When Good Characters Do Bad Things: Examining the Effect of Moral Ambiguity on Enjoyment

Journal of Communication

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 117-135

  Krakowiak, K Maja ^a   Oliver, Mary Beth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; MORALITY; RESEARCH; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84856528922     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01618.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Amos users' guide, version 3.6. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
2. Aronson, E. (1969). Some antecedents of interpersonal attraction. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (17, pp. 143-173). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
3. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18, 255-280.
5. Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12, 321-347.
6. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.
7. Cohen, J. (1999). Favorite characters of teenage viewers of Israeli serials. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 327-345.
8. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Comisky, P., & Bryant, J. (1982). Factors involved in generating suspense. Human Communication Research, 9, 49-58.
10. Ealy, S. D. (2005). Corruption and innocence in Robert Penn Warren's fiction. Modern Age, 47, 139-147.
11. Green, M. C. (2002, August). Narrative worlds, real impact: How stories affect beliefs. Paper presented at the 2002 Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature and Media. Pecs, Hungary.
12. Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247-266.
13. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
14. Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311-327.
15. Green, M.C., Rozin, P., Aldao, A., Pollack, B., & Small, A. (2004, August). Effect of story detail on transportation and identification with characters. Paper presented at the 2004 Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
16. Hall, A. (2003). Reading realism: Audiences' evaluations of the reality of media texts. Journal of Communication, 53, 624-641.
17. Hartmann, T. & Vorderer, P. (2010). It's okay to shoot a character: Moral disengagement in violent video games. Journal of Communication, 60, 94-119.
18. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
19. Hoffner, C. (1996). Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 389-402.
20. Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1991). Perceiving and responding to media characters. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 63-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Hoorn, J. F., & Konijn, E. A. (2003). Perceiving and experiencing fictional characters: An integrative account. Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 250-268.
22. Jose, P. E., & Brewer, W. F. (1984). Development of story liking: Character identification, suspense, and outcome resolution. Developmental Psychology, 20, 911-924.
23. Knobloch, S., Patzig, G., Mende, A. M., & Hastall, M. (2004). Affective news: Effects of discourse structure in narratives on suspense, curiosity, and enjoyment while reading news and novels. Communication Research, 31, 259-287.
24. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Keplinger, C. (2007). Thrilling news: Factors generating suspense during news exposure. Media Psychology, 9, 193-210.
25. Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2004). Reality-based genre preferences do not direct personal involvement. Discourse Processes, 38, 219-246.
26. Krakowiak, K. M. & Tsay, M. (2011). The role of moral disengagement in the enjoyment of real and fictional characters. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 4, 90-101.
27. Krcmar, M., & Renfro, S. (2005, May). Developing a scale to assess media enjoyment. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, New York.
28. Livingstone, S. M. (1992). The resourceful reader: Interpreting television characters and narratives. Communication Yearbook, 15, 58-90.
29. Mares, M. L., & Cantor, J. (1992). Elderly viewers' responses to televised portrayals of old age: Empathy and mood management versus social comparison. Communication Research, 19, 459-478.
30. Nabi, R. L., & Krcmar, M. (2004). Conceptualizing media enjoyment as attitude: Implications for mass media effects research. Communication Theory, 14, 288-310.
31. Nabi, R. L., Stitt, C. R., Halford, J., & Finnerty, K. L. (2006). Emotional and cognitive predictors of the enjoyment of reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the uses and gratifications perspective. Media Psychology, 8, 421-447.
32. Ohler, P., & Nieding, G. (1996). Cognitive modeling of suspense-inducing structures in narrative films. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 129-147). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36, 53-81.
34. Oliver, M. B., Kalyanaraman, S., Mahood, C., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2007). Sexual and violent imagery in movie previews: Effects on viewers' perceptions and anticipated enjoyment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 596-614.
35. Oliver, M. B., & Nabi, R. L. (2004). Exploring the concept of media enjoyment: An introduction to the special issue. Communication Theory, 14, 285.
36. Pfau, M., & Mullen, L. J. (1995). The influence of television viewing on public perceptions of physicians. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39, 441-459.
37. Potter, W. J. (1986). Perceived reality and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 159-174.
38. Raney, A. A. (2004). Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14, 348-369.
39. Raney, A. A., & Bryant, J. (2002). Moral judgment and crime drama: An integrated theory of enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 52, 402-415.
40. Segrin, C., & Nabi, R. L. (2002). Does television viewing cultivate unrealistic expectations about marriage? Journal of Communication, 52, 247-263.
41. Shapiro, M. A., & Chock, T. M. (2003). Psychological processes in perceiving reality. Media Psychology, 5, 163-198.
42. Strimel, C. B. (2004). The politics of terror: Rereading 'Harry Potter'. Children's Literature In Education, 35, 35-52.
43. Tsay, M. & Krakowiak, K. M. (2011). The impact of perceived character similarity and identification on moral disengagement. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 4, 102-110.
44. Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., & Ritterfeld, U. (2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14, 388-408.
45. Vorderer, P., & Knobloch, S. (2002). Conflict and suspense in drama. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 59-72). Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Vorderer, P., Knobloch, S., & Schramm, H. (2001). Does entertainment suffer from interactivity? The impact of watching an interactive TV movie on viewers' experience of entertainment. Media Psychology, 3, 343-363.
47. Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271.
48. Zillmann, D. (1991). The logic of suspense and mystery. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 281-303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Zillmann, D. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 199-232). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Zillmann, D. (2000). Basal morality in drama appreciation. In I. Bondebjerg (Ed.), Moving images, culture, and the mind (pp. 53-64). Luton, England: University of Luton Press.
51. Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. (1977). Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 155-165.