultrasound microbubbles: Therapeutic application in drug/gene delivery. JControl Release 2006, 114:89-99.
33. Marin A., Muniruzzaman M.D., Rapoport N. Acoustic activation of drug delivery from polymeric micelles: Effect of pulsed ultrasound. JControl Release 2001, 71:239-249.
34. Mason T.J., Lorimer J.P., Bates D.M., Zhao Yl Dosimetry in sonochemistry: The use of aqueous terephthalate ion as a fluorescence monitor. Ultrason Sonochem 1994, 1:91-95.
35. Miller M.W., Church C.C., Brayman A.A., Malcuit M.S., Boyd R.W. An explanation for the decrease in cell lysis in a rotating tube with increasing ultrasound intensity. Ultrasound Med Biol 1989, 15:67-72.
36. Miller M.W., Miller D.L., Brayman A.A. Areview of invitro bioeffect of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996, 22:1131-1154.
37. Miller D.L. Overview of experimental studies of biological effects of medical ultrasound caused by gas activation and inertial cavitation. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2007, 93:314-330.
38. Myhr G., Moan J. Synergistic and tumour selective effects of chemotherapy and ultrasound. Cancer Lett 2006, 232:206-213.
39. Pangu G.D., Davies K.P., Bates F.S., Hammer D.A. Ultrasonically induced release from nanosized polymer vesicles. Macromol Biosci 2010, 10:546-554.
40. Pitt W.G., Husseini G.A., Staples B.J. Ultrasonic drug delivery: A general review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2004, 1:37-56.
41. Pitt W.G., Husseini G.A., Roeder B.L., Dickinson D.J., Warden D.R., Hartley J.M., Jones P.W. Preliminary results of combining low-frequency low-intensity ultrasound and liposomal drug delivery to treat tumors in rats. JNanosci Nanotechnol 2011, 11:1866-1870.
42. Price R.J., Skyba D.M., Kaul S., Skalak T.C. Delivery of colloidal particles and red blood cells to tissue through microvessel ruptures created by targeted microbubble destruction with ultrasound. Circulation 1998, 98:1264-1267.
43. Rapoport N. Physical stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for anti-cancer drug delivery. Prog Polym Sci 2007, 32:962-990.
44. Schroeder A., Avnir Y., Weisman S., Najajreh Y., Gabizon A., Talmon Y., Kost J., Barenholz Y. Controlling liposomal drug release with low-frequency ultrasound mechanism and feasibility. Langmuir 2007, 23:4019-4025.
45. Schroeder A., Kost J., Barenholz Y. Ultrasound, liposomes, and drug delivery: Principles for ultrasound to control the release of drugs from liposomes. Chem Phys Lipids 2009, 162:1-16.
46. Somaglino L., Bouchoux G., Mestas J.L., Lafon C. Validation of an acoustic cavitation dose with hydroxyl radical production generated by inertial cavitation in pulsed mode: Application to invitro drug release from liposomes. Ultrason Sonochem 2010, 18:577-588.
47. Steinberg Y., Schroeder A., Talmon Y., Schmidt J., Khalfin R.L., Cohen Y., Dvoissele J.M., Begu S., Avnir D. Synergistic and tumour selective effects of chemotherapy and ultrasound. Langmuir 2007, 23:12024-12031.
48. Torchilin V.P. Recent advances with liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers. Nat Review Drug Discov 2005, 4:145-160.
49. Vaage J., Donovan D., Uster P., Working P. Tumour uptake of doxorubicin in polyethylene glycol-coated liposomes and therapeutic effect against a xenografted human pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Cancer 1997, 75:482-486.
50. Villeneuve L., Alberti L., Steghens J.P., Lancelin J.M., Mestas J.L. Assay of hydroxyl radicals generated by focused ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 2009, 16:339-344.
51. Yuan F., Leunig M., Huang S.K., Berk D.A., Papahadjopoulos D., Jain K. Microvascular permeability and interstitial penetration of sterically-stabilized (Stealth) liposomes in a human tumor xenograft. Cancer Res 1994, 54:3352-3356.
52. Young F.R. Cavitation 1999, Imperial College Press, London.